this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2026
285 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

86046 readers
3282 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 2 points 2 hours ago

So we know that he is actively harming young people on Instagram. We know that he was showing ads for CASM content in India and is profitering from that. He know wants to hook young people on gambling. Maybe he should get a restraining order preventing him from interacting with children at all.

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder how effectively those glasses would protect his face from a baseball bat swung at full force. Probably not very well, but I'd pay good money to see it tested on him all the same.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

android bodies likely wont feel any pain. his chassis has been reinforced through BJJ training.

[–] catdog@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Mark Zuckerberg shizzle sounds eaga to get young peeps hooked on online gamblin

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Another sign that billionaires and Zuckerberg especially, have completely become out of touch with the rest of humanity.

We are merely consumers to them.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 1 points 5 hours ago

Always were. They simply have to come up with more ways to squeeze the rest out of their userbase to justify investments.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 10 points 10 hours ago

Meta is desperate to corner the market on something, anything.

[–] NM_Gringo@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Tax that dweed fuck so much he's afraid to show his face in public.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world -1 points 2 hours ago

Why or how would a tax do that?

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

Have you seen any of the games that are available on Android and iOS devices for kids to play? They have been priming children for gambling for many many years. The sounds and visuals they use in the way they introduce prizes and features as rewards for playing mini games and various "mystery box" items they can get. They are virtually identical to any and all gambling apps as well as casino slot machines.

[–] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 56 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

He's eager for anything to help him gain more wealth, because he doesn't have enough yet and enough is never enough.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago

AI slop is costing him more money than his android brain likes to admit.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 23 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

That's the thing I think I'll die never understanding. I really don't see the point of being on your death bed with plenty of leftovers.

Some people have a really backwards understanding on the core philosophy of "being successful in life". Like, he seems to lack the ability to grasp the literal meaning of that concept and so will always be doomed to fail at achieving anything with it. It just makes sense to understand he has a psychological deficit. I'd be empathetic if he weren't such a catastrophic burden to everyone.

[–] mrpollo@lemmy.zip 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Probably just a dick measuring contest among themselves. It’s pathetic.

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Exactly. How embarrassing to have your 140 ft yacht passed by your rivals 165ft yacht that neither of you could drive, repair, navigate, service, fuel, register, or even crew yourself.

[–] Hond@piefed.social 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I feel like it is in human nature. Its in most of us. But basically all of us encounter this only with video games. Like incremental games were the numbers most go up and it is deeply satisfying even though a lot of them have a deeply disturbing meta-subplot going on while you progress through absurd numbers. Had the same feeling with the ye old Sim City titles. At the start you might roleplay as a "good" virtual mayor but at some point you probably reach the point where you are going to plane entire neighborhoods to build high-rises with fake water-access to min-max your economy on the limited space you are given. The games are already abstract to begin with but with time the abstraction layer gets to the point where you try to game the given rules of the designer.

I'm no expert. But i feel like Zuckerberg managed to reach that point in real life. Basically unchecked by the rules of society he does whatever the fuck he wants to play a perverted meta-progression of life.

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Eager or desperate? They rebranded their entire company around a clusterfuck vr second life. Are they actually producing enough to stay relevant?

Facebook has been trending downhill for a long time. Threads I barely hear about. I don't hear as much about Oculus as I used to.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Facebook and shit don't matter much, but whatsapp is the primary form of communication for a good chunk of the world.

Fun fact: in some places, whatsapp and Facebook (and a few other sites) isn't even considered to be "internet". Like, if you don't pay an ISP you still get access to those. Then paying for "internet" gives you access to everything else.

[–] Gregers@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

Not that I ever wanted the perv glasses, but seeing this creepy ugly toad fucker wearing those makes me never want a frame remotely similar to them

[–] JollyG@lemmy.world 33 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

All these stories about VR, then metverse/crypto, then ai, and now gambling. It seems like Zuckerberg is trying to recreate the early success he had in an emerging field but, at a fundamental level, does not understand that facebook was successful largely due to luck and timing.

