this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
453 points (99.3% liked)

politics

30610 readers
3626 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
453
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by Deep@mander.xyz to c/politics@lemmy.world
 

A slim majority of voting Democrats defied leader Jeffries, backing failed Massie amendment to cut $3.3 billion

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 141 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The other half better lose their next primary.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Judging from 2024, the angry voters will do ABSOULTELY NOTHING, while hoping the ship will kinda, sorta, right itself-ish.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Judging from 2024, the ~~angry voters~~ unpopular Dems will do ABSOULTELY NOTHING

Fixed it for you.

Also, more recent events such as Mamdani and candidates he endorsed beating "Centrist" (actually right wing to far right) establishment Dems who had the backing of the entire DNC machine would indicate that the angry voters ARE doing something.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BeanGoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 101 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 48 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Plus all of the Republicans.

(Yes, I know the fascist fucks are a lost cause and that's why they don't get mentioned, but we should still maintain the expectation anyway.)

[–] aaa999@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

nothing to apologize for, not mentioning republicans in these situations leads directly to .ml style dumbdumbitis

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 98 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

If you still feel like you need to provide "aid" to a country with a higher QoL than yours, higher ranking healthcare and education than yours, better-equipped social services than yours, and higher GDP per capita, you are a sad, brainwashed, controlled paypiggy.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Israel has lower gdp per capita ($60k PPP) then the US ($94k).

This is just to say they're providing that better qol despite having less money.

[–] Blibly@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Because we are paying for it. Yet we don't have enough for our own people?!?

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

It's also easy to boost the standard of living of some when you deny the rights of others.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

America QoL is fucked not because they're paying for others, but because of inequality.

In the US, GDP per working person (or, how much money each worker generates) is well over $150k.

Wages are less than half that, on average.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

They subsidize billionaires who then lobby against everyone else's interest to increase inequality.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

does that GDP number include the billions we give them in aid? We give them far far far more than the 3.8 billion thats advertised. 3.8 billion directly plus another 12.5 billion in military aid just in 2024. And I imagine similar in 2025 but dont have the data. What could America have done with a spare ~17 billion? and thats not even counting the horrifyingly expensive missiles we expend to protect them, military operations in the region to benefit them, the wars we engage in at their whim that only serve their interests. When you factor in the wars we are probably a trillion dollars into supporting these genocidal chucklefucks.

https://www.cfr.org/articles/us-aid-israel-four-charts

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, Israel is playing build-a-Reich and America is paying for it.

However, that's not the reason why Americans are struggling - monstrous income inequality and zero social policies are the main ones.

Go out and vote out every incumbent bloodsucker out in primaries, like in the recent NY primaries.

Keep it up for 6 years, and it will cause a literal revolution in America.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

What could America have done with a spare ~17 billion?

COULD have done a lot, WOULD probably just squander it on wars, tax breaks for billionaires, and subsidies for the companies of billionaires.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

They have interest in the banks who own the fed. We pay more in intetest on our debt that we spend on defense. That's where it comes from. Plus all the other wealth. It's way bigger than you think.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Our politicians are bought and paid for by Israel. The US is being colonized by Israel.

[–] Iusedtobeanalien@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Trump is donating millions to Europeam maga aligned groups, those millions are taxpayers dollars. Not in the same orbit but completely unacceptable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 39 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago

Big improvement, unfortunately.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 33 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

As a JEW I'm TERRIFIED now! I CANT believe Lawmakers think it's OK to NOT send our Tax Dollars to a Foreign Country I'll NEVER Visit so they can have things I'll NEVER Have while SABOTAGING the Iran Conflict by CONTINUALLY Shooting babies in the Face! I'm TERRIFIED!

[–] Iusedtobeanalien@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

AIPAC has bribed US politicians into compliance an act that is completely illegal in Israel

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 32 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] corbindallas@fedinsfw.app 6 points 2 weeks ago
[–] nanometer1625@thelemmy.club 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Jfc the USA government can't afford CSS?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

That's bloat.

[–] nanometer1625@thelemmy.club 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The tide is turning in our favor. No military aid to warmongers!

