All I am seeing here, is the insane yearly cost of recurring maintenance on an old wooden house...*shudders*
memes
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
Shutters
It's really not that bad except the paint job every 10-20 years which costs as much as a new car, but back in the day they had oil paint which didn't peel like latex does. Still, imo, worth it to live in an historic, unique, drag queen of a home.
I suppose if you can afford a house like this you can afford a really nice new car every so often. A really nice car. Because a full scraping, sanding, and repair plus 2-3 color paint can cost over $100,000.
Or ... you just develop a hobby of house painting...
You could start a small business just to paint and maintain your own estate.
As someone with an old wooden house, it's actually not bad. They're built so damn well that they just.. stay there.
The expensive part is if you need to do any renovations. Updating electrical, plumbing, and HVAC sucks.
The looks you get when you tell your contractor you want plaster, not drywall.
They had to find a guy who still knew how to do plaster walls when we redid our bathroom. He was well past retirement age.
We figured out how to install gas lines appropriately. Many "ghosts" were gas inhalation induced hallucinations.
And 'juvenile delinquency' stopped after they took lead out of gasoline.
It's amazing how much the violent crime rate went down with the removal of leaded gas.
I like to read science fiction from that time and look at the things the authors, some of them actual scientists, overlooked.
You didn't see anything!
The lights have always been this way.
If we go by the logic in some media where the ghosts are bound to the house/property, they probably don't want to be stuck somewhere that will eventually just dissolve in the rain.
I honestly don't understand the houses going up in my neighborhood - it's getting gentrified and what is being built is so ugly. Who is buying these ugly ass houses for 1.5 MILLION dollars? If that was my budget I'd build something beautiful with a big porch like this picture, but all the "luxury" homes are boxes with big garages in front. I look at them on Zillow and they aren't even pretty on the inside.
I work for a city that's an enclave for the mega-rich and is going through hyper-gentrification. People are buying 3 million dollar houses, tearing them down, and building 15 million-dollar houses.
It's the 1%ers being pushed out by the .01%ers. It's a whole different planet.
But the contractors still suck and cut every corner they can, so it really is the same anywhere you go.
100 years from now haunted house stories will be about boxes with big garages in front.
And they all look alike in some developments. One cheap house after another, all exactly alike. Crap materials, horrible construction. Seriously, who wants to live in that kind of neighborhood?
"My house is haunted."
"You live in a ranch in the suburbs built in 1983. What kind of white bread ghost stuck around that mess?"
Since this is the closest thing I've seen to an architecture discussion on Lemmy, can I sidetrack this conversation?
I really want to talk about how I simultaneously love the Obamas and hate a lot of their style choices. The Brutalism of his new presidential library is... Imposing and unwelcoming.
Look at it this way: Brutalist buildings are more “honest.”
All modern buildings are brutalist (reinforced concrete, bare materials) until their glass / metal / brick facades are put on.
The Obama library is the anti-trump building. It’s devoid of flamboyance, false adornment, unnecessary material, or flashy opulence. It is exactly what it wants to be. Imposing but unobtrusive on the skyline. It’s part of the scenery, without becoming the scenery.
Turn out haunting a house also cost some ghost buck and inflation makes haunting unaffordable.
I wonder if older houses seem more "hauntable" simply because they were built to facilitate air flow within them. Before air conditioning, homes had to be built to allow air to naturally circulate. Thought was placed into room, door, and window layouts to encourage air flow throughout the home, windows were designed to fully open, and transom windows allowed air flow even when doors were closed.
The point is that old homes were built to allow air flow. This means that there's more opportunity for doors to randomly close and other things to be disturbed by the wind. Older homes also weren't as sealed and insulated as well. They were designed assuming that some of the structure would get wet and then dry out. Older buildings were designed to undergo constant moisture cycling, while newer buildings try to seal out moisture all together. More dramatic changes in lumber moisture content means more creaks, groans, and other ghostly noises.
Simply because of how buildings science has evolved, it's possible that older homes just more readily produce "haunting" sounds than modern ones.
Haunted houses are old. There's no way McMansions will last long enough for ghosts to sprout.
Fucking ghosts better chip in paying for the upkeep, property taxes, and everything else. No one gets to haunt for free.
Say, isn't that the old Henderson place? I heard they never could find a buyer after what happened.
Oh wait, here comes a happy and naive young family from out of town.
Look at this place baby... So much room. I could totally see us living here the rest of our lives.
......GeT.....OuuuUuut.......
To bad we can't stay baby!
It's because it's now dead malls that are getting haunted. To know what's worth haunting today we'll need to wait about 30 to 50 years to see what sorts of architecture is considered spooky.
I have a relative with a haunted McMansion. They're rich, they bought a slot in a brand new subdivision, had the house built for them. We joke that it's on an Indian burial ground. Everyone's had some kind of experience there, voices in another room when you're there alone, electronics turn themselves on and off, they're spouse interacted with a demon child thing and it left marks, rooms losing electric like the power went out but other rooms on the same circuit breakers are fine, I've personally heard a bloodcurdling scream come from upstairs while I was housesitting for them...
That place is the reason I'm agnostic, and not fully atheist.
Or more likely inhaled a lot of black mold spores
they're spouse interacted with a demon child thing and it left marks
lmao
There’s nowhere close to the demand for artisanship anymore. Rich people display their wealth through expensive disposable items, not carefully made things.
That house looks like it's $3.2 million dollars.
The truth is autocad.
Curves and pillars are hard to represent architectures in computer software. What's easy is nice boxy boxes.
The real truth is cheapass construction goals. Straight lines and few details are easy enough for less skilled labor to complete and it is easier to hide imperfections when there are fewer details.
The real truth is cost. To be able to afford to have this built, would cost a lot more than it did back then. Cost of living has become so high and you have to pay construction workers a living wage.
The real truth is ghosts. Ghosts have gotten lazy and don't like haunting places with complicated floor plans.
If you think curves and pillars are hard to represent in software, you'll be aghast how hard they are to represent with hand drawings.
Your typical architect or engineer of the era would need a kit of dozens of French curves to achieve proper specs in the drawing.

I think auto cad's role in minimizing residential craftsmanship pales in comparison to pre-fab techniques, fewer craftspeople, high volume assemblies, necessity for faster builds, less old-growth timber availability, and a philosophical shift in the economics of home building that now lean more towards speed and mass production.
Huh? There are zero problems with any curve you can imagine. The issue is that each one is unique instead of mass produced. Most do not spend the $$$ on top.
Eureka, CA has a ton of houses like this. It was the west coast lumber capital for a while, making a lot of millionaires who wanted extravagant wood houses
OoOoOoOoO.... I can't leave... Do you know what type of interest loan I have? OoOoOo
Small houses can be scary, too! My living room when I moved in back in October (not a joke):

And there's so much more!
I’ve tried/succeeded kinda to make this house in The Sims before lol (DaisyMarie86 - I have lots of Victorians and I’m a good builder 😋) and I can tell you why! it’s really hard and REALLY expensive!