this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
46 points (94.2% liked)

Fuck AI

7048 readers
2118 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sidefaceturdtalker@leminal.space 17 points 2 days ago (3 children)

So just let me hand over my autonomy over to the capitalist pdfiles so they can go and entrap sick low level players so we can maintain the perception of improvement. If we had better things to do we wouldn't be fucking around. L00ps, p00ps and dupes. Like we are committing a genocide but at least you captured the rapist pervert. Like a tooth pick in a volcano... marginal gains.. inconsequential metrics to put on a show for grandma. phuck your chat g!p!ty beach... I want trees, clean water and sheet. What a dumb a$$ future

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

“Low level pedophiles”? uh… fuck em all of every “level” as if the victims of “low level pedophiles” are less victimized or something? Pedophiles are like Nazis in the sense that every single one needs a boot on their throat, I don’t care what their rank is.

I have zero problem catfishing pedophiles and I think it’s bizarre anyone else would who’s bit hiding the fact they’re ok with pedophiles

[–] sidefaceturdtalker@leminal.space 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

ok reading comprehension bub... they selling you the idea of catching pervets while you give up you freedoms. This is a magga freezone. we criticaly think in hur. It is like "what if I promise we catch all the perverts but first we have to cut off your legs and you get no medical insurance." You all are nazis anyways... inoccent people die on death row and that was before chat gippity.

[–] november@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

the capitalist pdfiles

You can say the word pedophile here.

[–] sidefaceturdtalker@leminal.space 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah but it ended up being a useful shorthand I like "PDFile" cause it also blends in the main problem BIG TECH

[–] Leg@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This shorthand ruined my job for me. Can't open a .pdf without thinking about terrible things happening to children. I don't understand how everyone is just okay obsessing over this shit when all it gets you is angry.

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Because more people need to get more angry before anything happens.

[–] Leg@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Plenty of people are angry. Anger is not the thing we're lacking. I don't want to think about pedophiles while I work. They're gonna keep existing whether or not I get mad at em while I try to read a document.

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So, I want you to get up now. I want all of you to get up out of your chairs. I want you to get up right now and go to the window. Open it, and stick your head out, and yell:

“I’m as mad as hell, and I’m going to continue to take more because it’s distracting me at work.”

[–] Leg@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My man, I just don't want pedophiles needlessly occupying my attention. Shit doesn't even affect me. I have no kids. I know no kids. I'm just a grumpy old man shouting at clouds if I decide to be angry all fuckin day. You go be the change you wanna see in the world.

[–] sidefaceturdtalker@leminal.space 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it is not about you player. I hope you never forget you are dominated by a class of people who put their dirty dicks into children. That retirement will get snatched by ol gipity.... it is all connected. You are dominated old man

[–] Leg@sh.itjust.works 1 points 19 hours ago

What makes you different?

When the bread gets short thats when you will see change.

[–] MeowerMisfit817@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Habit's forces, we all were once at the pdfiles space.

[–] meowmeow@quokk.au 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you need sheets, and you don’t have them… I’ll buy you sheets.

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The state prosecutor in Vesoul said he faced charges of making sexual advances to a person of under 15 years of age, and of soliciting an image of a minor for pornographic purposes.

So, while I get that this man could be dangerous and needs help... How exactly can you charge someone with propositioning a 21 year old who was pretending to be a 14 year old?

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you asking about how the law would handle it, or morally, how would it be justified? 'Cause I can answer the second one really easily.

[–] jve@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Ok, how would you charge them, morally?

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If he believed the person was under 18 I don’t see the difference, he understood it was immoral and illegal, why it was illegal and chose to do it anyway. If it was an undercover cop posing as a child it would be just as illegal

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"I understood they were 21. The fact that they were an adult roleplaying as a child was understood by both parties, and it was obvious, given the wording they used. Roleplaying is quite common on dating apps. Roleplaying as a different age is so common it even has a name, age-play. When I messaged the other party, I thought I was pursuing an age-play dynamic with a consenting adult."

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 1 points 15 hours ago

Spotted the person rehearsing for his own court case.

Here's a little problem, however: the courts aren't stupid.