this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
400 points (98.8% liked)

politics

29966 readers
3373 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Last September, Ríhanna Kelver was standing outside the Crowbar & Grill in Laramie, Wyoming, preparing to start her bartending shift, when she noticed a group of men across the street. One of them was shouting in her direction, and Kelver heard several homophobic and transphobic slurs as he began approaching her. Moments later, according to court testimony and surveillance footage, the man shoved Kelver to the ground hard enough to injure her tailbone.

Kelver responded by drawing a pistol from her bag, chambering a round, and pointing the weapon at the man who had pushed her. She kept the safety on and never fired. The man and his companions retreated.

Today, Kelver, a 28-year-old trans woman, faces two felony charges—aggravated assault and possession of a deadly weapon with unlawful intent—which could carry up to 15 years in prison. The man who shoved Kelver and who allegedly initiated the confrontation, known only as “S. Durham,” has not been charged.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

This is why judges and the judicial system do not deserve the automatic and unconditional respect they demand.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml -1 points 4 hours ago

Even a generous read of this article fails to prove that Ríhanna's case was influenced by the fact she is trans. The article gives many anecdotes of minorities, and claims they are disproportionately negatively impacted in the courts, but 1/ doesn't provide the data to support that, and 2/ doesn't go into details on the judgement in this case (and the omission leads me to believe they probably aren't in Ríhanna's favor)

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 27 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I really think we need to revoke Wyoming status as a state. They don't have enough of a population to justify statehood.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

Let's just use George Carlin's advice, put up a fence and send all the like minded people there.

Extract the few good people to nicer places.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago

In America people don't vote, land votes

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 37 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

And this is why you don't want a "mental illness" check for owning a firearm. They would absolutely label all LGBTQ+ people "mentally ill" and bar them from owning a firearm. It's also why a national registry is how you allow criminals to keep their firearms and make a list of all LGBTQ+ people who would own firearms...that list should never exist.

An armed minority is harder to oppress.

[–] discocactus@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

And if you don't think they've already set the stage for the same maneuver with Democrats in general you're living under a rock. They don't want civil war two, they want another Rwanda.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Yep, disarming the populous is step one.

[–] _lilith@lemmy.world 51 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Let's say they get what they want and put her away for 15 years. That's right about the same amount of time as a manslaughter charge. They seem to be actively arguing for just shooting the aggressor since the charge is the same.

The lives of homophobes are worth less by the day.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 16 points 13 hours ago

The lives of homophobes are worth less by the day.

Good, the market is starting to realize the value of a homophobe's life: nothing.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 14 points 19 hours ago

The classic "rights for me, but not for thee."

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 28 points 21 hours ago

Friendly reminder that SCOTUS, in an opinion authored by none other than Neil Gorsuch, ruled that discrimination by sexual orientation or gender identity is inherently discrimination by sex. If a set of behaviors is allowed by a cisgender person, but their biological sex does not match their gender, you are discriminating by sex.

Likewise, if Alex's husband comes to the company Christmas party and that is only acceptable if Alex is short for Alexandra, a woman, your discrimination by sexual orientation is also discrimination by sex.

A surprisingly brilliant ruling that has yet to be Constitutionally Calvinballed.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 71 points 1 day ago (23 children)

So these dudes antagonize her, approach her, and push her down.

She pulls a gun and doesn't even shoot.

Alright I'm with it so far...

They run off...and call the cops?

And the cops arrest...her?

Drawing the weapon was clearly defensive. There's no "malicious intent" if you're in a marginalized group and carrying a legal weapon.

Had she not drawn her weapon she probably would been raped, or worse.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

She pulls a gun and doesn't even shoot.

Can't speak for other states, but in Connecticut you'd have more legal protection if you actually shot the aggressor. Here a gun should only leave it's holster if deadly force is the only way to protect yourself. If you can eliminate the threat by simply brandishing, you weren't in a position where self defense applies.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] homes@piefed.world 143 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (34 children)

Matthew Shepherd

October 12, 1998

Laramie, Wyoming

They tied him to a fence and beat him to death

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

I got to meet his mom once. Powerful woman and tireless fighter to ensure other parents don't have to experience what she did.

load more comments (33 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›