this post was submitted on 31 May 2026
201 points (100.0% liked)

HistoryArtifacts

887 readers
71 users here now

Just a community for everyone to share artifacts, reconstructions, or replicas for the historically-inclined to admire!

Generally, an artifact should be 100+ years old, but this is a flexible requirement if you find something rare and suitably linked to an era of history, not a strict rule. Anything over 100 is fair game regardless of rarity.

OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 33 points 6 days ago (2 children)

“You remember what a Polar Bear looks like, right?”

“Oh yeah, don’t worry about it.”

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago

I have a feeling, those who got close enough to see the details, didn't get a chance to sculpt.

In the artist's defense, they'd only just returned from an expo w/ some illuminated text scribes, so 💁🏽‍♂️

[–] solidsmoke@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Polar bear? Looks to me like they just carved some funny little guys. I'd hate for future archaeologists to find my highschool doodles and decide what animals I must have been depicting 🫪

[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Lotsa unicorns way back then. Hung.

edit: meant "hunh", but I'm leaving it.

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Unicorns just have the same horn down there. It’s all one diagonally placed bone all the way through.

[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

IIRC, horns are keratin and antlers are bone. ☝🏼

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Interesting. What else can you tell us about Unicorn physiology?

Pretty horny from top to bottom, and all the switches between. 💁🏽‍♀️

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 5 days ago

That "polar bear" has seen some shit.

[–] exaybachae@startrek.website 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yeah, sure, those totally look like polar bear faces and bodies....

Did the artist see any polar bears before carving this, or were they blind and working from verbal description?

Personally, I'm petty sure this is a normal example of 19th century porn.

[–] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 4 points 6 days ago

Mondays, amirite?

[–] KraeuterRoy@feddit.org 2 points 5 days ago

Looks like it was carved out of a potato - neat!