this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2026
398 points (100.0% liked)

politics

31206 readers
1955 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 84 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

$975,000 to Vindman’s $16.3m

16:1. I think that tops El Sayed.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

fabulous congratulations also to Brandon Dukes a (non commie larper) Democrat that flipped a seat in important swing state Pennsylvania.

real results from real politicians

[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

we will watch her carrier with great interest

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And this is why even if you absolutely hate the moderate asshats in the Democratic party, you should remain registered and vote in each and every primary.

Congrats to Angie Nixon on fighting the good fight and winning!

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you hate establishment Dems, voting in the primary is so very critical. And more than that, speaking up and volunteering to text people and go door-to-door if you can - provide whatever support you can BEFORE the primary, then vote in the primary.

And then, of course, vote int he general because no matter which one won the primary, establishment Dems still end up doing more for human rights than fascists.

But yeah - those who only complain in the general and worse, don't bother to vote in the general after not doing anything before either............. they are part of the problem.

[–] webadict@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Caucus. Primary. Vote. I know every state is different, but find your local Democratic party (or DSA or anything you want, really) and show up. You'll have a lot of influence there because you'll be one of like 20 people that shows up. And it really matters.

You can influence your local party and that influence puts pressure on the regional parties and so on. We lost a crucial caucus endorsement in my neck of the woods that cost a progressive the primary. And I saw how close the caucus vote was. It really does matter.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

But I ain't in no desert, I don't know what them cactus things is!

;-)

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 34 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Does the US media call every progressive Democrats' win a "surprise"?

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, because they need to maintain the narrative that progressive candidates are 'fringe' and only ever win by chance or cheating. That way when the general election comes around, potential progressive voters will be disinclined to vote for the progressive candidate, or they may just not go vote at all, because they have been convinced that the progressive can't really win.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 3 points 1 month ago

Something like that. The sometimes mystifying (to me) New York Times effect, which always seems to enable conservatives or, at best, the democrats' right wing. "We don't win against republicans because we still aren't enough like them"

[–] Eryn6844@piefed.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 month ago

it only surprise to them. we are fed up.

[–] zoloftt@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This isn't US media. It's UK.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

aww shit I should've seen that. But my statement still stands. Each time they still act like it's a surprise that people have had enough in droves.

[–] zoloftt@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, similar article by ABC says "upset". Then they compare the money that each candidate raised.... It wasn't an upset, people are angry at the mistreatment we've been going through. The money in politics is an abomination.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 2 points 1 month ago

The money in politics is an abomination.

I keep saying it. Legal corruption.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This is not a trivial win!

she won by a clear margin. Nixon received 56.1% of the vote ... ahead of Vindman’s 43.9%.

Congratulations to Angie Nixon. beating Alexander Vindman is quite an accomplishment, he was not a bad candidate for a democrat. Testifying against Trump in 2019 brought him a lot of respect, and he had more campaign money too!

[–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

IMO he was a pretty bad candidate. He gave the dems several news cycles of criticizing Trump when he testified before congress so he was kind of gifted this race by the party. He's as milquetoast as they come and completely unproven as he's never run for anything else. He would have gotten creamed in the general. We'll see how a DSA candidate performs in a statewide election in Florida.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not denying that, but he was known for standing up to trump, that can carry you a long way.

I respect his service to the country and his courage. But he wasn't going to move the needle in Florida. He wasn't even from there.

[–] Eryn6844@piefed.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

finally someone i voted for has won! go get em Angie!

[–] Ribbons@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago

Did our part as well, really cool to see!

[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

is her camping organized like Mamdanis where they rely on volunteers? If yes maybe you could even mobilize, if you feel like it

[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This isn’t a surprise, this the new normal emerging from the inhumane conditions of capitalism. People are fed up with having the value of life placed below the value of property, power and wealth.

Capitalists are deluded, distracted and pacified with pretty possessions and their lives have been reduced to mere consumption and the worth of their wealth portfolios. Wealth and property courtesy of those who toil in developing nations, on the backs of workers, in order to support lavish lifestyles of abundant consumption. None of that matters when you die.

The relationships you build with others, the impact you have on your communities and people you interact with, matter far more than how much property and wealth one can amass. The inevitable course of capitalism is the degeneration of civilizations. In the era of techno-capitalism, our communities are falling apart due to isolation and lack of true connections. Without the power to organize and collectively act, via real in-person relationships with emotional investment, we become powerless via lack of true social skills and social anxieties. Internet neurosis.

This is by design and exactly what the techno-capitalists want.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

People have been fed up for a long time and looking for change. That's what helped Obama win in 2008. Alas, the propaganda from the fascists has been pervasive since long before that, so a lot of the people fed up for now decades have been deluded into voting for what continues to make things worse.

It's not just that a lot of the establishment Dems are not only behind the times but also beholden to corporate money, dragging them right-wing; but also, even shit they DO get done always gets minimized in the media (largely owned by oligarchs who benefit from fascist laws and tax cuts) while the fascists get a lot of passes in the media for those same reasons.

I think there are a number of countries out there showing that properly regulated capitalism is probably the best practical system we have. But it has to be properly regulated. And it is a constant fight. Laws matter little if people ignore them and nobody enforces them. So no matter what system is set in place, there will always be a fight by people to corrupt it.

And the point about social changes is also true. I have my wife, and two real friends. A few acquaintences I chat with every few weeks. A few people I keep up with online but mostly in shared projects, not socially. Much of my family I've had to block for political reasons, so I have my dad and one uncle left. My stepmom, but I was an adult when lost mom and dad remarried - she's really sweet and I adore her but just don't talk much.

I think something like that - that lack of people - is probably true for most. We used to be forced to deal with our neighbors because most people didn't move around much, so for a lot of people, you'd spend decades in the same place. With the rise of communications making it easier to keep in touch remotely, it's definitely radically shifted our social construct.

I think that's one reason - when people say "all this talk online does nothing" - but this is the last marketplace of ideas we have. This is where we have left to organize. So like-minded people have to find each other somehow, and then hopefully organize on the local, regional, national levels. Because we need to organize to have protests. And protests need to happen until everyone sees there are enough of us that demand change that we can enforce that demand. So it's like an effort that must be ramped up, and talking online is the critical foundation for that, even though it's useless until we get there.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 12 points 1 month ago

Next we primary Wasserman-Schultz

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I'm glad she won. She had a great team on the ground here in FL doing the work.

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Het slogan should be:

I'm not a crook

[–] yonderbarn@lazysoci.al 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The reference would fly over the heads of Gen Z.

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It should work whether you get the reference or not. Somehow not being a corrupt grifter is an unique selling point.