322
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A new lawsuit by Seattle Children’s pits the hospital against the Texas Attorney General’s office, amid a national fight over privacy for children seeking gender-affirming care.

In the lawsuit, filed this month in Travis County, Texas, District Court, Seattle Children’s is aiming to protect patient information of Texans who left their home state, where it’s illegal for minors to access gender-affirming care, to seek treatment here, where it is legal.

It also invokes Washington’s new shield law, legislation state lawmakers approved earlier this year to protect hospitals from being forced to share information about transgender and gender diverse children who are seeking medical care. Many Democrat-led states have passed similar shield laws, fearing that people crossing state lines for abortions and gender-affirming care could be prosecuted as more Republican-led states continue to pass laws restricting access to these services.

Children’s filed the new lawsuit after the office of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton served the hospital with a civil investigative demand in late November, according to the complaint. The request sought information about patients from Texas who had received gender-affirming care services from Children’s, including details related to diagnoses, medications prescribed, laboratory testing and other treatment protocols.

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 110 points 10 months ago

Dear Texas government,

Get fucked.

Kindest regards,

Washington State Residents

[-] Ender2k@kbin.social 17 points 10 months ago

Really glad to see SCH go to bat here.

We all have things we can do.

#ProtectTransKids

[-] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

Not just the Texas Government, but the AG Ken Paxton in particular. And Gregg Abbott as well.

[-] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 46 points 10 months ago

This is a violation of HIPAA and the rights of patients to privacy.

[-] SquishyPandaDev@yiffit.net 28 points 10 months ago

This is going to end up in front of the Supreme court. And we all know how this is going to go. Kiss your rights good buy. Say hello to transgender and abortion bounty hunters. I fucking hate this god damn country

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago

I actually kind of doubt that. That would open up a massive can of worms with regards to jurisdiction.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Some judges are already demolishing standing. The Texas judge in the Mifepristone case ruled that the doctors suing to stop the drug had standing even though they weren't hurt yet by the drug's use. The fact that they claimed that they might be hurt at some hypothetical point in the future was standing enough.

Meanwhile, in another case, a judge ruled that citizens don't have standing to sue over infringements to their voting rights.

If they demolish standing, why not destroy jurisdiction as well? Of course, a ruling from the Supreme Court would likely be worded in such a way that red states could get anything they wanted while blue states had no rights to request anything.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

They are destroying some kinds of standing, maybe it is better phrased. Offended observer is basically gone every time some non-christian tries to use it. In the land that disestablished the Church it is now lawful for state officials to lead Christian prayers at high school sporting events

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago

I dont. The Catholics on the court will get their marching orders from the Vatican and Thomas will get his new boat.

They will just say that the kid is a resident of the state and as such the state has a compelling interest in knowing what is happening medically with the child even outside of state lines. Either that or they will argue that since bounty hunters aren't state officials none of the rules really apply. Welcome to the new world where people can just stand outside hospitals and report every kid coming in just so they can shot gun it to bounty land

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

I’d love to see them try it.

[-] sapient_cogbag@infosec.pub 20 points 10 months ago

Building a government list of members of a minority group. What could possibly go wrong...

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 16 points 10 months ago

Proud to live where people’s rights are respected. Way to go Seattle!

this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
322 points (98.2% liked)

News

23305 readers
3550 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS