this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
397 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

85567 readers
3333 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Defense contractor Leonardo is promoting a new technology called SignalTrace that will package plate cameras with sensors that can scrape unique identifiers tied to your smart devices and make that data available to law enforcement.

Police, border security, and other government agencies already comprise Leonardo’s customer base, and with this technology, those clients seek to correlate footage from these cameras to phones, tablets, wearables, AirTags, and, naturally, the electronics inside cars themselves.

If SignalTrace can pick up your Bluetooth headphones, you can be sure it’ll also be looking out for your vehicle’s 5G hotspot, infotainment system, and even its tire pressure monitoring sensors. The company includes pet microchips as a potential entry point to tracking.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What's the point of even having the 4th Amendment when corporations can completely sidestep it and tell the government exactly what you're doing all the time? Corporations and the government are essentially the same entity with this massive loophole.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

The constitution isn’t real anymore. It hasn’t been for a long time. Nothing is getting better until we have a revolution and constitutional convention

[–] LuminousLuddite@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

They want us to believe we're "free" and have "rights".

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Whenever a leftist talks about technofascism and technofeudalism, this is that.

Ignore them and let big brother watch you, citizen. Being adversarial to the safety that monitoring provides would be far too political for your centrist, apolotical heart. Just accept that this is the price of safety and work hard and have kids. Take the blue pill.

Or you can take the red pill, and free your mind.

[–] fishy@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

I am on nextdoor and at least once a week there's a post about Seattle's mayor turning off the flock cameras and it's inevitably flooded by Republicans screaming and shouting that she wants there to be more murder. These people have no critical thinking skills and just parrot anything whatever media station they chose says.

They always disappear when I point out the cameras have been hacked, Leo's nationwide can access, they've been caught stalking with the cameras, they can listen in on conversations through a cracked window, and we have no guarantees the data won't be fed to AI. Guess I can add precise location tracking through phones to the list too.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

~~hide your devices in a faraday cage~~ X

Drive around with a machine with 20k reprogrammable-MAC bluetooth radios that randomize the MAC address every 10 seconds ✓

[–] Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk 9 points 1 day ago

Or buy cloned devices from China which all have the same MAC

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Carmakazi@piefed.social 127 points 2 days ago (4 children)

How many criminals are taking along their microchipped pets to and from their crimes?

Rhetorical question I know. They simply do not want to allow dissidents and undesirables the freedom of movement.

Also, if you contribute to a project like this, you are a traitor and should be treated as such.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mrnngglry@sh.itjust.works 42 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is how you make tech enthusiasts hate tech.

[–] imperial_bouncer@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Or motivate them to tactically acquire new hardware.

The elites don't want you to know this but the cameras in the park are free, you can take them home.

[–] Snowwdropp@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

Strategically Transfer Equipment to Another Location

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I had heard previously that shining multiple laser pointers at a camera will break it. Just a thought.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Snowwdropp@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Does GDPR protect Europeans from this kind of boring surveillance dystopia?

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

IANAL but it does have a bunch of exceptions allowing governments to do whatever they want.

[–] razen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I love anal

[–] bingrazer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I Am Not A Lawyer

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 12 points 1 day ago

Enshittification of society itself

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 56 points 2 days ago

If they track all that other stuff then they are not 'license plate cameras'.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

We have to quit these corporate electronics.

[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 22 points 2 days ago

Soon? Oh boy do I have some bad news for this reporter

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

License plate cameras will soon discover rapid unscheduled disassembly

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mecen@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago

Mass surveillance by corporation

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'd be a shame if someone hid an ESP32 nearby randomly broadcasting previously detected MAC addresses.

[–] batmaniam@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Despite doing an awful lot with ESP32s, Home assistant, and a bunch of LoRa stuff, I know very little about BLE. Would it be possible for folks to voluntarily add their MAC to a data base on gitlab, and have a ESP32 program that:

  1. Spammed out whatever the max reasonable number of random entries from that database is
  2. Updated it every-time it was on a specified WiFi So that every time I drove by one of these, not only do I look like a spacehulk of TPS, headphones, cars and cellphones, but I'm specifically helping someone appear somewhere not their location as well?
[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Thinking in terms of database management systems I would think these systems collect enough unique info that they probably can use 'composite-keys' to sort through collected content. If thats the case then they can probably filter out all of those fake MAC addresses with relative ease, but I like where your head is at.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

... pet microchips are passive LF RFID tags, they have a readable range of maybe 15cm? Unless they've figured out some way to power them at distance (or they're sticking UHF tags in your dogs, which they arent) without frying the camera and giving everyone cancer, they're inert. What weird marketing hype.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 days ago

One of the reasons 80s tech is making a comeback.

[–] extremeboredom@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Maybe time to start creating devices that spam various Bluetooth MACs and just leave them around... Raise the noise floor a bit

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Nah, too easy to filter. Make them clone MACs they've seen, and simulate trips around the city.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fleem@piefed.zeromedia.vip 19 points 2 days ago (7 children)

ghost in the shell laughing man shit.

a couple years go by and they don't know how to track people regularly anymore.

so if we bypass these sensors and algorithms, we become invisible in plain sight

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Hootz@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Could one build a device that could overload these with fake data?

Or should we just use cordless angle grinders?

[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don't know anything about jamming these but I do know that DeWalt makes a pretty good cordless angle grinder

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Its funnier than that, jammers are not legal, but data poisioning is. Leave a device near by that just rotates through IDs of all the signal types you know its listening for and it protects everyone passing by because their UIDs get lost in the noise.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 day ago

Did we just initiate a kernel panic challenge?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›