this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
230 points (98.7% liked)

News

38187 readers
2100 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ford executives said they have hired 350 veteran engineers — some of them were former employees, while others had been working at suppliers — after artificial intelligence and automated systems failed to deliver the desired quality level.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 60 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Wow, the clankers couldn't measure up to experienced engineers? Who could have possibly seen that coming? Why didn't someone warn someone about that?

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I love how you got down voted for telling the truth And For you adding a small amount of sarcasm into the comment. I’m thinking it’s a pro AI person.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 4 points 2 days ago

Some Tesla driving knuckle dragger with a MAGA hat that takes naps while their car drives on autopilot.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There's always an asshole downvote.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The best AI could come up with was plastic oil pans, which are all failing.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Plastic oil pans were a thing long before AI

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So were cam belts in oil. Ford has always been a shit company with second rate engineering. Thankfully they don't make sedans any more.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Yeah, it’s much better that they’re engineering only huge trucks and SUVs capable of flattening whole families when systems fail.

[–] scytale@piefed.zip 28 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Really shows how a lot of executives out there are just as dumb as any person, believing AI fully replaces humans.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

No, they are worse.

The lack the detail knowledge about what (current) AI is, are therefor under heavy influence of corporate salespeople and have the constant pressure of making more money.

[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

And are insulated from consequences because they occupy the privileged positions where when you massively fuck up everyone knows you’re still one of the good guys and you were really trying out there so you get to keep your job or you get a nice cushy pay package and some nice PR about parting ways

[–] lando55@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don't know if this one can be chalked up to straight stupidity. It's only ever about quarterly earnings.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

These execs are mostly Boomers who have no idea how AI works. They saw it as a party trick and were amazed, then assholes like Bill Gates are telling them AI will wipe our asses in three years. They had FOMO, like when they ran into the EV space to make those Tesla profit margins. Who cares, they rotate out in 5 years rich either way.

[–] scytale@piefed.zip 4 points 2 days ago

Yeah, so that’s two dumb things now: One, believing the hype that AI can fully replace a human worker, and two, that it will cheaper (tokenmaxxing go brr).

But they're paid according to the value they bring the company!

/s

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 45 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I hope those engineers managed to get a big raise, because Ford will try that again soon.

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They've said they're hiring them back specifically to train and help their automated model/systems

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

I hope they’re smart enough to poison them so jr engineers can get a foot in the door behind them.

[–] Ariselas@piefed.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm guessing "gray beard" also means they pulled engineers out of retirement or those close to retirement so that they can reduce the work force through attrition.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The plan is to have the grey beards train the people who will train the AI.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No where near enough data to train AI.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 1 day ago

It is for fine tuning an existing model.

[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 30 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Those engineers should have formed a union and refused until they could collectively negotiate their pay. I can't think of a more straightforward situation in which a union would be more appropriate.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Many Detroit engineers are in UAW.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I would be surprised if they weren’t part of the UAW. Many states are “At-Will” and don’t have exceptions for union protections.

[–] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

Michigan is an at-will state however there are still limits on what employers can do.

[–] BlindPenguin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Many states are “At-Will”

I love how even China has better worker protections than the "land of the free"...

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 1 points 17 hours ago

land of the "free to take it up the ass"

You're 100% free. Free of worker protections. Duh.

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The CBA with the union provides the protections. The bare minimum the state requires for everyone isn't all that relevant when you have a negotiated contract for much more than that bare minimum, whether it's for-cause termination protections, mandatory notice and severance pay for layoffs, etc.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

That’s what I was trying to say though, in states like mine between the at-will law and the right-to-work law there is basically no way for unions to include that in a contract in an enforceable way. Effectively even if your union contract included for cause termination protections you would have to both prove that you were terminated not for cause (which in my state can include things like “does not fit in with work culture“) and litigate that yourself assuming your employment contract or union contract doesn’t include some sort of binding arbitration agreement with your employer. And that’s putting aside that union membership in my state is incredibly low due to the right-to-work law.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago

Better yet, form a Contracting Firm, with all members as partners, and the Company can hire the firm, who will provide all services.

Pay the engineers at triple their original rate, and charge the company 6x, and save the excess. As cost overruns, and special services with higher costs, are factored in, the excess can be paid out to the partners as quarterly or end of the year bonuses. Maybe make the Company give each engineer a brand new top of the line vehicle of their choice, as well.

The company DESERVES to be abused, they EARNED it. Stick it to them ruthlessly.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And those engineers asked for triple pay, right? Right?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

And the executives that made the initial decision were fired right? Right?

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To be clear, this doesn’t mean Ford is abandoning its AI plans entirely. Instead, it’s using the rehired employees — referred to as “gray beard” engineers — to train younger staff and reprogram AI tools.

Sounds... Ominous.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So is the 2027 f350 full of vibe code and shoddy designs then?

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 3 points 2 days ago

It takes a few years for companies to admit this jind of stuff so I assume the 26 and 25 years were vibe code crappified too.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hmmm sounds like you have to just accept and invest in your training pool to ensure the long term health of your company. Once these guys are gone again, they won’t have anyone to turn to, to fix their mistakes.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Long term thinking? That's crazy talk! Line must go up now!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

The only way they would re-hiring ME is as a contractor. My rate would be at least 3 times my previous, hourly rate, I will set strict limits on my hours and you will pay me at the end of each day. In cash.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Heh, bet those engineers know exactly how much they matter to the company now. Nothing.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Or everything, which is why they asked for triple pay on rehire. I hope.

[–] Solrac@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

A company is nothing without it's workers, a simple mass strike would debilitate any company. Let alone a mass walkout, like these companies deserve

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh sure, but not gay beards? Fucking racists.

[–] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

Aren't beards already gay?

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago

Hey, I've seen this movie.

https://youtu.be/BStvRwNqd-Q

'Desk Set' with Tracey and Hepburn. Tracey is a computer expert trying to replace Hepburn's team of researchers.

load more comments
view more: next ›