this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2026
342 points (99.7% liked)

politics

29938 readers
2365 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The New Jersey Democrat laid out how the U.S. had allowed Iran to sell an estimated $10 billion worth of sanctioned oil to China and then promised to further alleviate sanctions in return for releasing highly enriched uranium and committing to limiting its enrichment capacity.

“And that was the exact deal that you guys vilified, that the president and you vilified President Obama for having,” Booker said. Of course, Donald Trump’s deal is even worse than Booker says, as it reportedly includes a $300 billion investment fund for Tehran, in the event that a deal is reached.

$10 Billion to $300 billion. ART OF THE DEAL!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Fascists don't like facts.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 18 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I've said it before but that's what Trump always does. He fucks up an existing situation (which may not be ideal in most cases, but then few things are), and after making everything worse for everyone, arrives at a so called deal that isn't even half as good as the original one was.

And then there's much rejoicing about how great he is.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago

Fucking middle-man for a president.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 12 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Somehow Marco Rubio is the smartest crayon in the box in the admin?!?!. The bar is low, so so so so incredibly low. It’s subterranean.

[–] themaninblack@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Marco Rubio has a contemptible level of cowardice.

This is a non sequitur/ad hominem, but here is the debate where Chris Christie, a fellow cunt, handed Rubio his arse.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=u9OZ8xHTX7c

Also remember that Chris Christie prepped Trump for his own debates.

These people should absolutely be imprisoned.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

Hard agree.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Like 15 years ago I had a couple of conservative morons who lived next door to me try to convince me how great Marco Rubio was and how he would be excellent as president. And I just looked at them like they were the dumbest people I'd ever met in my entire goddamn life.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago

$300B LOSER fund. Its for reparations.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

It's only "worse" from the imperial perspective that it helps the oppressed more.

It's completely normal and completely shameful that the so-called opposition uses this framing.

(Checks notes)... Corey Booker... Oh ok. Fuck that guy.

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

So it's better because the deal is the same as before but we both bombed them more then paid them more money? So... they are less oppressed now after 4 months of kinetics because of a bigger payout? Is that your argument?

I hope I'm misunderstanding you.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

There is no understanding technocrit.

[–] tacoplease@lemmy.world 40 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Democrats need to go for the jugular and proclaim that Trump and the GOP have LOST the war with Iran. They need to force the point that with all the military might of the USA, the GOP was so incompetent, they lost.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

Nah. Dems should push the point that imperialism is doomed. That the MIC needs to be deconstructed. That serving zionism is genocidal. Etc.

But they won't.

[–] discocactus@lemmy.world 15 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Idk sounds like too easy of a win, what about running an unpopular plutocrat? Maybe Pelosi?

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You want Dems to run to the right of Trump on Iran? 'Member when they tried that with the southern border?

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

The American right is all about pretending they didn't lose. Short list of examples in cronological order:

  • the civil war
  • the great depression.
  • the JFK / Nixon POTUS election
  • the vietnam war
  • the Afghanistan war
  • the Biden / Trump election

Of course the USA lost this thing with Iran. We didn't even state a clear goal and STILL wound up in a state where the absolute best we could hope to describe it is as a draw.

It isn't running to the right to describe things factually. Reality, after all, has a well known left-wing bias.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 hours ago

And the Dems have a sordid history of trying to outdo Reps on 'tough' foreign policy. The lesson from the current conflict shouldn't be: "Reps are too incompetent to win this war", it should be: "our entire policy towards Iran (and Israel) has been a counterproductive disaster".

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

This win/lose framework is childish and feeds into the imperialism that is the actual problem.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 79 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

So much gas-lighting going on from Trump's Whitehouse over the Iran war its ridiculous.

If Iran is still controlling the Strait of Hormuz to the point where they can use reopening it as a negotiation tool - then with all sincerity you haven't won shit.

Billions a week are being spent on a war that was completely unnecessary, leading to negotiations so bad they make the Obama administration look like masterminds for being half-competent at the job.

... And all this bullshit occurred just so Trump could distract from him being a paedophile - but if being treasonous cunt wasn't enough to get him in prison, I doubt being a pedo will do much either.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 hours ago

leading to negotiations so bad they make the Obama administration look like masterminds for being half-competent at the job.

Curious what issues you had with the JCPOA

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 7 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

But hey, at least the government is saving a few million on pennies

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

They saved gaza, didnt they? Nobody talking about it anymore?

Guys?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca -2 points 7 hours ago

The Dempublicans and the Republicrats...doing their mutual tango for their common overlords.

[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 60 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It’s “enhanced” by the Trump branding

[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 51 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

They're literally arguing this right now. For the Kennedy center, the judge deemed the placement of the name illegal, and it must be removed.

They argue the name cannot be removed because it will make the Kennedy center 'financially unreliable'

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 43 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Good, the whole fucken world needs to become financially unreliable right now. I am so sick of these vampires chasing the dragon when this entire fucking society thing is supposed to be about making life easier. Its driving me fucking insane.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 27 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 16 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I mean as in not human, sure. Billionaires stop being human after a certain amount of time with that kind of power

[–] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 2 hours ago

Well you also have corporations as non-human people, according to our illustrious top legal minds.

Granted, those "people" exist so that profits can be passed to the billionaires while liabilities are not

[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 5 points 22 hours ago

Word brother. It's time to take a torch to the whole stupid system.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 20 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The Kennedy center seemed to be doing just fine before the orange turd stuck his name on it

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Like the country. And the east wingbof the WH. And some casinos. And a university. And a family. And the air aound his orangeness.

[–] DataCrime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

$290B for licensing his name 10 billion to build five new hotels.

“Whoooooooos slushing my fuuuuuuundssss?”

[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 3 points 20 hours ago

☝️ This guy gets it!

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 14 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (3 children)

Yes all correct but I still haven’t forgotten that Corey Booker tried to block cheaper pharmaceutical drug imports from Canada on some bullshit about safety, and I still hope he falls into a pit of starving giant toe biter bugs.

[–] discocactus@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Really any pit would do. Let's not be greedy.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 15 hours ago

Don’t be silly, Canada is essentially a third world country. Why would we want drugs from there? Prolly filled with fentanyl. /s

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Last I checked Booker was also still voting as AIPAC wanted him to so his “quiet trouble” bullshit is exactly that: bullshit.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Who likes this guy? I mean really, does he have a legitimate constituency?

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 0 points 14 hours ago

Sshh they might hear you and ask why you want Trump to win.

[–] sns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

I think Marco used to be a bit taller when he had a bit of a spine.

[–] btsax@reddthat.com 6 points 18 hours ago

Before he started glazing trump he was an empty suit who did whatever Florida's sugar lobby wanted. He's never had anything

[–] protist@retrofed.com 4 points 18 hours ago

I don't recall that time

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 7 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

They both refer to Iran as an enemy, with no potential relationship beyond war or shitty deal.. Yet comfortably, the US is in good relations with other Middle Eastern nations, Israel, even China.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago

They both refer to Iran as an enemy

Imperialism has unquestionable bi-partisan support.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 3 points 13 hours ago

literally went to war with Vietnam, now a supposedly communist country and best buddies but need to destroy Cuba because communist country.

[–] Azal@pawb.social 2 points 14 hours ago

Do not forget this is the president who got chummy with North Korea last administration. Really can't be surprised after that.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

How dare Iran control their own resources for their own people's benefit?! 😡

[–] tinfoilhat@lemmy.ml 2 points 21 hours ago

If this is sarcasm, I upvote. If this is serious, I throw poopoo at you.

load more comments
view more: next ›