this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
338 points (97.7% liked)

Greentext

8491 readers
773 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] drolex@sopuli.xyz 220 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That guy's name?

33 KB JPG

[–] Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works 58 points 1 month ago (1 children)

His mother wasn't creative

[–] Penguin_1024@piefed.zip 45 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He was born in 1898. The idea of digitizing information didn't really exist, much less the jpeg standard. I'say his mother was very creative.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago

William James Sidis's mother, Sarah (Mandelbaum) Sidis, was a medical doctor who graduated from Boston University School of Medicine in 1897. Sarah and her family immigrated to the United States. in the late 1880s, escaping the pogroms in Russia. Sarah married psychiatrist and psychologist Boris Sidis in 1894.

Sounds like she lead a pretty interesting life as well.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think the closest thing back then was a fax, which could transmit monochromatic documents. Halftone (grayscale) fax was invented by Arthur Korn in 1902, enabling newspapers to send/receive photographs via telephone. That used mechanical parts, electronic ADCs were developed in the 1920s.

As for the newest word in the acronym: The word bit only appeared in 1946, the word bite (machine word) probably shortly after, spelled with a Y since 1956.

[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 month ago

He's Bobby Tables' great uncle.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 194 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He was a socialist and was arrested during a May day protest. He was tried and convicted of sedition. The media attention and the fact that America was in the middle of the Red Scare made sure that he didn't get a fair trial. His parents made a deal to have him serve the sentence suspended and also be confined to a sanatorium for a year. This really changed his world view and he became very distrustful of media attention and central authority. Before these events he wasn't really bothered by the attention and he liked having public intellectual discourse.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Smartest guy is socialist. Government happens and he becomes an anarchist. Ergo I am a very smart boy cause I skipped step 1 and 2.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not seeing "anarchist" anywhere

[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Probably not smart enough...

[–] AzuraTheSpellkissed@lemmy.blahaj.zone 80 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] entheo_a1@lemmy.dbzer0.com 99 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ah so he didn't just decide he didn't like public attention, he went to a socialist rally and went to prison for sedition as a result, THEN realised maybe he was better off out of the public eye, where his politics was less likely to kill him...

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also I’d bet going through college at such a young age wasn’t exactly conducive to decent mental health.

Dude was probably burned the fuck out at a very young age.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He was smart but emotionally he was a kid. He was prodigiously intelligent for his age but emotionally he was developing at the normal pace for a kid. He was an 11 old kid surrounded by 18 year olds and older. The university faculty even pushed back against him being admitted so young but his father pushed for it until they admitted him.

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago

Ah, that sucks to hear. I'm absolutely with the university on this. Not because he doesn't deserve a mental challenge, but because he deserves to be a silly kid.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I was basically shoved through graduation by the time I was 15. I had teachers and administators trying to graduate me when I was 13. I refused. I'm glad I did now. My reaction was that I wasn't ready to be responsible for bills and food. I should have been far more worried about dealing with other people. I can tell you first hand that 18-23 year olds don't appreciate having someone several years younger than them in their classes.

[–] mech@feddit.org 74 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

No reliable record exists of Sidis ever taking a standardized IQ test. The frequently cited claim that he scored between 250–300 on an IQ test stems from a single, uncorroborated account by psychologist Abraham Sperling in his 1946 (2 years after Sidis' death) book Psychology for the Millions.

The concept of IQ as measured by modern tests did not exist during Sidis's childhood

Wikipedia

[–] lime@feddit.nu 37 points 1 month ago (4 children)

i mean, iq is a normal distribution. it caps at 200. 160 represents the 99.996th percentile, and above that the error bars are so large that the result is uneless.

[–] mech@feddit.org 42 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's not capped, really. But the claimed 250 IQ would be 10 standard deviations from the mean, so he'd be the most intelligent person in a population of ~10^24 people.
~10^11 humans have ever lived on earth.

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The most likely explanation is that he was from outer space

[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Smells like von neumann

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

It's capped in practical terms by the highest score a test can be given. Unless getting a perfect just means you have another harder round.

[–] bort@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

so what you are saying is that it has a cap, which is based on the number of people he is compared against?

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No, but without people to compare against, there is a limit to how high the scale can stay accurate. This is different from it actually having a cap, though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Telemachus93@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Strictly speaking, a normal distribution doesn't cap, neither at 0 nor at 200. Maybe the scores achievable by standardized tests do, of course.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 7 points 1 month ago

they usually cap at 150. but yeah it's not a hard cap, it's an asymptotic curve. statistically the chance of getting 201 or higher is the same as getting -1 or lower.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I was going to mention the same thing. Even the "smartest man alive" would be in those useless upper bounds.

To explain that upper bounds issue to others, imagine being the top score on a leaderboard. Some of that's going to be random chance and other factors, even if most of the time you score in the top 1% of scores consistently.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yuppp, this smelled like bullshit from miles away. Thanks for corroborating!

[–] Summzashi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

IQ is pseudo science nonsense anyway.

[–] MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Show me a guy who just jacks off at home all day and I’ll show you a guy who’s not causing any trouble.

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Depends on whose home it is

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Diogenes has entered the chat

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Diogenes refused to stay at home.

[–] zedgeist@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Home is where the hog is

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Very dependent on what they’re jacking off to, unfortunately.

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

Your Carlin gets a Carlin:

Show me a tropical fruit, and I'll show you a cock sucker from Guatemala.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also obsessed with tranfer tickets, would chase them down in the street, wrote a whole book about collecting them and would bore the fuck out of anyone who would listen about them.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

"Autism didn't exist when I was a kid"

Them as a kid

[–] IDew@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He understood that money and fame don't really make you happy

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

While true, a severe lack of money can really make you unhappy.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 month ago

"Ambition" is often just a "bell curve meme" situation, lol.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i am in no way “smart” and all that but i have subjects i love to learn about. mostly philosophy and “thought about thought.”

one of the things that depresses me is how I kind of wish to be stranded on an island with unlimited free time to read and think. like if i were to die and end up in some sort of afterlife, i would miss most the lost time i had to simply learn stuff.

sometimes that spirals me. sigh.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why do you need an island for that? You can read and think wherever you are.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

i know. it’s a me problem. for sure.

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 4 points 1 month ago

Sidis deserves to be remembered. Not only was he smart, but he seemed like a genuinely good and reasonable person too. I also like that he took great interest in anthropology and languages. If I remember correctly, he even developed a couple of languages himself because he was fascinated by it.

[–] Fancy_Gecko@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

graduated CUM LAUDE in 1914 at 16.

load more comments
view more: next ›