You can install the desktop app and use it without a remote server. (It installs a ‘local server’.) (Apparently. I haven't used it, but that's what the website and their docs say.)
You mean my second point does? Would you agree with, do you see my first point being independent of the process and act of such a creation?
The same applies to the creation or training process. If they trained with voice samples or have a collection of voice samples for matching, then those could serve as evidence or indications.
If you're selling or publishing a voice in a way that impersonates another person without their consent that may be identifiable and prosecutable. "Generate with x voice." 'Talk to x." Etc. Exact lettering is no necessary if intent is evident from pictures or evasive descriptions making an obvious implication.
If prosecution can find evidence of cloning/training that can also serve as basis.
In these ways it doesn't have to be about similarity of the produced voice, of quality or alternative people, at all.
"these effects" refers to the sentence right before it, "overestimating the proportion of social media users who post harmful content makes people feel more negative emotion, perceive the United States to be in greater moral decline, and cultivate distorted perceptions of what others want to see on social media".
In other words, the overstimation of >40% when it's <10% and the effects resulting from this overestimation can be mitigated through education (that it's in fact much lower).
They mention the Japanese community resignation but didn't link to anything; I'm liking the resignation because it's noteworthy especially in documenting don't concrete, specific, practical issues and also community impact.
Other languages, especially non Asian, may be less problematic outside of what this article talks about.
I wonder how it impacted other long them and occasional contributors already and going forward.
We realised administering medication without addressing these broader psychosocial needs would be failing in our duty of care.
So our study evolved to include a comprehensive support model, combining pharmacotherapy with trauma-informed clinical counselling, proactively following up participants, 24-hour crisis support, helping the men navigate support services and partner safety planning.
End to end - just like the food through your body 😏
It's definitely been a thing before Trump. A lot of corporate and publicity speak is like this. Trump is certainly the most prominent, visible, and 'obvious through exposure' figure and example of this right now though.
Biological and psychological variance is an Internet part of humanity. When you say this I'm immediately reminded of fascist ideals and efforts to 'normalize' and 'conformize' people, and not just from this side of the spectrum. So I think this is a somewhat dangerous argument to make.
At large, it's human nature to elevate these kinds of people, that's why they end up in such high positions. I'm not sure we can change that. And that's where regulations and requirements by law come in, as well as public record and press, to keep them in check.
I get the sentiment and frustration in your comment though.
The initiator wanted to introduce a new kind of look at countries, to not only look and value and rank them by gdp or happiness index but by their contributions to outside their own country. They call this good, as in doing good things rather than selfish things.
'Better' is a ranking of 'goodness' as well.
That side, do you see no good in hierarchy at all?
Part of this service is covering the risk of unforseen cost. Heating breaks? That may become expensive. You pay a monthly fee and don't have to manage risk and cost like that. Many people would be ruined if they had to cover that and repair becomes necessary, or face worsening condition.
I don't have any experience or specific knowledge about it, but I suspect these things may have significant variance between countries or even cities.
Really unfortunate and sad either way.