this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
61 points (96.9% liked)

movies

3812 readers
155 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hubbubbub@fedia.io 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well it was good while it lasted...

[–] Seimhe@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I wonder if a fediverse-friendly version exists. It would need to be slick to get the critical mass that makes those kinds of sites useful (like review sites, etc).

[–] popcar2@piefed.ca 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There is NeoDB which is great software, but its official instance is mostly Chinese. I don't know if there are any ones that are mainly English, but I'd be down to join one.

[–] _m_cubed_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It looks like eggplant.place is a primarily English instance. I don’t know if there are any others.

[–] okwithmydecay@leminal.space 4 points 1 month ago

In theory it wouldn't be difficult to build an alternative for the Fediverse. Letterboxd gets its film data from TMDB, which has an API that is free for non-commercial use.

[–] edg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A fork of Bookwyrm.social?

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Big federated version for all those sites would be awesome! The problem is probably that there are already like 12 different ones

[–] popcar2@piefed.ca 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Whew, I'm feeling pretty good for not using Letterboxd as I was considering moving to it a while back. The platform started off good but it kind of devolved into every review trying to be a funny one liner instead of actually reviewing the movie.

I also found it very weird that Letterboxd doesn't have any TV shows, it's only movies.

[–] alakey@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They promised show support years ago but for some reason people were really insistent that LB should remain movie only.

[–] Deebster@infosec.pub 3 points 1 month ago

It's been announced as coming "later this year" for the last three years.

[–] LuckyDevil@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I only recently started using Letterboxd and I noticed the same thing about their movie reviews. Everyone tries to come up with the snarkiest comment that will get voted to the very top.

[–] keyez@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It became that way shortly after it blew up a year or so ago. If you find some reviewers you like or have similar taste, just seeing their reviews on top and browsing their lists makes the site a lot more friendly.

[–] keyez@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There are certain TV series on letterboxd now, though not sure you can filter for them specifically. The only way I've been able to tell us runtime being several hours.

For example Pam & Tommy (2022) is a limited series on there plus Lessons in Chemistry (2023).

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

I fucking hate capitalism

[–] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 14 points 1 month ago

Letterboxd getting cancelled after season 3 somehow.

[–] neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 month ago

Refused to use it. Advised other people to avoid it.

The opposite of the fell-for-it-again award is a Cassandra. She's like an Oscar, but for being right about bad things.

[–] orionsbelt@midwest.social 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

rotten tomatoes is owned by Fandango, IMDB by Amazon, so this makes sense (in the worst way).

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What do you think is the reason? I would assume it's mostly for their data? Or would they need with the ranking to help their movies?

[–] orionsbelt@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

i would guess it’s to help rank their own content.

the user data is a bonus.

[–] Wistful@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Aw man, that sucks, since there isn't really a good alternative for it.

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

IIRC they all use the same database as the backend. It's not better than the others. That guy mentioned Trakt.tv and it seems to be a good alternative.

Private equity destroys the world.

[–] srasmus@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I used Letterboxd for a single summer, and have since moved entirely to Trakt.tv. So far like it way more.

[–] jonesy@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago

I used trakt for years and the new v3 UI is such garbage, combined with jacking the price up I jumped ship rather than keep dealing with them. They still offer the far superior V2 UI, but only for paying subscribers.

[–] LuckyDevil@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Man, I was just starting to switch over to Letterboxd because IMDB now requires I have an account to read reviews... If this goes through it's only a matter of time before the enshittification begins. We need to create a decentralized movie/tv review site!

[–] _m_cubed_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're in luck because there’s at least one already. Check out NeoDB.

[–] LuckyDevil@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

Thanks, i'll check it out!

[–] jonesy@aussie.zone 4 points 1 month ago

For fucks' sake, I just moved to Letterboxd after Trakt decided to force their dogs but new UI on everyone and quadruple their premium costs, this sucks.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago
[–] bmpvy@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

Wähhhh I don't like this at all

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Cloudstream and its various extensions have allowed me to keep track of my movies, thank you very much.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

Shhhhhh!!! You trying to put them under a microscope again?