Linux

Nano, because it's the only one I can remember how to quit from without power cycling the computer.

I typically use nano for the quicker edits but enjoy using vim otherwise.

I use emacs

I use nano because I haven't learned how to use anything else yet.

Vim, but I also find this battle completely stupid.

Emacs.

With all the vimmery going around nowadays though, I feel like I'm on the losing team. ;_;

sed forever

Just echo text to create a new file or use sed and awk to edit an existing file.

In reality, I use nano for edits and vimdiff for comparing files (usually a .pacnew after an update on a headless device)

At the risk of restarting the Editor wars (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Editor_war) from days of yore, I find it interesting that emacs wasn't even in your list of contenders. I hear it mentioned less frequently these days, so perhaps it's going by the wayside?

For the record, I'm a vi/vim user! I had the privilege of being taught to use it by an RFC-writing greybeard decades ago, and have used it without thinking ever since.

For those who find themselves on a machine with only vi/vim, or want to learn, here's a quick primer when editing a file (usually done by typing "vi foo.txt" in a shell) --

:q! ...Force quit vi (:q also works -- gentler!)

:wq! ...Save file and quit vi

i (then type characters) ...insert text at current position

A (then type characters) ...Insert at end of current line

G ...go to first character of last line in the file

/foo ...search for first occurrence of "foo" in the file (hit / again to find additional instances)

x ...Delete character under cursor

:56 ...Go to line 56

yy ...Copy the line the cursor is currently on into the buffer

p ... Paste the buffer

r (then type character) ...Replace character under cursor

u ...undo (hit multiple times to undo prior actions)

When done with a command like this, hit Esc to go back into normal mode.

Second nature after a bit of practice! I used to work with a guy who insisted on using ed. That was... odd.

I still use nano, I tried micro and it's confusing af to use also it didn't allow konsole context menu to copy anything from it or paste anything from outside even with ctrl+v or ctrl+shift+v

I'm an emacs -nw kind of guy.

But if I have to pick one of your options, nano

"Why are we running from the police, Dad?"

"Because they use vim, son. We use Emacs".

I'm on team "whatever comes pre-installed"

Helix

Team Vim. Because I learned the vim basics once 20 years ago and never bothered to learn after that. :D

Nano. It's easy and I've never had a reason to change.

nano. I can't memorize esoterica.

vim

@SocialistVibes01 Emacs of course

Helix when I can install things, vi when I can't.

If we're talking purely something basic to be able to edit some shit on the system i think i would choose nano, purely because i've used it for years to edit everything (yes, even config files in full programming languages lol) and thus i'm very familiar with it. If we're talking anything terminal-based in general, i like helix as a modal editor. I chose it over neovim at the time because i didn't feel like configuring the whole thing, and helix is pretty much ready to go with lsp and everything ootb. A few weeks ago though i decided to make the switch to emacs, since i use guix now, so it felt like a natural fit. I might check out emacs in the terminal at some point, but i'm sticking with the gui for now.

Neovim. One time I accidentally opened nano and couldn't figure out how to get out of it... Wtf is with those keybinds?

Lol at emacs not even being on your list. Suck it, emacs users 😂😂❤️

Nano and I've actually started using Helix which I like a lot. It's keybinds make more sense to me than vim.

I realized that I'd forgotten about pico and joe, the latter was my very first text editor (hated it!).

nano for quick things; emacs for longer typing sessions.