this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2026
661 points (94.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

48611 readers
1773 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I personally do, he actually risked his life to release information about the government spying on people. And there are for sure more advanced ways now. Even your phone is listening.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What Snowden did was objectively good, and he did so at great personal cost, but you should be cautious about making any living person your hero. His politics seem to lean closer to libertarian nut-job than anything else, and it's very possible he will disappoint you in the future. Case in point, Glen Greenwald broke the Snowden leaks, and I considered him one of my heros for a time,.but these days he sounds more like Tucker Carlson than anyone else. The point is, admire heroic actions, but don't make people your heroes.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

His politics seem to lean closer to libertarian nut-job than anything else

Sure, but you could say the same of Luigi Mangione and that isn't slowing anyone down.

Case in point, Glen Greenwald broke the Snowden leaks, and I considered him one of my heros for a time,.but these days he sounds more like Tucker Carlson than anyone else.

Glenn was always a libertarian crank. But after he got ousted from The Guardian, his economic needs superseded his politics. I might suggest that if Glenn had ended up on MSNBC rather than the gutter for FOX News washouts, he'd be denouncing Snowden today rather than praising him.

The point is, admire heroic actions, but don’t make people your heroes.

I don't think you can criticize Snowden because the guy who interviewed him ended up becoming a crank. But I also don't know of what became of Snowden, outside "he fled to Russia after Hong Kong wouldn't hide him".

I might suggest that Snowden was only able to leak what he did because he climbed up the ranks through Booze-Allen to begin with. And there you've got an inherent problem with whistleblowers - either coming or going, they must have done something you don't like.

But I'd say his turn of conscious and his work ethic and professionalism in how the information was aggregated, leaked, and confirmed makes him a role model for anyone else who aspires to turn coat against a fascist regime. Whatever you think of the individuals, you still do need Role Models in order to inform how you might achieve similar results. That means studying other people - studying history at the individualist level - and asking how they did what they did. Ideally, you're studying people you admire because you want to be more like them. Realistically, you're going to study people and see their warts. And that might shape what you think about their motivations and whether your own motivations lead you the same way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Garbagio@lemmy.zip 40 points 2 days ago (12 children)

It's hard to say he's a hero, but, what he did was undoubtedly heroic.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Ghis@lemmy.world 74 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Guy gave up his life to show Americans (and the world) the truth, and we as a society just ignored him.

ignored him.

No we hunted him and he had to hide in Russia.

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 21 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I'm starting to think the world isn't even worth saving, since this is how the world treats those that want to save it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 14 points 2 days ago

it’s not so much we ignored him as the government ran a huge smear campaign to discredit him

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

conservatives have a wierd obssesion of him being a"traitor" guess exposing conservative hypocrisy is traitorous.

[–] BNE@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago

That's because conservatives think they're not going to be treated like 'the plebs'. They think if they're loyal to the empire, they'll be exempt from the imperial boomerang when it comes back (it's here).

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 50 points 3 days ago (3 children)

He told the truth about the US spying on it's citizens. I got nothing respect for him.

[–] Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

No he provided evidence. There were people around the globe who knew about the nsa before Edward Snowden and told the truth. There were articles and videos back in 2008 about the nsa backdoor into windows. The only main difference is he, "proved it." like you know how someone goes, "yeah! well prove it!!!" He did.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Phantaloons@piefed.zip 38 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think about where we'd be without him, and I think about where we are.

Oddly enough, it's the same place.

[–] Bogus007@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago

It is not his fault. He raised it several times and proposed alternatives, but the flock continued to choose the same butcher.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 50 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Seeing how little we actually did, I often wonder if he regrets coming forward.

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 29 points 3 days ago

I don't think you remember https before. Snowden's revelations kicked off LetsEncrypt and the much broader deployment of https.

https://www.standwithsnowden.com/news/lets-encrypt-and-snowden.html

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 112 points 3 days ago (23 children)

I consider him a true American patriot.

Nothing is more patriotic than wanting your country to do better.

Implementing drag net surveillance was a terrible decision, and exposing it was truly heroic.

Sadly, Snowden is now in the clutches of Russia who can and does use him as their pawn.

It is easy to say that this is where the EU should have stepped up and given him sanctuary, but that would have been less than ideal for him.

  1. Europe and the US have close ties with police and law enforcement, while no EU nation would hand their own citizens over to the US, they would absolutely hand over a US citizen to the US if requested.
  2. During the war on terror, Europe was complicit in plenty of illegal renditions of their own citizens to the CIA, they were then sent to illegal black sites and tortured, plenty of these persons have since been proven innocent.

Given the high profile of Snowden's leak, the US still want's him back, and back then even more so, had Snowden gone to the EU, he most likely would have been extradited, kidnapped or even assassinated.

By staying in Russia that was a far lower risk to him.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

His demand to return to the US and give himself in was if he got a public (non military) trial.

The government's offer under Obama was that the only guarantee they would provide was that he wouldn't be subject to torture.

Even if he had negligible effect on state level surveillance, the documents he shared provided some insanely valuable perspective into the capability and power of nation states in the cybersecurity space.

Anything the NSA is or was doing can also be applied to other major countries like China or Russia, and the capability + compute power has only grown in size since.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowden_disclosures

EDIT: Also in true American foreign interest memery, the top two most heavily surveilled states are Iran and Pakistan.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago

The USA has stretched 'technically not torture' too far for that to be comforting.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 203 points 3 days ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 36 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yes, at minimum a martyr.

Watching his disclosure real time while everyone around me ignored it was something else

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kevinsky@feddit.nl 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I mean I have no idea what this guy's like, outside of what he's broadly known for, but I definately approve of what he did in regards of informing the greater public about the level of intrusion they are actively seeking to have into everybody's life.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

He did a good thing. Don't know enough about the man to pass judgement.