[–] thebasementcakes@leminal.space 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Cue 6 op eds explaining how some Jewish person is scared because of this vote, meanwhile no op eds from the genocide victim families

[–] BigBoyShuanzee@aussie.zone 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Very nice to see. Israel is a terrorist state. But I'm sure Chuck Schumer vetoed it all.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

If the Senate flips in the Midterms, one of the first things they need to do is replace Schmuck as leader, then investigate him. He couldn't have done a worse job as Senate minority leader if he'd been paid, and they should make sure that wasn't the case.

He doesn't get to do the worst job of any minority leader in history, and just walk away with over $200 million in insider trading, and who knows what other corruption, without explaining himself. He needs to leave in humiliating fashion, explaining to America how he thought supporting Israel and Insider Trading was more important to him than getting health care for Americans, or even preserving the shitty system we had.

Ending the government shutdown last Fall, and surrendering our health care, just as the pressure was starting to work, was one of the worst government betrayals I've ever witnessed. How the MAGA comedy duo of Schmuck & Jeffries weren't forced to resign in humiliation is beyond me.

He needs to leave in public disgrace, that's what he's EARNED.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Idk about worst minority leader in history...Dennis Hastert did all of that, plus fucked kids.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] daannii@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (15 children)

I heard an interesting theory from a YouTube video creator who made political videos (can't recall who)

But the gist was this.

Democratic reps and congressmen take turns voting against the people's wishes. So that no single one has a long track record of going against the people. Just a handful of times.

With, of course, the majority vote being orchestrated behind the doors.

This is how so many of Trump's cabinet picks had Dems voting for them but a different Dem every time.

So no single Dem could be called out for "always voting with Republicans".

I think this woman who theorized this is on to something. Wish I could remember who it was. But yeah I think she's right. It's all orchestrated.

The Dems are intentionally losing bills and budgets that the people want.

They have been, and are currently, working with the "opposition". Because most of both sides are actually all working for Israel's goals And billionaire's goals.

Certainly Not ours.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I've heard this from a lot of leftist streamers and youtube creators as "rotating villain" theory. It's basically proven, as only when a majority is gained do congress people start flaking off of what should be an obvious win. Leiberman, Sinema, Cuellar, Fetterman, Manchin, etc.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, those people were notoriously loyal otherwise...

Or maybe these same people all tend to come up on close votes and we don't pay attention to who voted for or against the housing reform bill that just passed because they didn't matter this time.

Either name a dem that voted against the housing reform bill or drop "rotating villain" as the always go-to theory.

It's a good thing to keep it mind, but it generally isn't applying in this political environment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Isthisreddit@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Same donors, same team

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

Jeffries is such a bitch.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

defied Jefferies

Bullshit

In a lengthy statement the day before the vote, Jeffries said that the amendment was “overly broad” because it would limit “funds for longstanding initiatives,” including refugee resettlement and peacebuilding, and that it would “restrict our country’s ability to confront Hamas, Hezbollah and other terrorist organizations.”

Jeffries said he would not whip other members to vote against the amendment and acknowledged that urgent changes were needed to American policy toward Israel.

He didn't think it was pro-Israel enough, but wouldn't organize Dem votes against it.

Don't let neoliberals pretend to be progressive

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And the other half has still not understood or is up to the neck in AIPAC bribes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 10 points 2 weeks ago

disgusted by my rep voting against.

Susan DelBene has ro go. Thankfully she's got a primary opponent who looks quite a lot better.

if you're in WA-01 district, pay attention: https://www.electhunter.com/#JOINME

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

yeah, seems like Israel can do just fine without ~~my~~ our tax dollars.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Arancello@aussie.zone 8 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

that result tells us again, that Israel controls the usa. Its ok to fund genocide. your tax dollars at work.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] corbindallas@fedinsfw.app 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

random complaint

FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 243 (Republicans in roman; Democrats in italic; Independents underlined)

this page is fucking terrible, why the fuck cant they just make this page well? tables, shit fonts, fuck this technical team

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

3/4 of Congress are traitors

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 4 points 2 weeks ago

That's approximately 50% more of them than I expected, so that's nice.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 4 points 2 weeks ago
[–] BarnWolf@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments
view more: next ›