this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2026
421 points (99.1% liked)

politics

30930 readers
1900 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

They're just isn't a more polite way to say it, Collins and Murkowski are both lumps of shit with heartbeats.

Any pain they feel is well deserved and not nearly enough.

Their biggest crime is, unlike their colleagues, they don't own their evil. They are Lucy with the football, humanity's misplaced hope in critical moments are collectively Charlie Brown.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 18 points 22 hours ago

Am I mistaken? Or did she vote for every SCOTUS judge that overturned RvW?

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 122 points 1 day ago

People should keep asking her. She's directly responsible.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 22 points 1 day ago

She voted for a BUNCH of justices who overturned Roe, after getting elected multiple times by SWEARING that she would defend it.

[–] ClownStatue@piefed.social 13 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Really sucks this idiot is about to be reelected. Again.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago

She's polling within margin of error against a guy with near-zero name recognition, after Dems were forced to choose between the country's least popular governor and a Nazi rapist.

Honestly have no idea what you're complaining about. Troy Jackson has better odds of winning than either Platner or Mills ever did.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Says she supports Roe V. Wade

Helps usher in a supreme court that overturns Roe v. Wade

“I do not regret that vote,” she told reporters in Portland in June. She went even further after an event at a fire station in Randolph, Maine, this month.

“I would vote for him again, yes,” she said

Stupid fucking bitch

In the end, they say, her vote came down to a simple calculation: She believed Judge Kavanaugh when he said he would respect precedent, which she interpreted to mean that he would leave Roe v. Wade largely intact. And she did not believe Christine Blasey Ford, the California professor who said he sexually assaulted her when they were in high school.

I say again, stupid fucking bitch.

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 69 points 1 day ago

So keep asking her about it. Obviously

[–] paorzz@lemmy.world 63 points 1 day ago

This is paywalled. Here's the context:

Of the more than 10,000 votes cast by Senator Susan Collins of Maine, there is one that has shadowed her like no other as she runs for a sixth term.

On Oct. 6, 2018, Ms. Collins, one of only two Senate Republicans who support abortion rights, cast a deciding vote to confirm Brett M. Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court. Four years later, Justice Kavanaugh voted with the conservative majority to overturn Roe v. Wade, which had guaranteed a constitutional right to abortion for nearly half a century.

The vote cut against her well-cultivated reputation as a moderate Republican who is unafraid to break ranks. It also put her at odds with abortion rights activists, who had previously backed her campaigns, and with advocates for victims of sexual violence, who rallied behind a woman who accused Mr. Kavanaugh of sexual assault, an allegation he denied.

Now, Ms. Collins’s support for Justice Kavanaugh has become a major issue in her first re-election campaign since Roe was overturned, a race that could swing control of the Senate. The 2018 vote has emerged as a character test of Ms. Collins for Maine voters: Some consider her a principled lawmaker taking tough votes, while others see a calculating politician determined to keep her job.

Publicly, Ms. Collins appears unbowed. “I do not regret that vote,” she told reporters in Portland in June. She went even further after an event at a fire station in Randolph, Maine, this month.

“I would vote for him again, yes,” she said, according to audio acquired by an operative for American Bridge, a major Democratic super PAC.

But people who interacted with her during the Kavanaugh hearings say Ms. Collins still harbors frustrations about the continued backlash after a confirmation process she described in 2018 as “more like a caricature of a gutter-level political campaign.”

Even as she was accused of capitulating to the demands of her party and President Trump, Ms. Collins believed she took the more politically difficult vote while representing a Democratic-leaning state, she told a confidant at the time. And in the years since, she has appeared to hold grudges against people who criticized her vote.

“She takes all of it very personally,” said Dana Singiser, a former Planned Parenthood vice president, who raised concerns about Judge Kavanaugh with Ms. Collins during his confirmation process. “For us, it’s not really personal, it’s just about our mission. That was an abortion-defining vote.”

This account is based on interviews with more than two dozen former aides, Senate colleagues, activists and others involved in the confirmation process. Some spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations.

Ms. Collins declined an interview request from The New York Times. Blake Kernen, a spokeswoman for Ms. Collins, dismissed criticism of the senator’s vote as driven by “hyperpartisan voices.”

“Senator Collins fully and honestly explained her decision in the days before and the years that followed Justice Kavanaugh’s nomination,” she said.

Ms. Kernen also drew a contrast between the senator, who she said “has always been pro-choice,” and her Democratic opponent, Troy Jackson, who opposed abortion as a state lawmaker until about a decade ago. He later helped enact a Maine law that allows abortion at any stage of pregnancy, as long as a doctor deems it necessary — one of the most permissive in the country.

[–] tigermountain@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I remember her saying that Brett Kavanaugh promised her that Roe v Wade was "settled law" and that was good enough for her. My guess is she wanted to vote for him regardless and wanted something she could point to to protect herself when the inevitable blowback happened.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She takes it personally? Lies. If she had a modicum of awareness or self-respect, she’d make better choices.

If she can’t handle being accountable to her constituents, she knows where the door is.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 4 points 1 day ago

If voters had a modicim of awareness they would never, ever, trust a Republican Senator in the first place.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Also she and Murkowski only oppose unpopular vote when it won't make any difference as if it was just an act.

The moment media report that one of them is strongly against a specific bill Republicans want to pass I know it is going to pass the same day.

I don't get why their constituents are still voting for then.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I can see how Alaskans keep voting for Murkowski because she always manages to get special dispensations for Alaska in return for her vote. That's why she always acts like she "might just" vote differently than the rest of the party on bills that are important to them. Alaskans are OK with her voting with Repubs because it's a red state, and they like the special carve-outs or extra funding they get from her efforts.

Collins just plays the "might just not" game because she's in a Blue state so she has to appear more moderate and "reasonable". I don't know why Maine has put up with it for so long.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

I wish her to be unhappy everyday.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

She should kill herself then people wouldn't ask those questions

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Good. This stupid bitch should be unhappy when asked about her dirty deeds.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Her old ass is trying to die in office. What a tragedy that would be.

[–] spacegoat@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

She looks like roadkill and is worth about as much

[–] lmdnw@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’d celebrate if Collin’s got stomped to death by a moose.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 2 points 22 hours ago

The Crassus treatment, but with maple syrup.

[–] teelin134@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh? Is this the New York Times doing some journalism?

[–] ViaGetty@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

Just a little for a change, as a treat

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

She should go on a Nuremberg-style trial, and then live the rest of her life in a small solitary confinement.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments
view more: next ›