this post was submitted on 03 May 2026
691 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

84352 readers
5326 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 20 points 8 hours ago

if they are so concerned about children, how about doing something about the mormon church and the fucking horrible crimes that are committed against women and children in it?

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

The Mormon Government of Putin representatives working for your freedom. The UTah Oblast is becoming a miniature version of CCP run China.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 28 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

More ways to control our lives and track our movements.

"Party of small government".

Personally, I would stop using any site that did this. We all know nothing matters in this country but money. Companies stop making as much, they'll get legislation changed.

[–] jali67@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 hours ago

They may have been at one point but they def stopped once Thiel and other big technocrats got involved

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 7 points 13 hours ago

We need debit cards that aren’t tethered to banking institutions which are bound to enforce this shit on their apps/websites.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 43 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

But spoofing a phone number and harassing me all day isn't worth solutioning. This Gov. is not representing us.

[–] LuminousLuddite@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

The Biden admin was about to regulate data brokers but then Trump happened.

[–] Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org 9 points 9 hours ago

They're always "about to" but never seem to do it.

If one "side" fixed anything they would not only lose the backing of their corporate sponsors, they wouldn't be able to point to the problem anymore and say they'll fix it to round up some votes before promptly going back to ignoring or supporting what they campaigned on stopping.

[–] Xella@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

Yet another Biden failure! When will that guy stop causing all our problems?! Thanks Biden! /s

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 16 points 14 hours ago

It seems like it's just a matter of time until the US has it's own red firewall.

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Every website would be better served to come up with a way to block all IP ranges that come out of Utah ISPs. Better to just block the whole state than try to play this game.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 19 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Have they thought about passing a law that checks to see if the people making the law have an IQ above 50?

This is the dumbest, most waste of time bullshit particularly when the rest of the country is imploding. Maybe they should focus on things that matter.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

Maybe they should focus on things that matter.

That requires effort. Something Republicans are incapable of doing unless it involves consolidating control over other's lives.

[–] 52fighters@sopuli.xyz 57 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

If I were a lawyer arguing against the law in court, my primary argument would be that this violates the interstate commerce section of the US Constitution.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 8 points 16 hours ago

looks at the scotus playbook

yeah that falls in between 'nuhh uh' and 'don't care'.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago

only problem is, it's gonna get upheld 6-3

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 12 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (6 children)

The acceleration of the popularization of darknets continues, it's going to be a tough decade, but at the end of it, we'll all be more private and secure. Learn about Tor, I2P, and anonymous internet alternatives!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] 10thGlyphix@lemmy.zip 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] SpongyAneurysm@feddit.org 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Drop an m and this still holds up.

[–] quack@lemmy.zip 27 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (11 children)

So how do they plan on figuring out if any given user behind a VPN is in Utah?

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

We can just add a few thousand tor nodes too. Not sure how they will ever enforce this.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Wait, how long until literally any software business realizes what this is, and hard lobbies against it?

You basically must conduct all your business unencrypted in the state of Utah if this is to be understood.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

Only business that would require an ID/Age Verification check, but yeah. Except they don't want to hold actual websites liable. They want to hold ISP's liable.

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 43 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (5 children)

The stupidity of these lawmakers is beyond wild. How the fuck is this real?

I have a similar idea, let's prosecute the police when they fail to catch criminals and punish them instead. A killer got away? Death penalty for the police officer in charge. That will make the killers think twice!

Or even better, let's prosecute politicians when their laws backfire and do more damage than good.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Rivermoonwolf@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Can we just trade Utah to, I dunno, Mexico for three bucks and a half eaten burrito?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago

mexico rejects offer, counteroffers three pesos and half eaten burro

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 17 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Russia's VPN crackdown disrupts banks, marketplaces and government services

And so if I'm in Utah as a traveller I can't check my local news by vpn? Ok

[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 19 points 22 hours ago

lol Mormons have the NSA servers in Utah.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 22 hours ago (10 children)

From my point of view, all I want is that Europe doesn't follow the US into suiciding it's own future in Tech by structurally dismounting the workings of the Internet for the purpose of autoritarian surveillance.

Mind you, given the seeming high amounts of corruption and kompromat for European politicians - especially EU ones - I fear that even here they might send us down the path of Technological Black Age to satisfy whatever large American Tech Companies that pay them or populist American or Israeli politicians holding kompromat on them.

[–] Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org 0 points 8 hours ago

Too late, they're all in on the derp, as well.

I mean how many times is Chat Control going to come up? It's their own KOSA, some "protect the children" lie by a bunch of Epstein Class pedos who want to track and profile everything about everyone.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 20 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (11 children)

Wait a second... how can they enforce this legislation when a VPN is masking the user's location? How do they know the user is from Utah?

Correct me if I'm wrong here, but aren't the users they're trying to regulate the exact subsection of users that they don't have the ability to identify as being citizens of Utah?

Like if a user appears to be in Utah, then they're probably not using a vpn. And if the user appears to be from out of state, then they could be using a vpn, but also Utah law doesn't apply to those people (because they're out of state)... So essentially this law can't actually apply to anyone...

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›