this post was submitted on 07 May 2026
273 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29911 readers
1839 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 56 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I would also like to borrow all $72 billion, if we're doing requests now.

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 15 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Only if you're not gonna use it to do socialisms 👍

[–] Steve@startrek.website 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Blackjack and hookers, pinky swear!

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago
[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I know you are joking, but what they use a lot of our borrowed future tax dollars for is in effect corporate socialism. Socialized losses, privatized gains.

Us workers are bag holders.

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But what a bag it is!! And made in the US of A!!!! Frack yeah!

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

Unfortunately the bag is made in China. Let's hope it's defective like everything else built over there by Wall Street that has pimped out or rather Enslaved the Chinese Workforce with the ascent of the supposed Communists with Chinese characteristics that force their Factory workers to work 12 hours a day 6 days a week. Yes I know they officially outlawed that but they still forced them to work it and just pay them less. China is a capitalistic fucking hellscape don't let anybody tell you otherwise. But I digress.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

do you want it to be ༼ ͡ʘ ͜ʖ ͡ʘ༽

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

i mean isn't everything a lil bit a perv thing if we're honest?

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Only if you want it to be 🙊

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

okay. if we're getting kinky, send me a photo of your roomba's bottom

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

i can't tell you how to work the kinks out of your roomba if you don't send me a photo of its bottom i can't stress this enough this is purely professional

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Thank you for playing along you've been a great sport. I really needed this today too.

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago

Aaaw :(

My pleasure :)

❤️

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No problem! Just seize control of the government.

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

He seized control of a 50-year old political machine designed to overthrow the republic, taking advantage of the alternate reality they crafted for their segments of the population.

We have nothing comparable in the opposition as of yet. The democrats, are controlled opposition They are not trying to defeat the Republicans' attempts to overthrow democracy such as it is.

We could win but we will not because we still trust the Democrats to run the opposition. Not me obviously.

[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 41 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Party of fiscal responsibility, my ass!!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah, but it's not being spent on actually helping America and move things forward; it's funding PEDOnald's jackbooted thug army and aggrandizing the shart of the deal guy.

Therefore, in summation, and QED, it's "fiscally responsible".

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

That's always been the thing for Republicans. They don't want to take on debt to help people, but if it's for the military or giving it to big businesses, that talking point suddenly doesn't appear.

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago

ICE?? Found another one!! Right here guys!!!!

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago

Every promise is a lie.

[–] joekar1990@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

It's exactly like the office scene you just have to declare something.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The Epstein class likes ass, and have arranged ours to be over a barrel.

[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 1 points 3 weeks ago

Don't forget without consent! It's not Epstein Class if we/they consent!

[–] SailorFuzz@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

This reckless spending is intentional, likely promoted by Thiel. He wants to kill the United States, so that he and his fellow ghouls can feast upon the rotting remains.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean yeah, the USA is insolvent already.

Of course any additional spending would need to be on credit.

Unless I'm somehow misreading that part of the headline

i did that :: width=50%

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

It's more so that whenever anything is made to help Americans, Republicans demand for a plan to pay for it. This shit though? Not needed, for some reason.

[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Meanwhile NASA's budget is an issue for some reason.

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago

They need to stop whining and pull themselves up by the bootstraps, okay!!? Maybe less cappuccino? 😤

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

There's a danger that it might be useful to people who aren't rich.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Because nothing matters, and what if it did.

[–] fira@lemmy.today 8 points 3 weeks ago

Fuck ICE & the pedophile dick-tater

ah yes, "fiscal responsibility"

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The party of fiscal reaponsibility, everyone!

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Silly child.

Fiscal responsibility only matters when a democrat is in office.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And I don't know how people keep eating this up.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago

The people who do are fucking idiots, that's how.

[–] ShortCIrcuits@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And im so sure itll be paid back too.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago

They're counting on enslaving us to pay for it

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

He’s not good for it - and when someone’s not trustworthy they have to put up collateral

Put up or shut all the fuck the way up

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I call his spleen

Always wanted a spleen

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

More economic sabotage. They must not have confidence that they'll be in charge when the bill starts coming due.

[–] ViceroTempus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

So anybody down for a 4th of July BBQ? I hear your nearest Republican is hosting.

load more comments
view more: next ›