Was there ever a MS Teams feature anyone actually liked? Seems like the whole product is based on loathing.
this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
351 points (96.8% liked)
Technology
86217 readers
2487 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Good to remember that the client for Teams isn't you - it's your IT department
No, it's upper management. I don't give a fuck what you're doing all day as long as it doesn't create security vulnerabilities in the environment
Lol, are you kidding? IT gets to experience the suck of using it, and of administrating it. For as bad as the front end of Microsoft stuff is, the back end is usually worse.
load more comments
(3 replies)
It’s for CSuite that doesn’t wanna pay for slack but sees teams bundled in office and says “good enough”
Well to be fair slack is quite expensive, and getting worse every year. Both in price and usability.
They recently cribbed the Catch Up feature directly from Slack. I’m a big fan of that. Come up with a good feature on their own? Nah.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
Microsoft says that this feature is basically a replacement for physical workplace check-in peripherals, it reduces the need to manually update your status
Considering how much I have to manually fix my regular teams status, I have doubts as to how effective this will be.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Hmm...
Image generated with Microsoft Copilot
Wow, and what an image…
Should give the teams logo a whip at this point
Users "may" hate?
Many also do not care, unfortunately.
Let's not get that Lemmy echo chamber vibe where a few dozen of us agree that millions of Windows users don't exist.
load more comments
(6 replies)
My company device already has so much surveillance on it that this won't make a meaningful difference to me.
However, given that they can't even get my activity status right, I don't see it going well. For example It sets me we idle even if I'm typing furiously in my editor, unless I go wave my mouse cursor in Teams for a few seconds. Other chat apps got this right decades ago.
It doesn't deliver messages or delivers them out of order. Unread status on messages doesn't work right. It crashes randomly. I could go on.
Fix the core functionality, Microsoft, instead of adding all kinds of big brother bullshit. I don't trust Teams to get anything right and neither should my manager.
Even better when you have multiple machines logged in.
I am simultaneously presenting in a call and magically away from my desk, soon to be while working remotely and sitting at a desk in the office.
Fucking idiots.
load more comments
(1 replies)
If it's a new Teams feature I'm going to hate it regardless of what it does. MS doesn't make software for human beings any more.
It will also introduce 50 new product breaking bugs
load more comments
(2 replies)
“Users may hate”
Sweety, we already hate everything MS. Take a wild guess…
load more comments
(5 replies)
I look forward to everyone being shown as located in the major city where our VPN is listed instead of where we actually are. That's how it works for browsers and other location based functionality now.
Even without VPN, IP-based location has always shown me in all sorts of random places, sometimes even in the opposite end of my country. Guess it's an ISP thing.
This is using your office network/wifi SSID to set your location status in Teams. It’s not sharing your location when you’re nothing the office.
Also, it’s opt-in.
it reduces the need to manually update your status, and it also enables co-workers to know that you're at work so that they can coordinate in-person meetings with you.
They're not even trying with these weak ass justifications anymore. Are either of these things an actual problem for anyone?
load more comments
(3 replies)
Basically, Microsoft Places and Teams have received workplace check-ins via Wi-Fi. The idea is that if an employee arrives at the office and connects to their enterprise network, their profile status indicator will show them as being present in the office.
Joke's on you. My work is so stingy, they don't offer WiFi to employees. Also, I've blocked location permissions in Teams, just in case.
God damn I hate this universe, why is technology a tool to create new shackles instead of breaking old ones
load more comments
(1 replies)
Location: at work.
Is it possible to hate Teams more?
We have teams. It sucks. They’re going to make us use it for phone calls soon.
The phone calls part is one of the better parts at least for me) for Teams. It has it's own number, works on all the devices, can forward, and works well. I don't want to carry a work phone, and don't want a desk phone in the office (even though we have ones that connect to Teams). If there is a better solution that's 'cheaper' all for it, but seems pretty sold.
load more comments
(6 replies)
Since teams is for connecting people remotely (office to office, office to other departments, etc) what sense does this make?
Being "in office" has nothing to do with my location.
Microsoft sucks so much.
Easier to control if your employee is actually at the office instead of working from home.
It's not like the pandemic proved most office jobs could actually be done remotely...
im sure there ar eother ways of tracking thier progress, like thier work/projects done on a deadline. its more or less a control issue.
wasnt it only yesterday that Gremlin Satya Nutella was telling employees they should not be tracking their staff?
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›