this post was submitted on 31 May 2026
400 points (90.7% liked)

Mildly Interesting

26702 readers
466 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gergolippai@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

i hate this, take my upvote.

[–] Aneb@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Anyone else see green and pink

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 6 points 1 day ago

This pic makes my brain go "AHHHHHHHHHHHHh"

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Human vision is an illusion. It’s mostly inferred, and not representative of how you think the world looks, and I think that’s pretty cool and profound.

[–] KillerWhale@orcas.enjoying.yachts 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Please explain how the world actually looks

[–] Sasquatch@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

I don't think there's an objective answer to that

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Historians are gonna really wonder why so many people talked about this

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I mean it is a legit philosophical argument. One of my mother's friends, whom I respect very much, told me she saw gold and white. So there is some merit to the conversation.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

whom I used to respect very much

FTFY

[–] updn@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

I shit you not. When I first saw it, my eyeballs were probably primed for daylight and I saw white and yellow. Ever subsequent time I saw black and blue. Reality is subjective.

I have always seen gold and white and still can't see black and blue.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

Definitely green needle

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 68 points 2 days ago (27 children)

Goddam! Thank you!
That kind of explains the gold or black dress!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_dress

I can for the life of me only see it as white and gold, and I have really struggled trying to understand how others can see it as blue and black? I bet the picture you show here is a result of the research the picture of the dress initiated. It can't be a coincidence that the illusion you posted also is made with dresses.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'll never understand how anyone can possibly see white and gold. You can literally see untinted yellow in the rest of the shop. If the dress was behind some heavy blue filter then how could the rest of the shop be such an overexposed yellow?

[–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Because the image is gold and a shade of blue that you can get from white if your white balance is bad enough.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago

But if the white balance was that far off, then the rest of the store wouldn't be that shade of yellow

[–] NessD@lemmy.world 56 points 2 days ago (5 children)

It's such a strange thing. For most of the illusions I can trick my brain to perceive both variants. This one is clearly black and blue. I can see that the black parts isolated can appear golden in the light, but for the life of me I can't see it any other than blue. Brains are weird.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I wonder how much of this depended on the differences in device screens. In 2015 there was a lot more variability in display technology, lower resolutions in general and worse color fidelity. OLED was uncommon and expensive, you probably only had an IPS display if you worked in graphic arts, and a lot of people were still using standard LCD monitors backlit with fluorescent tubes, which meant that the black depth was limited and the detail in dark regions of an image was frequently not visible on the screen.

[–] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

I remember showing a woman at work it, from my phone. She saw it as the opposite to me and another coworker. Me and the other coworker were stunned.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] imjustmsk@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

when I clicker the link I saw it as black and blue for a split second but all I see now is golden and white 😭😭😭😭

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (6 children)

The dress was revealed to be, in fact, blue and black.

[–] Murse@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 days ago

On 28 February 2015, Roman Originals announced that they would make a single white and gold dress for a Comic Relief charity auction.[31]

Oh man, MAJOR missed opportunity there! They sold out of the blue and black ones like overnight, they should have fast-tracked a white and gold version production to hit the shelves ASAP and enjoyed the flood of purchases.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] whosepoopisonmybuttocks@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Correct interpretation: blue and black in an overexposed image

Misinterpretation: yellow and gold in an underexposed image.

The area of the picture that isn't the dress is washed out in white and the overexposure is even bleeding over top right corner.

Anyone misinterpreting must either be bad with visual context or not understand photography.

[–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al 1 points 4 hours ago

Because obviously it's impossible to take a photo with an underexposed foreground object and overexposed background.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago

Oh come on, not this again

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 35 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I had to copy the image in Paint and select the colors to believe they were the same. Goddamned witchcraft, I say!

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Paint is compromised, they are in on it!

[–] NannerBanner@literature.cafe 4 points 2 days ago

The one that always gets me is the light/dark image that has the same grey in two places, and on one side it looks like darkness and on the other like light.

Basically, these: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=grey+illusion+light+dark&ia=images&iax=images

[–] stream_bone@piefed.blahaj.zone 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don't even understand the point of this. I see a black dress with a blue apron and a yellow dress with a white apron. Is that wrong?

[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Turn your phone horizontal (with locked orientation), now put one finger from your left hand and one finger from your right hand to the areas above outside the boxes.

Voilà! The boxed areas are the same.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ammonium@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (8 children)

The blue and the yellow are the same color (cover up the rest of the picture, there is no gradient in the bar). Same thing for the white and the blue, isn't that strange?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

This actually helped me.

[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

I don't get it. Are they suppose to look similar with the filters applied? I see both dresses underneath the filter, very clearly. On the left is the same black and blue dress with a yellow filter effect, on the right is a yellow and white dress with a very clear blue filter on top.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 13 points 2 days ago (6 children)

The point is that a black-and-blue dress, when brightly lit, will look eerily similar to a white-and-gold dress, when it's in shade.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, don't worry, you're supposed to be able to see they're different.

The majority of the image being grey is gives your brain the right context required to perceive each half is being tinted, so the perceived white balance isn't shifted around like in the original "the dress" meme.

This is more of a teardown of the "original" illusion than a demonstration.

Looking at the bridge, it becomes clear that even though you can see in the wider context that the dresses are separate colours - when compared directly under skewed/tinted white balance they become indistinguishable.

Meaning that in the original "the dress" meme, how you perceived the dress' colour depended greatly on how you perceived the tint/white balance in the surrounding areas of the photo (or how it was displayed on your device).

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (7 children)

I've seen the dress on multiple different types of screens and it has literally always looked blue and black.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›