this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
261 points (98.5% liked)

movies

3748 readers
353 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 149 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

There is a beautiful version of Moana already. I can't imagine needing to see this. I don't hate these remakes for existing, but I just don't see the point.

[–] BigShammy80@feddit.org 37 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No one does... any why should they? The classic disney films are great, they don't need remakes...

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 33 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I wish someone re-mastered the Donald duck and Goofy driving instructional/documentary videos/movies

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 15 points 3 weeks ago

Goofy teaching how to play sports was great, too. Basketball game starts, players jump and start slapping one another

[–] mereo@piefed.ca 27 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Studios don't like risks nowadays. So they'd rather remake successful past movies.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 58 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Apparently it's not as risk-free as they thought.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 30 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Ah yes, losing $100,000,000 seems very low-risk.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] troed@fedia.io 102 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

My daughter loves the Moana movies. I've told her about this one - and the anti-excitement of "the same movie but with actual persons" is quite obvious. I can only conclude that no actual parents were involved in its inception.

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Friend, I am positively obsessed with mermaid movies. I have watched some of the worst movies in existence, just to watch mermaids flop around in water and look pretty. I didn't even bother with the live action remake of the little mermaid. It looked so fucking shit, I couldn't even pretend to care. And I also didn't understand them casting Halle, because she's such a soft an gentle soul and not at all like Ariel. Her sister, Chloe would have been a better Ariel because she has that similar spark of defiance in her that Ariel needs (I used to watch their youtube channel back in the day because I liked their singing). But eh, I guess. I'm just glad that Halle had an overall good experience with the film and that her career appears to be going well.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] carbonari_sandwich@piefed.social 69 points 3 weeks ago (18 children)

Here's my pitch: Let's animate the live action Disney movies. They have these properties to draw from, and instead of making a live-action remake of them like Freaky Friday or Herbie, or a sequel like Hocus Pocus or Mary Poppins Returns, reinvent it as an animated feature.

  • 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (1954)
  • The Shaggy Dog (1959)
  • Pollyanna (1960)
  • The Absent-Minded Professor (1961)
  • The Three Lives of Thomasina (1964)
  • Bedknobs and Broomsticks (1971)
  • Escape to Witch Mountain (1975)
  • The Cat from Outer Space (1978)
  • Honey, I Shrunk the Kids (1989)
  • White Fang (1991)
  • The Rocketeer (1991)
  • Newsies (1992)
  • The Mighty Ducks (1992)
  • The Adventures of Huck Finn (1993)
  • Cool Runnings (1993)
  • Blank Check (1994)
  • Heavyweights (1995)
  • A Kid in King Arthur's Court (1995)
  • George of the Jungle (1997)
  • Air Bud (1997)
  • RocketMan (1997)
  • Inspector Gadget (1999)
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 29 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Bedknobs and Broomsticks but the animated parts are live action…

Incidentally Bedknobs and Broomsticks is the better Mary Poppins, I know I know it’s an unpopular opinion but I stand by it.

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I agree! As a kid I was obsessed by the final battle between the Nazis and the animated armors!

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

ah, but would Di$ney risk possibly alienating a few movie goers by depicting Nazis as bad and incompetent today?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Honey I Shrunk the Kids would make a great animated movie, and Rick Morranis could reprise his role!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That’s remake of The Absent-Minded Professor which is on the list.

[–] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh I didn't realize they were one and the same!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 46 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
  • Makes an live-action version
  • It's 90-95% CGI

What's the point?

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago

From that studio that gave you "Live Action" Lion King.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Good

Pray this is the end of this live action shit

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

They probably needed a tax writeoff or whatever, so don't keep your hopes up

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 9 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Yes. They will definitely get the message, this time.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 34 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Really proves how simple-minded these people were. They were creating cashgrab nostalgia remakes in a manner that snubs royalties to original crews who worked on the original films, but they couldn't even tell remaking a modern film with no nostalgia value was a bad idea.

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 18 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Is Moana even old enough to HAVE Nostalgia? Isn't Moana like, 5 years old or something?

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

It’s not quite 10 years old. The animated version (and I hate I now need to qualify that) came out November 23, 2016. Still way too soon for a remake, especially when you don’t even recast the second name on the call sheet.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Ten years. Still not old enough. To maximize nostalgia, they would have to wait until those who enjoyed the original movie have their own children of the right age, so at least 20-25 years. Which, to nobody's surprise, neatly matches the time span between original and remake for The Lion King (25 years) and The Beauty and the Beast (26 years). For The Little Mermaid, they waited even longer (34 years).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 32 points 3 weeks ago

Disney: Every one of our animated films requires a half-hearted live-action remake.

Everyone else: No.

[–] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 30 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)

I mean...I already watched this movie like 10 years ago. I know what happens already.

OK, Maui is now The Rock in a muscle suit and a wig. But most of the new movie is CGI. The original movie was also animated. Why do I need to watch the new one?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mintiefresh@piefed.ca 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Nobody asked for this movie.

[–] Trex202@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 8 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I remember seeing a headline of "how The Rock co-opted Hollywood" some time ago, guess he really has a lot of influence there?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] accideath@feddit.org 22 points 3 weeks ago

Moana is probably my favourite animated movie. I see absolute zero reason to watch the remake.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Let’s dump all the charm and character of the famously last major hand-drawn animation and cover it in slop.

Wait, why aren’t people fighting to give us their money?!?!

[–] davetortoise@reddthat.com 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 12 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I’m an idiot. And/or didn’t have my coffee yet.

I was thinking of Lilo And Stitch.

[–] davetortoise@reddthat.com 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Hand-drawn moana is an excellent idea actually

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

I didn't even know it was coming out and even after seeing this post I still don't care enough to click the article

Feels fucking good leaving this nasty-ass comment though haha

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Yes, but at least the intellectual property claim lasts ten years longer.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s pretty obvious:

  • too soon for nostalgia
  • half the movie and characters is animated anyways

Plus Moana was all about the vibrant colors and visuals.

How the live action looks so lifeless and this was considered acceptable baffles me. Even when the teaser was first shown many had complaints that it looked nothing like the source material in terms of vibrancy and color choices.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 10 points 3 weeks ago

Feels pretty disrespectful to the audience of the original, like “you watched an animation but it’s a real movie now!”, except the real movie is just as much an animation.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 weeks ago

We. Don’t. Need. To. Live. Action. Every. FUCKING. Thing.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

The hierarchy of power in the live-action remake universe is about to change.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So far all their live remakes have flopped, why do they continue this shit

[–] TheImpressiveX@piefed.social 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So far all their live remakes have flopped

Aladdin, Lion King, and Lilo & Stitch have all been financial successes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 2 weeks ago

Good.

Disney's live action remakes are wank, and I'm really not sure why they started doing it or are continuing with it.

This is pure CEO "no, it's the children who are wrong" mentality.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

People might want to take their kids to see a movie that they liked when they were a kid. Or just go see it themselves for nostalgia. Live action remakes aren't going to be as good as the original animated movie but they are a little twist on something familiar.

The original animated version of Moana came out 10 years ago. The kids who may have loved this movie ten years ago don't have their own children yet, and haven't reached the age where they're all that nostalgic for something from when they were a kid. People in their early 20s want to experience new things, they aren't at an age where they want to revisit something from their youth.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheVoiceOfRaison@thelemmy.club 8 points 3 weeks ago

Good, hopefully this will serve as a message to stop making pointless live action remakes. The fact they didnt cast the original voice actress for the lead role is bewildering, but maybe she read between the lines and didn't want it.

load more comments
view more: next ›