this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
127 points (85.5% liked)

Greentext

8283 readers
1205 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 90 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Does that disqualify someone? No.

Would I be interested? Also no.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For me it sure does. Fuck ass people insisting that it's not okay to disqualify people from your dating pool is stupid

[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 42 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Everybody's always saying you can deny a relationship with anyone for any reason until it's a reason they personally don't agree with.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

I mean, any reason for not wanting a relationship is a good reason because a relationship where one person doesn't even really want it is going to be a shit relationship.

That said, I might still judge you if your reasons are shitty.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Why would I care about someone else not dating someone. That's insane behaviour

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 week ago (39 children)

The idea that vaginas stretch out is kinda debunked.

Now assholes on the other hand...

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m not disagreeing with the point of your statement, but I do want to clarify that vaginas absolutely stretch, just not permanently. You’ll have a very different experience if you work up to fisting over a couple of hours vs. launching right into it, because vaginas loosen with arousal.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The important thing is that they are elastic - they don't stay stretched. They're not like sweaters that stay stretched out forever after someone large wears them, more like rubber bands that stretch temporarily before returning to their typical size. I think that's why OP used the term "stretch out," as too many people seem to think once a vagina stretches, it's a permanent change. It's such a weird misconception.

Giving birth stretches a vagina more than any penis (or fist) ever could. Though birth can make some changes that last, it's more like "Now I need a larger size menstrual cup" than "Now penises just slide back out," as the popular belief would have people believe.

[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah I was gonna mention the menstrual cup thing. The fact that they perceive the vagina as a purely receptive sleeve also suggests that they've rarely if ever had a woman orgasm on their dick. Hubs reports varying perceptibility between different episodes but that the muscular contraction is often robust.

load more comments (38 replies)
[–] strahlemann@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You could comment this on 90% of the posts in this community. Frankly, I like that far more than the “fake and gay” meme.

[–] rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Fake: Anon never visited Reddit

Gay: Anon thinks about 1000 men

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People just love to be offended by something a random stranger did 10'000 km away.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Logistically questionable, but if true than who gives a shit?

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (3 children)

According to Wikipedia it's true, and as a world record attempt a notary must have been present to count the men. There's another job I don't envy.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I don't get the point of notaries. Anyone could be a notary – you just have to pinky promise that you saw something happen under oath

[–] ChexMax@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah I mean you pay money and take a little course to become a notary and you have to reup every year (or three years? I can't remember). The point is you take on legal liability. A notary cannot claim, "i didn't realize, I didn't know, I didn't double check." Most of the money you pay is in liability insurance in case you screw up. Because if a notary stamps their name to something false, they bear the legal liability which is enough for a notary to not take the risk of flippantly stamping things that are untrue.

You can also legally marry people.

There are also legal limits to how much you can charge (like 10 bucks and document or something. It's not much). Since each stamp doesn't earn much, but the liability could cost you a lot, it keeps notaries pretty honest. It's a decent system.

Mostly only nerds are notaries anyway, so the promising and putting your name to something does some of the heavy lifting by itself

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] schnokobaer@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Did they count each guy's pumps? How many are required for it to count as intercourse

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PartyAt15thAndSummit@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

1000 in a single day? That's going to be difficult to...

🥁

... top.

[–] taygaloocat@leminal.space 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's still hard to gauge the stereotypical Lemmy user yet

[–] EtnaAtsume@lemmy.world 57 points 1 week ago (17 children)

Neurodivergent middle-aged Linux using anti-AI nostalgiagoggle-wearing very online privacy enthusiast with some degree of fixation on tech, be that privately (their hobby) or professionally (their job).

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago

Don't forget leftist but somehow not communist

[–] necrobius@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

Damn you didn't have to read me like that

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Depends on the instance:

  • LW/FHF users: Basically Redditors but mildly more elitist and significantly more male dominated
  • Feddit.de users: Like the previous one except german
  • DB0/FAF users: Nerdy, queer, and very leftist, also somewhat generally pro-ai (I may be biased here)
  • Blahaj users: Very lesbian, very trans, many catgirls, lots of Linux users :3
  • ML/Hex/etc users: Very leftist, very aggressive when approached with nonsense, gets into arguments with people whos minds will never be changed
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I would characterize us as more critically pro-ai, or maybe even just not-against-ai

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

i'm more concerned about how many guys were lining up

Maybe after the first 10 it should direct the queue into a room with a therapist to work out whatever problems they've got

[–] felbane@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"Hey buddy, we'll pay you $100 if you take an STD test and then raw dog this pornstar for eight seconds. You in?"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

you're an incentive if you care about bodycount

Maybe, but I do care about orders of magnitude in bodycount. Being in the low single digits myself I definitely prefer partners that do not have a bodycount three orders of magnitude higher.

[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

I definitely prefer partners that do not have a bodycount three orders of magnitude higher.

And didn't attain it in "one sitting," i.e one session just to have sex with 1000 people. I don't think i believe she even did that.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›