So the article doesn't provide a map, and this is the most effort i'm willing to do:
this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
127 points (97.7% liked)
Europe
11287 readers
770 users here now
News and information from Europe πͺπΊ
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons), archive:is,ph,today (their JS DDoS websites)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Always remember: Canada has very close sea borders to two EU member states - closer than the UK had.
(Okay, yeah, these are not EU areas,but...)
So Canada is far closer than we think.
Besides: Fully for it - it would solve a buttload of problems both for the EU as well as Canada, it would help to strengthen the EU against Russian influence, etc.
The only thing I see as a must to remove unanimous voting in the EU and replace it partially by majority voting AND population based voting when required. (There are fairly good models for that - country based voting for topics that touch national sovereignty, population based for more individual topics)
Additionally Iceland, Norway and of course Ukraine are good candidates. Moldavia, Albania, Bosnia, Northern Macedonia, Montenegro, Kosovo I see little issues with once they achieve the requirements Turkey could in theory achieve these, too, but to be honest, I do not see that happen in my lifetime as that would also include the solution of the Cyprus conflict AND a restoration of democracy in a post Erdogan era.
The UK? I would be happy to welcome them back, BUT not just like before. Before Brexit the UK had a bloody good deal. They had lots and lots of specialised rules and exceptions just for them (among other that brought us BSE, btw) and used very aggressive blocking tactics whenever they felt they should get another special solution. Not gonna happen again, folks. Next time you apply the same rules will apply for everyone.
If Canada joined, it would provide a wealth of raw materials for europe. Everything Europe may be lacking can be found in Canada, and they already have extensive mining operations, (and some of the worst companies in the world that operate mines in foreign countries.)
I don't even see the reason to fret over exact borders. Is Canada on the European continent? No. But in the age of global trade and trivial global travel, that matters very little. What matters more in ease of integration isn't distance but cultural and institutional factors.
Like it or not, Canada is a European settler-colonial country. Its population is overwhelmingly those of European descent, and its legal and cultural institutions grew directly out of European predecessors. I absolutely do not mean this to say that there should be any kind of racial or religious tests on countries joining the EU. But objectively, in terms of simple practical ease of integration into the block, Canada would be pretty easy. Consider, which would likely be a harder integration, Canada or Turkey? Despite the distance, I think Canada would be a lot easier to integrate than Turkey.
Morocco in the EU must be some kind of joke.
(Maybe an unpopular opinion)
I'd rather not. The EU has already experienced growing fatigue. The further away the member states are, the less they have in common and the harder it will be to agree on political topics.
People in Canada have little in common with europeans, compared to countries within the EU, which are much more alike to another. Canadians are politically, economically and stragegically much closer aligned with the US than with the EU. E.g. a Canadian does not need to care as much about the Russian threat as Poles or Fins do.
I'd love for Canada and the EU to become closer allies but I wouldn't want them as a (current day type) member. The same goes for Australia, New Zealand or Japan. I'd love them as allies but not as EU Members.
A new Type of EU Membership though, which would profit from the single market, the euro, etc. but does not have voting power on people that actually live in europe though, I'd like.
Thoughts and counter arguments welcome
What makes you feel Canada is closer to the US than Europe? Remember, Canada is a European settler-colonial state. Its population descends mostly from European colonists. Its institutions, culture, commercial and industrial practices, etc. all come directly from European predecessors. Canada is an offshoot of Europe. Is it the same? No, certainly not. But I would think culturally Canada is at least as similar to France or Britain as France or Britain are to Finland or Moldova. You have a point about the military threat of Russia. But then again, Canada and Russia are the countries with the two largest arctic coastlines.
We're in the 21st century, and on a planet that is rapidly warming. You need to start thinking of this perspective:
You need to imagine a future where this ocean is populated and as active as all the other planet's coastlines. Canada is closer to Russia than Spain or Portugal are. They don't face a land threat from Russia, but they do face a maritime threat. Now, admittedly, the worst Canada really has to fear from Russia is perhaps Russia trying to seize Arctic resources or shipping routes from Canada. They don't face the existential threat of direct invasion and subjugation like Finland. But then again, it's not like Iceland is facing a serious threat of Russian invasion either.
