this post was submitted on 07 May 2026
938 points (97.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

11493 readers
205 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 140 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

I hope he's remembered for losing a bad faith argument in the most ironic way possible.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 117 points 6 days ago (4 children)

i hope he's not remembered at all, like his cause (someday)

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So we're doing the "doomed to repeat it" thing again in like 80 years, got it

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 27 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Remembering Hitler and the abhorrent shit nazis did has not prevented nazism from rising again. If we want to be really pessimistic we're doomed either way.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

I swear to god, it’s like The Game. I go months without thinking about Charlie Kirk and when it happens I feel like I’ve lost.

Sorry, by the way.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mac@mander.xyz 4 points 5 days ago

You hope who isn't remembered

[–] U7826391786239@piefed.zip 29 points 6 days ago (3 children)

“I think it’s worth it. It’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God given rights. That’s a prudent deal. It is rational,”

[–] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo 8 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I don't really want to watch the video of him talking again, or of a human dying, but is that actually what he was saying when his neck just did that?

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 31 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

No. His last words were insinuating that mass shooters were mostly gang violence.

[–] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo 9 points 6 days ago

Fair enough. The irony would be too thick, if it were so.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Paraphrased:

Guy at mic: How many mass shootings were perpetrated by trans people?

Charlie: too many! (Crowd cheers)

Guy at mic: and how many mass shootings in general were there?

Charlie: Counting or not counting gang violence? (Gets shot, dies)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 56 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Spent his life arguing against the public good. Ended his life as a fountain.

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 40 points 5 days ago (5 children)

but people failed to realize that mediocre white men should be able to live a happy and fulfilling lives, too. like all of us should. they used to be able to do that by doing less skilled labour like manufacturing etc, and still be able to afford a home and decent life. that's until capital possessing elites decided that it is more profitable to use cheap off shore labour. that as well as worsening inequality left them miserable and without purpose.

too bad centrist politicians are mostly being bought out by capital, that's why opportunist grifters like Charlie Kirk was able to fill the vacuum that was left, and poison the mind of these people.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago

This is why, if you are going to caucus with Democrats, its important to insist on universalism in whatever social programs get focused on for a platform. Democrats look towards their technocrats to support 'means testing' as a way to split hairs and preserve capitalist ideals while offering soft changes on social programs. The result is that we end up with historically racists and sexist programs (look into the origination and implementation of social security).

The answer is straightforwards. Raise the floor. Programs need to be universal, period. There is no cost savings in piecemeal solutions or means testing; its an intentional way to sabotage the social project.

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 6 points 5 days ago

No one is talking to mediocre white men about their worries and dreams.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 5 points 5 days ago

Someone paid him.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 39 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Not that I disagree with the message, but why is most of it highlighted?

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 61 points 6 days ago (4 children)
[–] TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Needs more JPEG and arrows. I’m not quite following.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 days ago

You got me there

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkerRadical@lemmy.world 31 points 5 days ago (3 children)

His death was hilarious and I'm glad it happened

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 33 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I have a hard time celebrating anyone's death (there are a few I'm looking forward too though), but it's hard to classify Kirk's as undeserved. Hell, he preemptively justified his own death in that golden quote about "some shooting deaths are necessary in order to uphold the 2nd amendment".

[–] gurty@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I personally don’t think people should be shot for things they say. I think watching an old, decrepit Kirk fade into obscurity would be a lot more satisfying.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

The problem with that is the decades he would continue to sow discourse and spread hate.

[–] 666dollarfootlong@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

On one hand I agree, there could have been worse outcomes for him that he would have deserved, but on the other hand it is good that he can no longer cause any more harm himself

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Sidhean@piefed.social 4 points 5 days ago

Every time I do it makes me laugh, How did his shirt get so red, And what the hell is up with Charlie's head?

[–] bilb@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 days ago

Counting or not counting gang violence?

[–] nagaram@startrek.website 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

As a mediocre white guy who dropped out of college

Fuck that guy

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I also am a mediocre white guy who dropped out of college. And to top it off, I entered a field dominated by women. Am I DEI?

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago

No you're just qualified

[–] postcapitalism@lemmy.today 17 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

You, me, others. It's us. We are Charlie Kirk.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 7 points 5 days ago

Je suis Charlie.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

A white man who leaned left.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 21 points 6 days ago

When he couldn't get into West Point he was too much of a baby to just join up.

If he couldn't get the prettiest costume he wasn't going to play soldier.

[–] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 7 points 5 days ago

Why are we still talking about this guy?

He was murdered, he's dead, he's no longer an issue. We have LIVING people who STILL support the same shit he did.

He got the public execution he advocated for

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

To be fair there are a lot of very successful college and more than you might imagine high school drop outs. The difference between them and Kirk is that they're still alive.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago

Yeah but they didn't get involved in gang violence like he did.

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Who was Charlie Kirk again?

[–] III@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

I tried looking him up and all the results are for someone named Erika Kirk. I think they might be someone who transitioned. Good for her.

Some kind of breakfast cereal I think.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Charlie Kirk was the human equivalent of an unfixed tomcat that hangs out in the street and yells at everyone, harasses other cats trying to go about their lives, and spreads disease and discord until they get hit by a car or someone euthanizes them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

It's objectively the truth, I agree entirely with all of it.

I've got notes on how to adapt this identical message in a way to maximally influence mediocre white men, but It's pretty clearly not for that purpose. It could be, though.

load more comments
view more: next ›