this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
85 points (100.0% liked)

traingang

23012 readers
206 users here now

Post as many train pictures as possible.

All about urbanism and transportation, including freight transportation.

Home of train gang

:arm-L::train-shining::arm-R:

Talk about supply chain issues here!

List of cool books and videos about urbanism, transit, and other cool things

Titles must be informative. Please do not title your post "lmao" or use the tired "_____ challenge" format.

Archive links for reactionary sites, including the BBC.

LANDLORDS COWER IN FEAR OF MAOTRAIN

"that train pic is too powerful lmao" - u/Cadende

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 1 points 22 hours ago

Electric car ... go-bi-bicycle.

[–] regul@hexbear.net 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Better than a truck. I ain't mad at it.

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It costs 10-15k at that price they could have just built more chinese EVs and the driver would be 100x more comfortable when it's 100 degrees and humid outside

[–] regul@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This thing probably can't go above 25 mph and has a front that seems unlikely to injure even in the event of a collision. It also challenges the notion that everything has to be a car, which I think is valuable.

It's the size of a car so to me you're just describing a worse car

[–] EstraDoll@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

i don't care, i want one

[–] Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Plot twist: as heavy cars keeps getting in the way of Amazon's "cargo bikes", they end up getting America to finally stop prioritizing cars in their city planning for residential and commercial areas.

~~Then commerce starts to adapt and cities become slightly more walkable.~~

Then Americans start buying smaller vehicles to travel to/from their cars.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 13 points 2 days ago

I'm sorry, you think treatlerites are going to have a single thought to what their servants have to put up with?

[–] CarmineCatboy2@hexbear.net 2 points 2 days ago

Then Americans start buying smaller vehicles to travel to/from their cars.

from dust to dust. from car to car. the world, a lot of parkings.

[–] Athena5898@hexbear.net 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I kinda want one NGL. Don't have bike infrastructure here so you need something that might scratch a truck if they hit you. Get a lot of hate on the trike I have because its not as easy to bully as a regular bike.

[–] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago

Even some kind of e-bike tuktuk thing as a passenger vehicle would be dope af

[–] happybadger@hexbear.net 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

As long as they follow bike lane etiquette of the larger thing yielding to the smaller thing, I'd rather have these than full vans/trucks that park in the bike lanes anyway. At least locally there aren't many corporate biking incentives so there isn't much induced demand for biking infrastructure from businesses. Most small businesses hate it for taking up street parking. A lot of last-mile delivery with urban vans/trucks is a real cracking a walnut with a sledgehammer scenario, but they're paying road taxes on those vehicles that they disproportionately destroy the roads with so we get roads. With this we get street conversions as pedestrianised cargo bike corridors.

edit: It sucks this particular model costs like $10-15k though. A slightly smaller one at $5k would meet all of my urban driving needs and make a great microcamper.

[–] shath@hexbear.net 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

include pedals with a pedal-by-wire system

[–] Enjoyer_of_Games@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago

Next they will allow for remote pedalling by wire and we will have Fifteen Million Credits irl


ⓘ This user has been granted reprieve by death until completing unfinished business: making "a GOOD post, one for the angels!".

[–] Formerlyfarman@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago

This is actually very cool. The wheels seem too small for it to work in the real world. We tried building a similar concept a few years ago, smaller overall, with 3 bigger wheels, mostly to bring groceries from the town, didn't work very well, road quality was too poor and it got stuck a lot. Too heavy. had to sell it.

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But can it be turned into a technical?

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago

of course you can. in world war 1 italy had bicycle technicals

[–] volcel_olive_oil@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

is it a bike if it has a roof and four wheels?

[–] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Going by the 1968 vienna contract definition which is still in effect: yeah

"any vehicle which has at least two wheels and is propelled solely by the muscular energy of the persons on that vehicle, in particular by means of pedals or hand-cranks."

caveat for the electric motor that only supports you pedaling and up to speeds of X with Watts of Y and all but yeah, that's a bicycle.

I don't even think this is amazon skirting regulations, unless you up-end the entire system you can't really define a bicycle any better. There should be more bicycles like this.

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh come on you can't call something with 4 wheels a bicycle. Bi is in the name, this is just more bi erasure

[–] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago

the swiss have solved this issue by calling it a velo. we could also return to velocipéde. Not the bicycles fault everyone got that one wrong

yabba dabba doo

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago

If LaCroix made a bicycle