"In this video game, despite the random allocation of individual digital content from the Packs, the human player can use their own skills to control the course of the game with a probability suitable for success, thus establishing a rational expectation of winning," the court concluded.
Apparently it's not about the loot box itself but that what you get out of it is used in a game that involves skill.
14 days is not a long time between announcement and removal. This press article picked up on it even later/shorter. (Predictably. It takes time for the info to spread.)
If these are the models most damaging to vulnerable people their deactivation seems like a good thing though.
The free chatgpt switches to mini after x prompts in a conversation. What will it switch to now?
They leave me, just like in real life :( /s
We are on Lemmy though. It's certainly relevant to me.
I don't need it to be a popular app for others when is not for me.
The complaint cites “whistleblowers” as having helped bring this information to light, though it doesn’t explain who they are.
No substance yet.
When the pig has a public platform it can be important to respond. Not for the other, but for the audience or community. Otherwise, public discourse becomes dominated by pigs.
(Staying in your analogy. I think pigs are better than that.)
Could you link a or the source?
The post links an image, and the description links a page with a login screen.
Dark humor is a coping mechanism. Venting elsewhere doesn't tell us anything about their communication style.
I don't see anything that would warrant blaming her here.
This is literally how all of law, terms, regulations, and moderation work. The collective or defining party defines a set of rules.
The rules obviously don't prevent lying or ignoring the rules, but they set the baseline to moderate and act with. Without the rule, Bandcamp would not remove such content, and people could not reclaim their money, and nobody could sue the publishers.
I don't think it's a bad thing. And it's not weakness. Is humanizing. Is the alternative model to showy leaders. Being human and vulnerable can be great for rallying support and empathy.
As long as actions remain firm and decisive, being human does not change those.
For a democratic human system vulnerable humans seem appropriate leaders. As long as they're competent and caring for the right things.
Then it seems like a strategic move alongside locking higher playback speeds behind premium as well.
UI and player control on payed tiers when it makes no technical difference to them as a delivery platform.