this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
72 points (84.6% liked)

Greentext

8230 readers
631 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 9 points 5 hours ago

People just love to be offended by something a random stranger did 10'000 km away.

[–] PartyAt15thAndSummit@lemmy.zip 11 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

1000 in a single day? That's going to be difficult to...

πŸ₯

... top.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 22 points 11 hours ago (9 children)

The idea that vaginas stretch out is kinda debunked.

Now assholes on the other hand...

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 19 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I’m not disagreeing with the point of your statement, but I do want to clarify that vaginas absolutely stretch, just not permanently. You’ll have a very different experience if you work up to fisting over a couple of hours vs. launching right into it, because vaginas loosen with arousal.

The important thing is that they are elastic - they don't stay stretched. They're not like sweaters that stay stretched out forever after someone large wears them, more like rubber bands that stretch temporarily before returning to their typical size. I think that's why OP used the term "stretch out," as too many people seem to think once a vagina stretches, it's a permanent change. It's such a weird misconception.

Giving birth stretches a vagina more than any penis (or fist) ever could. Though birth can make some changes that last, it's more like "Now I need a larger size menstrual cup" than "Now penises just slide back out," as the popular belief would have people believe.

[–] endless_nameless@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I don't think people caring about body count has anything to do with physical things other than drastically increased odds of STIs and certain cancers.

I think mature adults realize that sex is never just sex, it forms attachments whether you want it or not. Screwing around forming and cutting off attachments constantly kind of fucks with your capacity to emotionally invest in an actual relationship.

[–] fracture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago

i think the way you're describing the process as "screwing around, forming and cutting off attachments" really shows that you think of it in a very black and white sort of way. one can have casual / fwb sex with their friends, and still have a friend relationship with that person. one can even have one-off sex with an acquaintance or stranger, and even if you never meet again, it doesn't really make it a "cut off" relationship; if you met again, it would be pleasant, circumstances just may not arrange it

just because it's a more emotionally involved process for you or some people you've encountered, doesn't make it a universal truth

[–] poke@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Not everyone does form those attatchemnts. There are plenty of poeole out there who can just have sex and have a good time and move on.

[–] Tetragrade@leminal.space 1 points 3 hours ago

Good point, it also helps filter out people who are innately mental.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 58 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Does that disqualify someone? No.

Would I be interested? Also no.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 16 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

For me it sure does. Fuck ass people insisting that it's not okay to disqualify people from your dating pool is stupid

[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 21 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Everybody's always saying you can deny a relationship with anyone for any reason until it's a reason they personally don't agree with.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I mean, any reason for not wanting a relationship is a good reason because a relationship where one person doesn't even really want it is going to be a shit relationship.

That said, I might still judge you if your reasons are shitty.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Why would I care about someone else not dating someone. That's insane behaviour

[–] taygaloocat@leminal.space 16 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

It's still hard to gauge the stereotypical Lemmy user yet

Depends on the instance:

  • LW/FHF users: Basically Redditors but mildly more elitist and significantly more male dominated
  • Feddit.de users: Like the previous one except german
  • DB0/FAF users: Nerdy, queer, and very leftist, also generally pro-ai (I may be biased here)
  • Blahaj users: Very lesbian, very trans, many catgirls, lots of Linux users :3
  • ML/Hex/etc users: Very leftist, very aggressive when approached with nonsense, gets into arguments with people whos minds will never be changed
[–] EtnaAtsume@lemmy.world 40 points 12 hours ago (8 children)

Neurodivergent middle-aged Linux using anti-AI nostalgiagoggle-wearing very online privacy enthusiast with some degree of fixation on tech, be that privately (their hobby) or professionally (their job).

[–] CarstenBoll@feddit.dk 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Excuse me, but I am not neurodivergent! At least not to my knowledge.....

[–] Silic0n_Alph4@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Ok, we might have some news for you then…

[–] CarstenBoll@feddit.dk 2 points 1 hour ago

Are they good news? 😁

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 hours ago

Don't forget leftist but somehow not communist

[–] death_to_carrots@feddit.org 4 points 10 hours ago

Why am I in this post?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world 21 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Logistically questionable, but if true than who gives a shit?

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 30 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

According to Wikipedia it's true, and as a world record attempt a notary must have been present to count the men. There's another job I don't envy.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I don't get the point of notaries. Anyone could be a notary – you just have to pinky promise that you saw something happen under oath

[–] ChexMax@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Yeah I mean you pay money and take a little course to become a notary and you have to reup every year (or three years? I can't remember). The point is you take on legal liability. A notary cannot claim, "i didn't realize, I didn't know, I didn't double check." Most of the money you pay is in liability insurance in case you screw up. Because if a notary stamps their name to something false, they bear the legal liability which is enough for a notary to not take the risk of flippantly stamping things that are untrue.

You can also legally marry people.

There are also legal limits to how much you can charge (like 10 bucks and document or something. It's not much). Since each stamp doesn't earn much, but the liability could cost you a lot, it keeps notaries pretty honest. It's a decent system.

Mostly only nerds are notaries anyway, so the promising and putting your name to something does some of the heavy lifting by itself

[–] clif@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

You think that someone would break the sacred oath they took to become a notary? What is this world coming to...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] strahlemann@sh.itjust.works 24 points 15 hours ago

Anon is an incel

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 12 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

i'm more concerned about how many guys were lining up

Maybe after the first 10 it should direct the queue into a room with a therapist to work out whatever problems they've got

[–] felbane@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

"Hey buddy, we'll pay you $100 if you take an STD test and then raw dog this pornstar for eight seconds. You in?"

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί