this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
301 points (99.0% liked)

memes

22215 readers
3264 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/46041339

Imagine if behind-the-scenes they were and the rise of AI was actually fuelling itself? A most disturbing prospect

top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xkbx@startrek.website 53 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Possibility? I thought we knew this was happening for real?

[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago

Based on the number of c levels I deal with daily who can't function without AI, I certainly knew this

[–] kernelle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

it's not an "annoying cookie banner warning", it's a paywall (lol that sounded so AI i promise im not chatgpt)

you either pay with money or your privacy

[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 29 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Here's a video clip of an interview with Masayoshi Son, the CEO of SoftBank (who is heavily invested in AI) saying he talks to ChatGPT for 2-3 hours every day

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago

" I used to talk to people everyday, but they kept disagreeing with me so I stopped. " - him probably

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago

This man has mush for brains at this point. And CEO brains are already quite mushy to begin with.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 23 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's not just plausible; it's 100% happening. I've seen it with our CEO, with my own eyes. I've seen it reported by other C-Staff in other companies. I've seen CEO's directly requote chatbot results.

It's not a stretch. They've had yes men for decades. AI is the ultimate Yes Man, focus on getting you what you ask for, minimize negativity, ignore the skeletons you're creating.

[–] Hasherm0n@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I've seen the CTO of my company straight up use Claude to respond to slack messages.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago

Yeah, it's crazy how all of a sudden people who never used an EM dash or even a fucking semi-colon before now have them everywhere.

But it takes a CEO to leave the emoji bullet points in and pass it off as their own.

[–] sheridan@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Snake oil salesmen drinking their own snake oil.

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

It's probably why they all like it so much. AI speaks bullshit and bullshit is the language they speak.

[–] Elting@piefed.social 16 points 6 days ago

Of course they are, LLMs have been optimized for performing the fellatio of c-suites for a reason. Sycophancy might not appeal to you, but who do we all know loves a brown noser?

[–] eurodyne@piefed.world 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Dirty coporats. I guess ‘ol Johnny Silverhand is gonna have to blow up Arasaka tower again.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 11 points 6 days ago

Possibility? I think it'd be easier to point out which CEOs weren't making AI decisions based on discussions with chatbots.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Altman has literally said his plan to become profitable is to build a chatbot good enough and then ask it. And that he can't imagine being a parent without relying on chatgpt for everything

[–] TheAntiAiLeader@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And he got to be in that position of power… how? Makes you wonder what goes on behind the scenes 🧐🤔

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

Eh... it is the job of the CEO to promote the company and products they sell. And that's what he's doing there.

What concerns me more is how many people believe the obvious bullshit the tech bros say.

[–] tarball@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

My former boss was doing exactly that and I wish I was joking

That sounds like a painful work environment

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

You wake up in your AI bed, eat your AI breakfast, drive your AI car, work at your AI job, go on your AI lunch break, and then get fired and replaced by a 11 year old Chinese child.

[–] whereitsat@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

what's the difference?

people need to stop holding individuals on a pedestal because of wealth/status.

if i came up with the idea for the first internet payment processor, it doesn't mean i know jack fucking shit about anything else in life--it just means i had a good idea; it means i was in the right place at the right time; i was there with the right amount of cash to take advantage of the situation.

i don't care about your opinions on the environment or history or the future of mankind anymore than i do the ones coming from the fingers of every know-nothing on social media.

the biggest question is: who the fuck made these people god, or at least the architects of the future, of humanity? did we have a vote on it?

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The CEO of the company I work for hasn't had an original thought since 2024.

Which is fine — his original thoughts were all garbage anyway.

Your comment has made my day

[–] bloogoose@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

People who require their egos to be stroked using the Ego Stroker 3000. AI is a fleshlight for narcissists.

Or like a cesspool for narcissists

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I saw a Claude log on a screen share yesterday where the dude was seriously using Claude to add two numbers together. This and things much stupider than this have been happening the whole time.

That does not thrill me with confidence for this or any future generation

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Hmmm... I use google to do math all the time. It's kinda nice, you can put units in and put the results in in the correct units.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago

How to admit you don't know what a calculator is without admitting it.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Dude there wasn't any units. This was seriously something you could type into a python repl, an excel cell, or even windows calculator.

[–] shiftymccool@piefed.ca 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Or, here's a wild idea, use your brain

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

But but but that causes thinky pain

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Can you type in "80 mph * 420 minutes in km" into excel and get an answer?

Using google is useful because it will understand the units, which can serve as a check. If the units match what you're expecting you know you got the formula right.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Again there was no units in what this dude had in his Claude chat. It was a simple addition of two numbers.

I know that people on the Internet love to argue, but Jesus tapdancing Christ man could you at least read before responding?

[–] vane@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

It's happening. Also politicians do it. Current laws are created by AI for AI. We humans are deprecated.

[–] RoddyStiggs@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I thought this was a foregone conclusion.

Pretty much. Though some still don’t know

[–] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

They absolutely are. The AIs are quite literally building themselves

[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 days ago
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

You can try asking AIs about their usefulness, cost effectiveness, and sustainability. Their answers vary much more than the CEOs'.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

How could you tell? Using AI to think for them and thinking for themselves leads go the same outcomes.

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

Plausible. Their only C-suite objective is a fiduciary responsibility to shareholders and their wallets.