this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
113 points (100.0% liked)

Memes of Production

1596 readers
20 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@anarchist.nexus 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm pretty sure that Parenti hated anarchists ... but I would unironically rather read a book by someone who hates me than an unrepentant Epstein affiliate. (And also, Chomsky would also hate me because even with the most charitable reading, he's a turbolib wearing a skin suit sewn from the hide of an anarcho-syndicalist.)

[–] UnityDevice@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago

I would unironically rather read a book by someone who hates me than an unrepentant Epstein affiliate

Parenti has his own skeletons, like his staunch defense of Serbian genocidal fascists. Something he has in common with Chomsky.

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What's wrong with Manufacturing Consent ? I found it very insightful on how the US has been doing all kinds of shit that they keep accusing everyone else of. It's also helpful in recognising the same patterns in other media and other countries.

[–] MrNobody@quokk.au 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Chomsky is paid opposition, to deliver a softer message. He was also friend with Epstein.

[–] tangentism@beehaw.org 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

And Chomsky admitted that he didn't have much of a hand in writing it either

[–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

wait hang on, i thought we were discrediting the book

[–] tangentism@beehaw.org 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That fact doesn't exactly add any credibility to it and just underlines it was promoted over Parenti superior work by attaching the nonces best pals name to it

[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

nonce's*, pal's*🙇🏼‍♂️

[–] SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Genuine question, what is the evidence that he was paid opposition?

[–] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago

Chomsky is paid opposition

I would like to know too. Having bad takes and not the most radical analysis doesnt make one paid opposition. There is a reddit thread that discusses a longer article that tries to proof that exact statement and IMO fails doing exactly that.

[–] NightFantom@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They're not saying anything is wrong with it, just that there's even better stuff. Insert "look what they need to mimic a fraction of our power" meme.

[–] alapakala@quokk.au 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

real praxis is the direct acts we made along the way
cc @bestbouclettes@jlai.lu @Deceptichum@quokk.au

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Chomsky is/was Epstein's friend and in regular contact

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah I know about that, but I'm talking about the book itself and the ideas inside

[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 2 points 1 week ago

I'm sure they'll make up sooner or later

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago

Both books can be valuable.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 4 points 1 week ago

Porque no los dos?

[–] NightFantom@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Got links? I only knew those as communities on lemmy I see passing by on all, there's things to read?

[–] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Link to Inventing Reality by Parenti - Didnt read it, so dont know how useful it actually is. Maybe someone could post their key takeaways

Link to Manufacturing Consent by Herman and Chomsky - Didnt read it, but once watched a pretty animation on YT that hopefully explained the mechanism well. Be aware that Chomsky has been in contact with Epstein, as far as I am aware decades after the book got first published.

[–] alapakala@quokk.au 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

that’s the 1986 ed.. Anna already has the 2022ed..

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] alapakala@quokk.au 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

2s

took me longer manually writing out the exact file of Anna’s bulk🧲

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago
[–] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence

Really free of ML influence?

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@anarchist.nexus 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Meh. Just because a ML said it doesn't mean it's wrong. I.e., anarchists can still read Marxist or even ML literature as long as we read it critically, with care for the statist cognitive biases inherent in their foundations.

Also... the thought of Deceptichum in particular being is a secret ML is absolutely fucking hilarious 😆. Like nah, wrong user.

[–] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also… the thought of Deceptichum in particular being is a secret ML is absolutely fucking hilarious 😆. Like nah, wrong user.

Yeah not saying that. Just motivating people to read tankie literature in a community that claims to be not influenced by ML is worth pointing out to me.

Just because a ML said it doesn’t mean it’s wrong. I.e., anarchists can still read Marxist or even ML literature as long as we read it critically, with care for the statist cognitive biases inherent in their foundations.

Agree on the first part. Second part is IMO missing fron the meme.

Fair on both points 😀

[–] alapakala@quokk.au 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

pretty sure tankies in threadiverse have nothing to do with ML theory. I lean black simply because I am aware disabilities persist, and vanguarding is required until we are all reenabled. Until we are all empowered, none are.

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@anarchist.nexus 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

vanguarding is required until we are all reenabled

I mean I'm autistic and I don't need nor want a vanguard. Hierarchical power structures like vanguards are especially dangerous for people like me, because they provide a positive feedback mechanism for people already at the top of the power dynamic. And it kinda doesn't sit right to me that my existence as an autistic person, my disability, is why we "need" a vanguard party. Maybe I'm missing something?

[–] alapakala@quokk.au 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Disabilities≢disorders. Explain to me how can I empower people with paraplegia, comatose, dys/agraphia, dys/apraxia, amputation, aphasia, dysarthria, agnosia, etc..

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@anarchist.nexus 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Disabilities≢disorders.

Autism is absolutely a disability by any reasonable definition of disability. (ASAN is autistic-led, i.e. these are autistic people speaking about our lived experience.)

Explain to me how can I empower people with paraplegia, comatose, dys/agraphia, dys/apraxia, amputation, aphasia, dysarthria, agnosia, etc.

We would have to ask them (or for the comatose person, whomever is responsible for their safety) for what they need to be included in the community, and then act on it. In general, we can apply the same anarchist principles of freedom, horizontalness, non-domination, continuous consent, dignity, and inclusivity to our projects.

Like I'm not saying to never look out for anyone ever. Of course, we sometimes do need to stand up for people to defend them when they're down. I'm pushing back against vanguardism, the Leninist institutionalization of professional "revolution" that never seems to morph into communism as promised.

[–] alapakala@quokk.au 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

whomever is responsible for their medical decisions

that is a vanguard.

horizontalness, non-domination, continuous consent

Vanguardism.

Leninist institutionalization of professional “revolution” that never seems to morph into communism as promised

Nurses and doctors are institutionalized professionals vanguarding people to morph into better healthier versions of what you couldn't do alone.

If you have someone you can rely on, better yet, someone you use as support, you have a vanguard. Realizing how vanguarding is how we grow as mammals, is realizing some institutions are more corrupt than other hierarchical mammals.

I try to lean in empowerment and enabling you to do what you wish.
Not strip you off your desires, needs, and wishes.

[–] audrbox@beehaw.org 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The problem with vanguardism isn't that there are people who protect/stand up for others, it's that it inevitably institutionalizes those people into positions of power over those others. Nurses, caregivers, etc. aren't "supposed" to have power over their patients, but they very often do. Humans are already good at protecting and supporting each other--no need to risk creating a power differential by forming a designated vanguard to rigidify it.

[–] alapakala@quokk.au 1 points 1 week ago (10 children)

it inevitably institutionalizes those people into positions of power over those others.

Yep, are are still trying find a solution for this quandary

Nurses, caregivers, etc. aren’t “supposed” to have power over their patients, but they very often do.

Welcome to the mammalia Class. As a minor, did you consent to your caregivers’ care methods? Were you allowed to adult? Get educated?

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago (10 children)

pretty sure tankies in threadiverse have nothing to do with ML theory.

I disagree. Many share important ideological things such as democratic centralism and many use the same talking points offline MLs use to defend their favorite states. In practice they also always seem to fall back to ML approaches when asked about what to do.

[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure tankies in threadiverse haven't read any theory ml or otherwise

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Damn, I'm having an identity crisis. Am I a dogmatist who reads theory and blindly accepts everything I read, or do I not read theory at all 🤔

Do you actually have any reason for thinking that we don't read theory, btw, or is this just another case of, "They're bad anyway so it's fine to just make up whatever about them?"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

No they do read, especially crap such as Engels On Authority

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 1 points 1 week ago
load more comments
view more: next ›