this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2026
293 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30937 readers
1927 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dryad@lemmy.world 46 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s radical to think the billionaire deserves a second private jet more than your mom deserves cancer treatment.

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 23 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

or even a first private jet.

[–] moustachio@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Or even to exist in society

[–] credo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

You don’t expect them to share a jet with another billionaire do you? Those guys are assholes.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 32 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Favorite one so far was El-Sayed rattling off all the Republicans who made up "white names" to hide their ethnic backgrounds when asked about "identity politics".

As much as Republicans are hung up on "legal names" there's a shit ton of them that just made up white sounding names and their voters don't recognize them by their legal names.

Rafael Cruz is the obvious one, but there's a shit ton of others doing it too.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Link to video?

[–] PhatalFlaw@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I know I deserve healthcare, but I just don't think I should have to pay for everybody else because they're a bunch of freeloaders. -Republicans

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Tax payer funded healthcare is socialism"

  • Republican politicians whose top notch healthcare is funded by tax players
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago

The health care of senators is leagues above that of the common American

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Damn those freeloaders! Also, keep your hands off my medicaid and disability - if I can live without gummit assistance, so can everyone else!

(that hurt me to type)

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 5 points 2 weeks ago

I read "dying of whiteness" a couple months ago and it's literally that sometimes. Some people would rather die than let those people have nice things.

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 25 points 2 weeks ago

It's TERRORISM to use Tax Dollars on PEOPLE and NOT Billionaires!

-Republicans LITERALLY!

[–] savvie@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 weeks ago

yes, please…healthcare not wealthcare

[–] SalamiDommie@lemmus.org 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Huge corporations just keep taking for themselves and don't give back in return what they have received.

So we should mandate... Giving them a blank check through gov spending and low accountability...

Yup - makes sense.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What are you talking about...all those tax breaks they need... otherwise they might not be able to pay the CEO their bonuses... I mean seriously think of those people for once. What are we supposed to do let them fail? No gotta bail them out when they fuck up.

[–] SalamiDommie@lemmus.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

I agree with you... But I think we are talking about different things.

[–] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 weeks ago

There's like a million and a half or more pieces of evidence that this country is at a minimum bordering on the edge of being cooked, and the Medicare For All / Healthcare For All topic is definitely in there.

In a nearby county, there's a hospital that will almost certainly close once the Medicare cuts take effect. It's a well-known thing. Only hospital in that county. Next closest hospitals for most residents are 20 - 30 miles (30 - 50 km) further away, which translates to at least an additional 20 minutes for emergency transport.

We're out there trying to make people aware of the situation, and decided to have a "protest" which was basically just holding up signs along the main road. Some people had signs like "Medicaid for all" or "healthcare for all", things like that. I know of at least 3 passers by who shouted out their windows some variation of "How are we going to pay for it?"

Honestly, just vile and willfully ignorant people exist in this world. Irredeemably evil. And you know they'll be the first ones whining on TV when their son or wife or daddy died because they didn't make it to the hospital in time.

Really, I hope charismatic progressives can help change enough minds that the evil cowards against the greater good no longer pull the strings because those people are such shits that they won't even stop to have a respectful conversation that might actually answer the question they posed about how to pay.

It might not be a radical idea, but it is, in fact, totally radical, dude.

Uh, actually it is.

Radical change means fundamental change (stemming from the root). Currently the US has for profit healthcare that's only available to the rich.

Changing that to something like single payer where everyone gets free healthcare is a radical change. And that's a good thing.