this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
109 points (99.1% liked)

movies

3603 readers
222 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

Down Periscope. It is to this day the most accurate submarine movie of all time.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

"A Shot In The Dark".

[–] ecvanalog@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Josie and the Pussycats

[–] epicthundercat@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago
[–] Noyesster@piefed.social 9 points 14 hours ago
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

O Brother, Where Art Thou?

[–] Slovene85@sh.itjust.works 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 3 points 14 hours ago

My favorite movie.

I showed it to my mom, who worked in an office and she brought my copy in to lend to someone. I got it back around 3 months later when eventually everyone on her floor had seen it.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago

Young Frankenstein, and it was made in 1974.

[–] towamo7603@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Marx Brothers, Duck Soup.

[–] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

South Park: Bigger, Longer, & Uncut

[–] badhops@sh.itjust.works 68 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 80 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Monty Python and the Holy Grail

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] webkitten@piefed.social 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

Rewatching as an adult, this is a psychological thriller. Phoebe Cates is dangerously unhinged and hurts everyone close to her with her delusions. She sinks her friends houseboat and assaults a violin player at the mall. Then she passes her illness on to her new boyfriends daughter.

[–] mrsilkworm@piefed.social 46 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Idiocracy. started as a comedy, evolved through time in a documentary.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In Idiocracy, people take a crisis seriously, the state is actively looking for experts to solve the crisis, and defers to them quickly, and when evidence appears people change their minds. Finally they elect the person with the actual best plan for the future.

Idiocracy fundamentally has a wrong view of American stupidity. Idiocracy treats Americans as well-meaning but too complacent to care about the long-term consequences. It declares that society's problems are from a (genetic) lack of useful effort.

But, as the past 10 years have made increasingly hard to deny, American "stupid people" are actively hostile to reckoning with the long-term consequences of their actions. Ignorance was only ever an excuse. It's entitlement rather than complacency, and society's problems come from ('genetically smart') people deliberately bending useful effort towards societal harm for personal gain.

But while it may not have been quite as grating, Idiocracy was already wrong when it came out. Civil rights were suppressed with "ignorant" excuses that were a fig leaf on the desire to do harm. The eugenics the movie takes as a premise - that "smart people" breeding leads to a smart world and inversely for "stupid people" - is itself a form of "ignorance" about genetics that was actively being used as a fig leaf for genocide in the US in the century before.

But no, I'm sure you "just don't get" how Idiocracy is endorsing a genocidal view eugenics. It's easier to "believe" brawndo makes the plants grow.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] flabbergast@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)
  • Mars Attacks!
  • Galaxy Quest
[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 1 points 14 hours ago

:: yodeling intensifies::

[–] grue@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Blazing Saddles, especially since, as they say, you couldn't make it today. 'Course, now that's less because you can't say the n-word and more because all the anti-racism would trigger the MAGA CHUDs.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 5 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

I wish I could find it again, but years ago I saw a video about why you couldn't make Blazing Saddles today, aside from it already existing/permission/etc. It wasn't the racism or anything, or how people today are too sensitive.

It couldn't be made today because Blazing Saddles basically destroyed the entire genre.

Prior to its release, Westerns were everywhere. They were incredibly popular, with countless movies and TV shows released every year. Then this movie comes along, points out all of the overused tropes, and reveals the formula they've all been using. The genre of Westerns has never recovered. It would be lampooning obscure content with dated references that people don't understand.

That's the real reason it couldn't be made today.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

That's a reason it wouldn't be made today. Not "couldn't"

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 hours ago

The only reason it "couldn't" be made is that Mel Brooks won't license his work for a remake. Everything else is "wouldn't", including any concerns about people taking offense. There are entire studios dedicated to doing exactly that.

[–] tomenzgg@midwest.social 1 points 8 hours ago

It's not the actual main thesis of the video so I may be wrong but that sounds familiar to a portion of Lindsay Ellis's video on Mel Brooks: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62cPPSyoQkE (unfortunately, I don't have the spoons to try and rewatch the whole thing to double check, for sure).

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›