this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
123 points (97.7% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

45845 readers
1072 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 6 points 13 hours ago

16 speeding tickets in a year is fucking insane. I think in many states you would have enough points to lose your license.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 27 points 1 day ago

Just take their fucking license away, jesus

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Start with that one cop in that city that drives a pickup and has gotten hundreds of tickets. Then we’ll talk.

[–] nullify3112@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

Ok but how are they going to deal with the fact that LEO in their personal civilian cars are the ones speeding and going through red lights with impunity?

[–] OozingPositron@feddit.cl 50 points 1 day ago (2 children)

More than 16 tickets in a year should get your licence revoked, what the hell are you guys doing up there?

[–] bcgm3@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

Lot of capital to be extracted by issuing tickets, not so much by revoking licenses

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's a cop there that has racked up something like 560 tickets in the last 4 or 5 years. I just watched a YouTube video about it a few days ago. Some news channel was reviewing the most ticketed license plates in the city and discovered it.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago

Not sure if I remember wrong but I thought massive chunk were in fact police.

[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

We have a points system here in the UK, first offence you'll typically be offered re-education if it's only minor. After that, if you don't contest a minor offence it's a £100 fine, plus costs, plus 3 points on your license per offence. If you contest it and lose, or it's such a major offence that you get taken straight to court, you'll be fined a percentage of your weekly income (depending on how bad it was), court costs and surcharges, and extra points. 12 points in three years is called "totting-up" and you automatically get your license revoked, so as an absolute maximum you can get away with four speeding tickets in three years. Any more than that, and you lose your license. Or if you're a new driver, if you get 6 points in the first two years you have to start over with taking your driving tests again.

All this to say... someone getting 16 speeding tickets and not having their license taken away is baffling to me.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Every state is different - while I’m not sure how mine handles multiple speeding tickets, ask me how I know that 30 mph over counts as a major accident on your insurance. At that point, the cost of the ticket is almost irrelevant (approaching a toll both on a highway, when I passed the new speed sign I hadn’t yet slowed enough, the assholes. If they looked at my speed like 50’ later…).

Anyhow I have to expect it’s more “good old boy” corruption, where at each step he gets dismissed or charge reduced

Edit: oh, speed camera infractions. I believe those can’t be criminal since you have the right to face your accuser.

[–] mech@feddit.org 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Drivers who get more than 16 speeding tickets in a year should get a restraining order where they can't come closer than 500 feet to any car.

[–] plz1@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lol, exile form NYC, love it.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Got 16 speeding tickets? Instant banishment to Lancaster. Good luck speeding on a horse and buggy.

[–] plz1@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's funny, I read a separate article on Lemmy earlier this week about the worst traffic offender in NYC actually being a NYPD cop...

[–] notabot@piefed.social 64 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's fine, so long as the limit is set to 0MPH. Anyone getting that many speeding tickets shouldn't be driving.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

There's a points based system here and you would definitely be in suspended license stage at 16 tickets in a year. It's a crazy amount.

[–] violentfart@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why not an exponentially growing fine? A $10 ticket (honest mistake) doubled 16 times makes it $650k

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Honestly it should be a % of your yearly income. I remember a dude in Europe got a million euro fine or some shit

[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Great, first offense is 1%, doubles each time time. For the 16th ticket offemce it would be 65,536%.

Clearly that's impossible for one person to pay off, so every ticket after 5 gets crowd funded by all the people involved in not revoking the license after 5 offences.

To be generous, every 5 years with no new ticket, one offence is removed from the percentage count.

Drunk/impaired driving starts at 5% and quadruples each time, and never goes away. If you get a ticket for drinking and driving at 20, and then again 72, that's 20%.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Note that these speed camera "tickets" are different than normal tickets. No cop is pulling them over and issuing a citation to the driver directly. It's the car that is cited, and usually the registered owner ends up having to pay the fine. But since they can't prove who is driving it, they can't issue the same type of conventional ticket. (And that's also why the fine is so low -- make it much higher and people will flood the courts trying to get out of it by saying they weren't driving it at the time).

And that's why they can't just suspend someone's license instead. Because they can't tell who is driving in the picture, and even if someone gets their license suspended, they might just keep driving as long as they don't get pulled over.

I generally don't like technical solutions to social problems. Our cars are getting too smart for their own good anyway. The car companies are putting all this telemetry in there, and some have been recently caught selling your driving history to insurance companies. I definitely don't want the government punishing people based on cameras they can't see. We could decide "hey, why not let the government install nannys into the cars of people who speed". But then there's not much of a stretch between that and having the government give everyone a nanny.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

We already have such Nannies for repeat drunk drivers so how is this different? It even fits with the narrative that we don’t know who is driving- we know the car is being driven dangerously so should prevent that regardless of driver

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

You realized you just proved my point. "We already have nannies for X, why not for Y" leads quickly to "Why not have nannies in all cars", and then to "We have nannies in all the cars why can't we turn off cars with criminals in them?".

Can you imagine how much worse things could be if Trump's gestapo could disable cars remotely?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

And yet they’re talking about a nanny as a local device temporarily attached to a car and that does not necessarily “phone home”. Not everything is a “slippery slope”

And yes, speed governors were all too common after the 1970s fuel crisis. As far as I know they still are on trucks, like rental moving trucks. This is not a new thing, except to allow a court to mandate it for repeat egregious offenders

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

And yet they’re talking about a nanny as a local device temporarily attached to a car and that does not necessarily “phone home”.

Oh, my sweet summer child. You don't actually believe that, do you? Read up on the stuff coming to new cars in the US next year ....

[–] incompetent@programming.dev 1 points 15 hours ago

For those unfamiliar:

TL;DR: The 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act requires all new cars sold after September 2027 to include technology that monitors whether you're impaired or distracted—and can prevent you from driving. Infrared cameras will track your eyes, breath sensors will measure alcohol, and your car can refuse to start or limit its speed. Privacy advocates warn this biometric data could be shared with insurance companies, law enforcement, or sold to data brokers.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Here in austrlaia, the fine goes to the owner unless they make a declaration as to who was actually driving.

You get penalty points on your licence for speeding and other offences. Get enough points in a period and you lose your licence.

At high risk times, like public holiday weekends, where lots of people travel, there are double points.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah, but we're talking about the USA, where everything is stupid.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jtrek@startrek.website 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Cool. Fuck cars. Take transit in NYC.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nobody drives in nyc because there’s too much traffic

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Exactly, how does one even speed there

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›