Quoting the teaser text
Google’s Pixel 10 works with AirDrop, and other phones should follow later.
Quoting the teaser text
Google’s Pixel 10 works with AirDrop, and other phones should follow later.
How do you rsync between an android and iOS device? Is it as simple as airdrop?
How many people did you betray until now? :p
Grapple Dog, was gifted to me via giveaway. It's pretty good, a decent enough title.
I like weird. Of course they mean something different when they say weird.
Regarding your last point, it seemed pretty clear to me that they gave only one or few URLs to AdGuard, AdGuard informed archivetoday, and they removed that content. What they're saying here is that the other URLs, the other illegal content they did not even disclose URLs to, still exist and have not been removed. Which is obvious, why would they have been removed when they are not known or reported.
This understanding of mine is supported by their text earlier in the document where they talk about having shared only few of those they know of, and that these are available upon request by law enforcement or adguard.
All of this still leaves open why they do not report the illegal content themselves, so that it gets removed. And the answer seems likely to be: So they can report to proxies with the intention that archivetoday gets blocked on "proxy" services.
It they're not willing to admit fault then they're inevitably announcing or implying standing opposite to and working against their workers.
If you run a retail shop or a diner, isn’t it easier to just calculate how much the merchant fee costs as a percentage of your total revenues and then spread out a small price increase among all your products, where the impact would be barely noticed?
How would that kind of collection, calculation,and estimation be easier than a simple provider to cost association?
The suggestion is a subsidy to the more expensive providers at the cost of the cheaper ones. Make of that what you will.
Will a customer care if they’re paying $12.50 or $12.75 for a burger? No. Will they raise an eyebrow because you’re charging an additional fee on top of the entire bill because – gasp – they don’t use cash? Yes, they will.
Making cost and fees obvious doesn't sound to bad. It informs the consumer, with transpanency and opportunity.
“To distract me from going into science, I'm gonna play a game while recording [/talking].”
lol wut
Starts to talk physics/specifics anyway…
The org in question, website linked to in the article, published a response/"rebuttal" press release.
I shared my assessment and conclusions from reading it in this comment.
The AdGuard post is certainly much more convincing than their “rebuttal” with logical errors and misrepresentations.
The Haiket website doesn't seem to disclose anything about the people, company, org, or group behind it.
The privacy policy does not disclose them as processors by name either.
The privacy policy GDPR section does not talk about shared information, presumably because they don't because they can't without consent, but the California section says:
Please see the "Do Not Sell My Personal Information" section and "Limit the Use or Disclosure of My Sensitive Personal Information" section for more information on how to opt out and limit the use of sensitive information collected.
Implying a default no-explicit-consent selling of personal and sensitive personal information outside of the GDPR regions.
Help, my cat stepped on the button, how do I recover my data?
Looks like they prevent that.