Sometimes I think America cannot be a good place to live until the myth of the "tech genius" is thoroughly broken.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 14 points 17 hours ago

does not understand that facebook was successful largely due to luck and timing.

That's every successful human. It's a known bias. The classic study was letting people play a rigged game of Monopoly. One random player gets double money among other advantages and wins of course. Afterwards the winner will always tell that it's because of their strategy or something like that, never they just got luckily.

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago

Tech genius is only the most recent wave in this fad. We love our hero worship, which results in cycles of this type of thing.

The most recent example is probably the Robber Baron era of the guided age. Some notables of the time include Andrew Carnegie, John Rockefeller, J. P. Morgan, Leland Stanford, etc. Edison and Bell didn't reach that level of wealth, but they probably would have if they were alive today.

Don't worry, a lot of that money is still around wrapped up in family trusts. Sure, they've given a decent chunk away to white wash their names but these weren't good people.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 16 hours ago

Anyone working for meta is a piece of shit.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 24 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Loot boxes and gatcha games:

[–] Elting@piefed.social 12 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Gabe Newell enters the chat.

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

tim sweeney tries to join the chat

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Mike Waltz has added Jeffery Goldberg, say hello 👋

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago
[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Zuck fucks up every business model he tries to the point of ending up trying to run some online gambling.

Worst businessman ever. "I'll just do an online Casino"

Failing at being a tech billionaire is pretty embarrassing.

[–] discocactus@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

Zuck had one good idea and it was literally stolen.

[–] areakode@riskeratspizza.com 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

He had one good idea to connect college student with one another, and suddenly he thinks ALL of his ideas are good. Fuck this douchebag.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 2 points 10 hours ago

facebook was originally meant for rating college chicks. Everything else was an accident.

[–] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago

I hate this guy

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 10 points 17 hours ago

Alternate headline: Lord of a crumbling, gutted empire struggles to maintain relevancy

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago

He's blown hundreds of billions on his VR and AI shit. He's desperate.

Meta plans to sell unused AI compute capacity, creating a new revenue stream: Report

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 4 points 14 hours ago

Well, since he bought Instagram, he did turn it from a social hub to a slot machine whose payout is fragments of connection to people you care about, carefully metered to be just enough to keep you coming back without leaving ad money on the table.

[–] HackThePlanet@lemmy.ml 7 points 17 hours ago

For those who may have forgotten, the little prince of Meta more or less started with Facemash, a site that displayed two photos side by side and asked users to vote for which person was "more attractive," using a mechanism similar to "Hot or Not."

All "funny" if it weren't for:

  • Privacy: using photographs of people without consent would often violate regulations and, in many countries, personal data protection laws.
  • Consent: the people depicted had not chosen to participate.
  • Objectification: asking people to rank solely based on their physical appearance can be seen as a form of objectification and can contribute to a disrespectful environment.
  • Possible psychological effects: this type of public comparison can affect self-esteem and exclude or humiliate some people.

Not to mention what happened with Cambridge Analytica.

What do people expect from a mind like that?

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

everything he sells is addiction

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

French style revolution is the only solution

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago

Meta also hopes to implement parts of Arena into Facebook and its messaging app, Messenger, attaching betting options to group chats, news feeds, and videos.

“We believe that prediction markets are one of the more interesting new content types,” Ime Archibong, a senior Meta official leading Arena’s development, reportedly said in an internal company post last month. “The social conversation is the payoff as people aim to show off how good they are at predicting things to their friends.”

The strategy appears to be: betting as content, gamifying gambling to become social. It’s a framing that could open the door to harmful situations, especially for the young people he’s going after. According to the National Council on Problem Gambling, 2.5 million US adults, or about 1 percent of Americans, meet the diagnostic mental health criteria of severe gambling addiction. An Epic Research study published on Friday analyzing electronic health records found that gambling disorder diagnoses have risen more than 60 percent since 2018 in states that have legalized sports betting. The largest increase came from young people, aged 18 to 29, whose rate more than doubled.

load more comments
view more: next ›