New law, any acting president is not allowed to put his/her name on anything. If you want to be remembered, do the things that people will want to remember you for. Leave the decision on naming to future administrations.
this post was submitted on 29 May 2026
446 points (99.8% liked)
News
37784 readers
1908 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Vote in the primaries, vote in the general election. Get people in there who will actually do something.
the Inept moron probably did this just to waste tax payers money and more
It's not "wasted" if the money for parts and labor were being funneled into his accounts. Then, it's just more embezzlement
For anyone else wondering what the ruling was based on (other than trump being a narcissistic loser):
In a 94-page opinion, the judge said the Kennedy Center's board of trustees, made up of primarily Trump loyalists, violated the 1964 federal law that created the center, arguing the statute makes clear "the Kennedy Center must be named for, and is meant to honor, President Kennedy alone."
Oldest thing he violated
It's crazy that that needed including, but belated kudos to the lawyer who wrote that
honest question:
how tf do you write a 94 page opinon on a building?
You should try to read one! Skim it, I mean.
I haven't read this opinion specifically (and some of this probably won't apply), but generally:
They explain all of the relevant procedural stuff in detail, and even justifying how things are being handled, with citations. Then the basics about what happened, the arguments on each side. Discuss the relevant laws and relevant edge cases. They will talk about new submissions to the court, and basically tell the story of what happened legally (there was a hearing on x date, defense submitted new evidence on y date etc). Then they sort through all the bullshit as judges, saying what's accurate/a good argument and what's not. Then write their actual opinion. 100 pages is pretty standard from the ones I've seen.
Lots of citations. Lots.
Also, wide margins.
Definitely necessary with an administration that repeatedly uses loopholes and "creative interpretation" to get what it wants.
Lotsa legalese, I imagine
I like your confidence that they're actually "basing" decisions on anything but capitulation, but I appreciate the information
Yeah I see your point. What I mean is what do they say it's based on as their legal justification
It takes a really massive fucking loser to illegally rename a building after themselves.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/usa250/2026/03/19/gold-trump-coin-mint/89214207007/
The U.S. Department of the Treasury has taken a big step forward in a plan to etch President Donald Trump’s portrait on a 24-karat gold commemorative coin.
The Commission of Fine Arts, an advisory board whose members were handpicked by Trump, approved the general design on March 19 for a gold commemorative coin emblazoned with the president’s image.
Last week at the Trump National Doral Miami golf club, a group of religious leaders dedicated a twenty-two-foot golden statue to President Donald Trump, the resort’s owner.
There is just something not right about that man.
Obviously that's true. But there's something even more wrong with the people who worship that slime mold in a trenchcoat.
Its a 3-piece suit!
The tailor must have gone mad in the process. You could lasso the moon with those neckties.
Uh-oh -- don't they know that venerating statues will make them both evil and gay? 1 Romans:
^21^For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. ^22^Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools ^23^and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like a mortal human being and birds and animals and reptiles.
^24^Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. ^25^They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.
^26^Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. ^27^In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.
^28^Furthermore, just as they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, so God gave them over to a depraved mind, so that they do what ought not to be done. ^29^They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, ^30^slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; ^31^they have no understanding, no fidelity, no love, no mercy.
How much money did it cost the taxpayers to rebrand it with Trumps name and now to rebrand it, once again, with the original name?
Think about that waste
If he did it illegally, can he be sued somehow? Or, no matter what, it's all taxpayers money? An arch, a ballroom, his name everywhere, his face everywhere, gilt everywhere...holy shit...I only ever saw this happening on a badly written 87 minute comedy movie.
And then extrapolate all the other things the regime is doing that are illegal and unconstitutional and tying up the courts unnecessarily while normal people sit in jails waiting for their day in court. Waste of money. Waste of time (for people who are removed from normal life). It's a travesty.
I wonder why he's unpopular? Seems like a man of the people to me! /s
While I want good things for all people and generally do not wish harm on others, I do enjoy his base gradually turning against him and the public embarrassment of low Trump-phone sales and artists pulling out of the 250 anniversary show. And I admit that I kinda like that his boosters are getting hurt. I feel bad about it (I'd rather we all proper), but fuck you. You voted for it.
The Trump administration is, at best, a denial of service attack on every facet of the US. The amount of time and effort spent putting his name on there, and then slowly determining that it's not allowed to be there, and now removing it could likely have fed hundreds of people for months. He's doing the same thing all over the place, trying to put his name on airports, money, statues, etc. Death by 1000 cuts. And this is probably the least bad thing this administration is doing to the US.
It's the flood the zone with shit strategy from the likes of the Bannon the fascist.
The guillotine is too good for Bannon. Possibly a wood chipper, but ideally a small diameter one. It should be gradual.
load more comments
(1 replies)
charge an admittance fee to have citizens remove it. people would pay a bunch to be able to destroy anything with his name on it
The risk is that they will piss on it, which damages the stones.
You need to screen to the first few people or tell them explicitly not to do that and to rip it from the walls.
Then get the next people to piss on it once it's on the ground or trash.
Special bathroom with an entrance fee wouldn't be a bad idea.
Get out of my head.
I also have a bottle system worked out for the bastard's grave so I can avoid indecent expose charges.
load more comments
(12 replies)
people would pay a bunch to be able to destroy anything with his name on it
Chumps.
They don't tell you this, but you can destroy things with his name on it for free, anytime you want!
load more comments
(1 replies)
We shouldn’t have to feel so relieved that the law upheld, for now.
Oh he's going to fucking hate that.
The rageposting has already begun.
He doesn't care, this is one of things he did to distract from things he doesn't want us to pay attention to.
I hope they can scrape it off while he's still alive. I want to see him queen out over it.
I think the Kennedy name should be removed completely. Then it could be The Anticipatory Trump Memorial Center. And then once it happens, go right back to the Kennedy Memorial.
MOAR KETCHUP
"The Donald J Trump and The John F Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts"
- The Michael Scott Memorial Center for the Performing Arts
The Derek Zoolander Center for Kids Who Can't Read Good
view more: next ›