The source for this is literally just her own word btw, and she hasn't even deleted any of her accounts with that kind of content on so this seems entirely made up

Edit: reddit thread talking about this being bs that you can find just by googling it https://old.reddit.com/r/VtuberDrama/comments/1t0g5zi/the_mimi_yanagi_situation_is_a_blatant_grift/

[–] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

A Reddit link was detected in your comment. Here are links to the same location on alternative frontends that protect your privacy.

[–] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

My 13 "thousand" janet-wink year old shape-shifting mystic sprites all-my-apes-gone

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I love CHUD infighting.

[–] PosadistInevitablity@hexbear.net 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Online conservatives dying on the hill of pedophile art is one of the weirdest consequences of 4chans existence.

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And it’s so funny how all of them are pearl-clutching prudes.

Everyone thinks I’m a sick pervert because…I don’t know, I play Skyrim and not Barney meets Jesus….so everyone calls for KOSA and shit, but somehow it’s good and Christian to goon to that shit? So do you want your religion enforced by the state or not?

[–] la_tasalana_intissari_mata@hexbear.net 19 points 1 day ago

"noooo my ethically sourced recreational use CSAM!!!"

[–] larrikin99@hexbear.net 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

reading the Coroners And Justice act 2009, apparently they lump together actual CSAM, porn drawn of real children or real csam, and fictional porn drawings with the same offense and the same penalty? (it says "indecent photographs" are handled by a different statute, but I'm don't think indecent includes csam). I support all of them being illegal, but it's obvious they should be punished differently.

[–] Blakey@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago

Putting them under the same statute doesn't mean they aren't punished differently tbf.

[–] regul@hexbear.net 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

all vtubers should be in jail

[–] asdasd201@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 day ago

Except Study Juche

[–] hellinkilla@hexbear.net 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

is there existing UK jurisprudence about when anime cross the line to being adult?

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I can't source it for you but I believe the requirement is that the work's primary purpose is for titillation. So for example there can scenes that pretty significantly cross the line into sexual territory but if that scene is part of a wider story that does not serve that as the primary purpose then it doesn't constitute porn. There are real sex scenes in movies with actors that do real sex acts but they're not considered porn.

[–] asdasd201@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 day ago

Why are you angry over Epstein files again?

[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 13 points 1 day ago

wow, two cakes

[+] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] Blakey@hexbear.net 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Firstly - pedos and pedo apologists are not welcome here. Secondly - it has been shown quite conclusively that when people seek this crap out, it normalises real CSAM and they are more likely to go out and directly harm children.

But the thing is, people don't seek out violent material to jack off to. Violent material that is produced for the purposes of arousal probably should be banned because that's something else we don't want to normalise.

[–] BeanisBrain@hexbear.net 5 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Secondly - it has been shown quite conclusively that when people seek this crap out, it normalises real CSAM and they are more likely to go out and directly harm children.

Any resources for further reading on this? It'd be good to have in my back pocket.

[+] Keld@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] Lenins_Dumbbell@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yes? How tf is this even a question?

Anyone that disagrees with this should be fucking put away from society. Thinking this is okay is not normal behaviour

[–] BeanisBrain@hexbear.net 10 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm not sure that taking people who have who have SV fantasies and locking them away in prisons/asylums, where they will be at drastically increased risk of SV, is a good way to combat SV.

Also these fantasies are super-common, so you'd have to lock up a significant proportion of the entire population.

Also also you'd have to lock them up for their entire lives, because "curing" someone of a kink is not psychiatrically possible.

[–] Lenins_Dumbbell@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

If you have SV fantasies, then you should seek therapy, Not SA pornography.

Are you trolling or something? I genuinely can't wrap my head around someone saying SA pornography is okay. Pornography in itself is horrible because of how exploitative the industry is, but SA porn specifically is one of the worst things conceived.

I truly mean this with no ill intention, but if you have such fantasies, please seek therapy, not porn.

As for the porn, I sure as fuck will try my best to get it banned exactly like CP. Both of these are horrible things that normalise some of the worst things humans are capable of

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 1 points 6 hours ago

I think you genuinely believe that you're being a good person by believing what you've said here, but I think you're making the mistake of imagining that women are sexless kinkless creatures that need protecting from the fantasies of men. I think that it comes from a somewhat patriarchal place of overprotecting women.

Literally an entire half of women have an SA kink.

Women are kinky, women are sexual beings. Half of women don't need to be sent to therapy.

Prudishness about sexuality and kink is an over correction that comes from a place of genuine belief in protecting women, but has itself not considered what women think and want either.

I am however on the same page as you when it comes to pornography, but that an outright ban is the wrong approach compared to simply winding down the financial incentives that exist. If you cut the ability for this industry to make money, this industry will reduce down to hobbiests that do it sincerely for fun because of their exhibitionist kinks which will be rather small.

[–] BeanisBrain@hexbear.net 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Pornography in itself is horrible because of how exploitative the industry is

This is an extremely narrow definition of pornography that completely excludes drawn or written material, much of which is produced by individual creators without any intention of making a profit.

I truly mean this with no ill intention, but if you have such fantasies, please seek therapy, not porn.

It is not psychiatrically possible to "cure" someone of a kink. Even if it were, the standard for a psychological trait requiring psychiatric care is that it negatively impacts the person or those around them. Most people who have this kink are not going to meet either standard.

You might argue that "it negatively impacts them even if they don't think so," but you are not in any position to make such an assessment about them and it's frankly condescending to insist to someone "no no, you're definitely damaged, you just don't know it." I know people who have this kink. They aren't time bombs and they aren't victims. They're people who happen to enjoy an extreme scenario within the bounds of fantasy. You're making a snap judgment you're completely unqualified to make about people you know nothing about. I'd urge you to read the literature about the psychology of SV fantasies before you weigh in on the subject. No investigation, no right to speak.