Personally, I can see little reason for allowing Iceland but not allowing Canada. Australia and New Zealand would be similarly easy to integrate from a cultural and institutional perspective, but there distance is a bigger factor. Canada is closer to Russia than some existing EU countries. That isn't the case for Australia. Canada might risk loosing access to Arctic resources in a war with Russia, but there's nothing comparable for Australia or NZ.
I'm not sure what your post is really about and what exactly a possible future you imagine has to do with an EU membership today.
Also the Russia Argument was just one example I gave. There's so much more to EU membership than just the Fear of a Russian threat. There's economic systems, socialism, geography, culture, standardized systems, city structure, etc. For all these, Canada aligns closer to the US than to the EU.
The european settlers, ex-colony argument also holds for the US. Should we then also consider the US as an EU Member?
You need to imagine a future where this ocean is populated and as active as all the other planet's coastlines.
That's more a perspective of the coming centuries then it is of the coming decades though. It's not like migration follows gradually and in line with each degree the temperature rises. Also in that scenario the temperature on the Pacific coast lines will likely rise much more then the temperature on the Atlantic coast lines because of the likely collapse of the AMOC (meaning the red line might even expand further south, perhaps making european migration away from the North Pole more likely then migration towards it).
Stubb watched too much ESC.
Alexander is tripping if he thinks Turkey can ever join while Cyprus is a member.
But overall I agree with his comments. He's a smart dude.
Opportunistic and slimy but sure Canada good addition, Turkey probably not
I think if Turkey ever reverts back to a secular democracy, you might change position on that. I think the 'they're Muslim' part is a smaller problem then you (or at least a lot of people) think, and the 'they're not democratic' part will keep them from joining anyway, regardless how anyone feels about it. Turkey really isn't as middle-east as the countries a bit more east.
I didn't even remember religiousness, the dictatorship needs some revolting
I can't imagine the EU letting a semi-democratic country in. It shouldn't happen according to the paper reality, but Hungary made sure it won't happen in the real reality either.
Technically none are democratic as capitalist countries but I digress
His public persona is very different from his private one, and his public agenda is also different from his private one.
As a Canadian, yes please! Using the Euros sounds great too if it means less conversion fees.
Youβd be surprised to learn how many EU countries never adopted the Euro despite promising they would. As far as I know every EU country except for Denmark made the pledge but many of them never followed through.
The only two countries that have/had real and unique opt-outs concerning the Euro are Denmark and formerly the UK. All other countries technically must eventually adopt the Euro in line with their EU membership.
The only other country actually not introducing the Euro despite meeting the economic criteria for a long time is Sweden. Their people said no in a referendum in 2003, so the government simply doesn't join the European Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM II), which you also must be a member of for two years prior to be allowed to adopt the Euro.
Sweden should just grow some balls and join the euro.
Since 2023, at least there were some polls showing a pro-Euro majority for the first time. Maybe the global turmoil will tip the scales. Especially since the Krona effectively already follows the monetary policy of the Euro quite closely, from what I've heard.
~~It does, in economics is said to be "pegged" to the euro.~~
So I wonder what's the point of keeping the krona (and I wonder the same for Denmark).
Just adopt the euro and make things simpler for companies, tourists, etc.!
Edit: I'm wrong, see below
DKK is pegged, SEK is not.
Oops! My bad. So another reason to switch to the euro!
So I wonder whatβs the point of keeping the krona (and I wonder the same for Denmark).
People and their traditions. For some, it might feel like losing a part of their identity. Our domestic far-right party of course also eyes with the return of the good old pre-Euro currency.
Just adopt the euro and make things simpler for companies
I once heard of a Swedish company that used Euros internally. So I looked it up and indeed, the Swedish Companies Registration Office specifically permits either SEK or EUR as accounting currencies for limited companies in Sweden. In such a case, using the Krona is almost merely cosmetic.
load more comments
(2 replies)
As a Canadian who cut his teeth on Monty Python, I think Finland is a country where I'd quite like to be.
Australia too, pretty please!
Like Canada we have strong historical ties to the EU, well, British colonial empire to our shame.
Especially if there was a multi-tier eu where there is a geographic part to it and a (financial) policy part. Australia could easily follow the same product safety / social security laws, and if they are willing to do so they should also have a say. Maybe a bit like Eurovision, you can participate in our politics as long as you don't ask us to travel all the way over there ;).
view more: next βΊ