this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
205 points (99.0% liked)

News

37464 readers
1699 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bravesilvernest@lemmy.ml 42 points 6 days ago (1 children)

But hey! No money for healthcare, sorry.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 days ago

Just saw another article about how they're trying to cut SSI/SSDI payments for disabled people who live with their families.

The level of malice and greed from these politicians is astounding...

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Which means it’s far more than that

[–] 0li0li@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I actually saw that number a good 3-4 weeks ago.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 9 points 6 days ago

"Stop the count"

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

wow it's all in interceptors because they won't buy interceptor drones from ukrain and use missiles instead

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 3 points 5 days ago

Hey raytheon needs to get paid....

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 3 points 6 days ago

And obviously ignores indirect costs

[–] TheGoldenV@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago

The people can eat ballroom.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

And even by war standards the us has kinda done nothing?

Bases in the area? Evacuated.

Allies in the area? Wishing they where not.

Friendly Oil infrastructure? On fire.

Iran's fighting capacity? Largely unchanged and now decentralized and acting independently (that is a bad thing for the us)

The strait? Now double closed.

Us image as a superpower? shattered.

[–] DiarrheaSommelier@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The USA is utterly unmatched in its capability to destroy things militarily. But for nearly 80 years has been utterly incapable of fighting a war.

[–] GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

That's because winning wars is bad for business. If the war ends, who will keep buying the killing machines?

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 5 days ago

Yeah I was going to say they can't seem to hold territory at all, but this conflict showed they can't even degrade the military of a near modern nation anymore. The logistics of the us military have also seemed to collapse if the state of their ships and lack of advanced munitions are to go by.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

and yet, they STILL can't get universal healthcare. Fuckwits.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

they do just for military members and thier "tricareatops/dependapotamus"(a term use by former or current about spouses dating service member solely for this healthcare option) spouses and low costs, plus cheap housing loans.

[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

$25 billion for the world not to pay attention what Israel does to Libanon is not that bad.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

This is at most half the actual cost. The economic losses alone were estimated at like 600 billion. Its so dumb and there's nothing to show for it but a pile of dead children.

Is making Netanyahu happy worth any of this? But hey a lot of really shitty people are now richer.

[–] GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago

Not quite nothing to show for it, Iran now controls the strait of hormuz

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Assuming this is entirelly honest, this is only the direct costs of the US military action, not the military costs of Israel which the US subsidizes or indirect costs to American businesses and consumers due to higher energy costs as well as due to, higher in various production chains a lack or higher prices of things produced in plants in counries in the area which are US allies and hence were destroyed by Iran or which are exported in routes that go via the Strait.

And then on top of the above described costs for the US, all the non-military costs also apply to the rest of the World almost certainly adding up to many-fold the costs for the US. Even in an American-centric perspective the ill-will towards the US from this has future costs for the US in terms of missing international business opportunities and reduced preference abroad for American products.

Then on top of that there is additional damage to the image of the US at governmental level all over the World which can even accelerated the end of the Reserve Currency status for the USD, and which depending on much that's accelerated would mean Economic losses for the US next to which the $25 billion are a microscopic amount.

The whole thing is proper next level winning! /s

[–] Kazel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago

So much winning they will get sick of it

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 10 points 6 days ago

That means at least $50b

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

25 billion to cover up the pedo masterminds crimes to protect the pedo pres. Not one cent to help me out. Not one.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Oil and greater israel

[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 7 points 5 days ago

Dept of War: It’s not a war! Don’t call it a war!

[–] GlassHalfHopeful@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

US-Iran War Cost Tracker

Ceasefire — Standby Costs Operation Epic Fury

Last updated: April 29, 2026 · Auto-refreshed from CSIS, Pentagon, and Penn Wharton models

Total Estimated Cost to US Taxpayers $31.63B

  • 60 Days Since Start
  • $2,025 Current Rate/sec
  • $7.29M Current Rate/hour
  • $175.00M Standby Rate/day

Src: https://militaryspend.org/us-iran-war

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 3 points 5 days ago

god damn. $2K a second??? that's what i get over a month!

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 5 days ago

pretty sure its more than that. 90bn was spent on having luxury/bougie vacation experience for hesgeth and the top brass on the military.

[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 5 points 6 days ago

What are some comparable costs for domestic policies? A website said Medicare for all is 3.2T a year. Others?

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 4 points 5 days ago

Also costs entire world a shitton of money. We should all send invoices to Israel and US.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago

I presume that means cost the US military $25bil? It’s presumably also cost Iran, Israel, and everyone else in the world.

Epic fury...how about Epic fail 😅🤣....what a bunch of clowns.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

But fuck thr poor

[–] Mohamed@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The guy said, "Right now, the war is costing us $25 billion" or something close to that. Is it just me, or is that weird phrasing? Wouldnt you say "The war cost us ... so far" rather than use the present tense "costing us"?

[–] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

present perfect would be the pest tense.

Has cost us so far.

[–] DiarrheaSommelier@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago

Remember, every single person in that administration is stupider than the stupidest person you have ever met. Reasonable syntax is a pretty huge ask here.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

LOL.

Does that include damage from the Iranians? Because between the missile defense systems and base damage, Iran has probably caused more than 25B in damage itself.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Yeah, but we absolutely could not tolerate a funny laugh.

Things would be way worse if we had allowed that.

Thank God we dodged that bullet.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Complete lie. More like at least 100 billion if not more in direct costs. And of course that doesn't take into consideration the massive negative effects on the US economy.

Yeah uh, we should probably move the decimal one digit to the right for accuracy

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If the pentagon says something in 2026 I'm going to assu.e it's either completely false or exaggerated in some way.

[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 1 points 5 days ago

100%

Either it cost way more and they are hiding it. Or it cost less, and they stole the difference.

[–] faizalr@fedia.io 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Seems like a waste to me.