this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2026
16 points (94.4% liked)

Technology

43468 readers
244 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For decades, Mozilla has been one of the strongest advocates for an open internet. Today, as artificial intelligence becomes increasingly central to how businesses and governments operate, the organization is making a similar case for open AI.

In a report published last month, Mozilla, a free software community and nonprofit project, said the performance gap between top open-source models and proprietary systems like Claude and ChatGPT has narrowed to just 3%. The report highlighted the growing popularity of open models, noting that in February 2026, Alibaba’s open-source model Qwen was downloaded more times than the next eight models combined.

The debate over open AI has gained fresh momentum after Meta released a new open-weight model on August 10, and promised more would come soon.

Raffi Krikorian, Mozilla’s chief technology officer, believes organizations need alternatives to proprietary AI systems to gain greater control over their data and infrastructure.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You mean AI should be rotten to the core with advertisement, surveillance trackers and taken over by Big Data monopolies mostly headquartered in a fascist country?

Yeah, that's pretty much where it's headed.

[–] Kissaki@beehaw.org 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's a very dark take, but not wrong, unfortunately.

[–] gankouskhan@bookwyr.me 1 points 1 week ago

Sadly that is AI of the present. A few of the leaders have already mentioned and have implemented "suggested results" in their responses, and surveillance is well.... I assume we all know that was baked in from the start.

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

How have these sycophants been allowed to seep into every position of decision making or influence.

[–] jherazob@beehaw.org 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And that's why the Mozilla organization is in decline, users beg for them to stop mucking with AI and make Firefox the unquestionably best browser in any platform, they answer with "OK, here's more AI"

[–] kittenroar@beehaw.org 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The AI in Firefox is local-only -- no data centers, no privacy leaks, no supporting big evil. And you can opt out .

[–] jherazob@beehaw.org 0 points 6 days ago

"Our FOSS Torment Nexus, which was created by evil from evil, that requires more evil to keep it updated, that fundamentally supports the evil campaign of surveillance subjugation by corrupt tech CEOs by it's very existence as an excuse they can use to point out that not every evil machine is evil, is entirely good and ethical because it's only local!" is not the brag you think it is

[–] Senal@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

If its such a compelling feature set then opt-in shouldn't be an issue.

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yes, self-hosting and small-group AI hosting needs to be legal, accessible, and feasible.

Despite the pessimistic (and largely technically incorrect) takes here, the internet is actually an incredible feat of human collaboration; the most distributed, interconnected, democratized, and resilient communication system ever built.

You'd hope that Lemmy users, being people who've mostly fled the big social media sites with at very least some marginal technical cost to themselves, wouldn't be pulling a millennial version of the boomer "AOL == The Internet" thing by treating FAANG's sites as the internet, but alas.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

I mean as a browser im moving away from firefox but I may end up using it as a standalone local llm. I would still like a gpl os flavor built around locall llm. something that is very limited on installation but with options to expand capability. Essentially something like a start trek computer.

[–] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Mozilla's leadership is still not worthy of those millions.

[–] kittenroar@beehaw.org 1 points 1 week ago

I 100% agree. The thing that makes AI evil is who owns it.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 1 week ago

Hope that guy dies.

[–] halm@leminal.space 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 3 points 1 week ago

"organizations need alternatives to proprietary AI systems to gain greater control over their data and infrastructure"