And after all, the guy that killed Hitler (undoubtedly a good thing) was very much an asshole.

[–] FatherPeanut@pawb.social 7 points 2 days ago

Bit of a nuanced take, a trimmed down copy-paste from another comment of mine prior. Tl;Dr: he's a product of the system that left the system.

Snowden was an individual that worked in the intelligence community in the mid-2000s. In this era, the American populace was so afraid of terrorism they signed away freedoms for national security. In this post 9/11 world, patriotism was a given, almost nationalistically, if you were American. It's fair to say that a highly nationalistic media and culture can influence the individual to embrace those mentalities more... even if it perverts your true best interest. Snowden likely viewed service to the NSA as patriotic, and in support of his fellow Americans. While he started off supporting it, he soon saw immorality, and decided to resist against them with what I see as an effective measure. I feel that for most whistleblowers, this logic applies. I wanna say "Good job, but still shame on you for taking the job to begin with," yet this system we're in can cause us to support things we otherwise wouldn't like.

Looking to modern issues: The manipulation of individuals, mass surveillance, leveraging of government by powerful. Critisizim of these was always there, but where it was pointed at and pursued sure felt a lot different after Snowden.

[–] HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub 48 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I think he is a very sad man. He thought americans cared, he thought if americans knew they were getting fucked over they would do something. He thought american democracy is worth fighting for.

He was wrong.

load more comments (5 replies)

Damn right he is. He risks his safety and his life (and still does) to make sure we all know more about how the feds are spying on their own citizens.

He's a true hero of the American People, that one, make no mistake.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 31 points 3 days ago

100% I do. Him and nicholas are the biggest black spot on the obama administration and I hope the things that bring him the most shame. They are part of a small group of heroes of the millenia. Snowden being in russia because he brought to light what the governement was doing is one of the biggest indicators of our dystopia.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 27 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yes, but...

He was a definite hero in releasing what he discovered. He blew the whistle on things that the government was doing that it had no right to do, and that people had a right to know about. He risked his life and freedom to do it, and is paying for that by having to live in exile in Russia.

The "but" is that at times he has speculated on things that he doesn't have any direct knowledge of.

For example, what he revealed in the PRISM leaks is that the US was tapping into submarine cables owned by companies like Google and getting the data that was going between various Google datacenters unencrypted.

That showed up in the PRISM leaks as this slide:

SSL added and removed here :-)

Snowden claimed that Google was cooperating with the NSA, when that slide shows what was really happening. The NSA learned how Google's architecture worked, found a vulnerability, and exploited it without Google's knowledge. Google reacted to the PRISM revelations by putting in a huge effort to encrypt data everywhere, in transit and at rest.

Until then they had thought that the data was safe. The places inside the Google network where the data was unencrypted were protected by significant physical security. They didn't think anybody could get in, at least not get in undetected. But, their threat model didn't include the US government treating them the way they'd treat an enemy country.

Google did "cooperate" with the US government, in that when it received a legal order for someone's data they complied with that legal order. They even set up systems to make that process seamless. Things like the FISA court were a bit of a joke, so it was really easy for the government to come up with a legal order that Google release the data. But, Google still did require that the government go through the motions of getting a court to sign off on the orders. I think that's why they were so surprised that the government didn't think that was enough and had tapped into their backbone traffic.

If you look at what actual full cooperation with the government looks like, look at the revelations of Mark Klein. He was also a heroic whistleblower. What he showed was that AT&T set aside a special room in one of their facilities where AT&T would copy all the Internet traffic hitting their network so that the NSA could sift through it as they wished. There was no need for a diagram of where AT&T added or removed encryption because AT&T was just handing it to them unencrypted.

So, yeah. He is a hero for what he did. But, he was irresponsible for mixing the things he knew for a fact with his own personal speculation on them, because some of his speculations were wrong.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 5 points 2 days ago

No, his behavior shall be average, not an exception. However we have to fight the repression that target him, like every other one that stand against repression

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 3 days ago

Everybody, who puts morals or ethics in front of their own, personal gain, is by default a hero in today’s context. That’s the only weapon we have against authoritarian regimes, capitalism and oligarchy. A weapon, that can only be used once per capita. But don’t be fooled—we are all.

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 60 points 3 days ago (27 children)

Yes. You're a bootlicker if you say otherwise

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] yenahmik@lemmy.world 75 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think he blew up his life to reveal something the general public probably should be aware of, but ultimately didn't care about.

Idk if it was heroic, but it certainly was interesting how he released the info slowly to get catch the government in numerous lies attempting to downplay the truth of the matter. One of the Obama administration's biggest blights.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 56 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yes, 100 percent. The fact that he's in exile in Russia is because he cannot get a fair trial in the US. He was never a Russian asset, he's a whistleblower being unfairly persecuted

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

There are a lot of comments here saying "it's tragic because no-one cared", but that is misleading as there is now a strong privacy movement.

I think, without Snowden blowing the whistle, anti-privacy laws would not face such stiff competition.

Yes we're all fighting a rearguard retreat, but without Snowden's sacrifice there would be no rearguard and there would be abject surrender rather than retreat, and we'd all live under eastern-style surveillance states without ever knowing.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] GarboDog@lemmy.world 48 points 3 days ago

Yes, he’s a hero And he shouldn’t be punished for calling out the he found. Hope he’s having a great day

[–] The_Blinding_Eyes@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

He could have been, but his actions and words since has made me feel he had ulterior motives from the start.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 30 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Finally we had a guy truthfully hollering that the sky was falling and, at the end of the day, no-one gave a shit.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I still like the fact that he released so many documents that when the newspaper tried to open the file it broke Excel, so he had to come in and fix it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›