165
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 60 points 6 months ago

I’d vote for a rutabaga if it was running against the orange sandwich

[-] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 44 points 6 months ago

All the media have to do is cover Trump relatively honestly and he will do the rest to sink his presidential campaign.

In 2016 the media were so gaga over his norm breaking and other wackiness and everyone assumed Hillary was a sure thing compared to him, they didn't actually cover him honestly.

Plus he could let people just project whatever hopes and dreams they had on him. He had no governmental experience at any level to investigate and draw conclusions from. He convinced a lot of people that he would fight for them, and Hillary had no really solid counter to all that. Plus the DOJ threw the in-person voting to Trump.

This time we know basically all there is to know about what a second Trump term would be like. Chaos, petty revenge, and burning the Constitution. If Democrats can take that clear and the media can look past all the dollar signs for a second, any half decent candidate on the Democratic ticket will win. Any candidate who can legitimately claim to be for working people and against the elites.

So like a Sherrod Brown, Sheldon Whitehouse, John Fetterman, or Elizabeth Warren. I'd say Bernie but he's probably too old. Brown and Fetterman would do really well bringing large so called "purple" states in.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 62 points 6 months ago

Trump is still polling within reach of a win, and that's after 4 years of President Trump, an attempted coup, and three more years of the criminal prosecutions that followed.

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago

You forgot Trump's civil case where the judge clarified it was in fact rape.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Apparently, 40% of American voters would prefer to live in Russia.

[-] Fraylor@lemm.ee 16 points 6 months ago

"look past all the dollar signs for a second"

We're doomed.

[-] Twentytwodividedby7@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

I love John Fetterman, but he did have a mild stroke and spent a month in treatment for depression while in office. He's great, but I don't think he is President material. I don't hold either of those things against him, and mental health is important, but no way do you convince the public that all is fine

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] CoffeeAddict@kbin.social 10 points 6 months ago

I hope you're right. I was definitely one of those people who thought Hillary was a slam dunk and thought Trump would never win.

I've not been confident in an election cycle since. I want to be optimistic and say Trump will sink himself and that we will all have the satifaction of seeing his ass in prison. But, he has weasled his way out of every negative consequence in his life and survived political scandals that would have sunk any other politician.

The dude is a cult.

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 34 points 6 months ago
[-] TheControlled@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I've never been so happy to be beaten to the punch.

[-] spudwart@spudwart.com 3 points 6 months ago

This line was used to remove the plot armor from Luke and raise the stakes.

This is a bad omen.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 6 months ago

I thought it was used to drop a random, unforeshadowed twist into the plot to resolve a love triangle with incest.

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 32 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Taylor Swift slowly walks forward

[-] IronRain@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

Funnily enough, I had this conversation with some friends that Taylor Swift would probably sweep the electoral college. Highly popular, progressive, white (to get a few of the Republican voters whose vote is base on the way their rep looks), and has a fan base that can potentially outmatch MAGA if her name was on the ballot.

Whether she would be a successful politician, on the other hand, can be cleared by the fact that we survived 4 years of Trump. So it can't be worse than that fiasco.

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 16 points 6 months ago

And then she'd make her turn to the right once she met the political machine's real force.

I'm categorically against rich people in high public offices.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

She's also a billionaire now and we all know what happens to billionaires...

[-] Jode@midwest.social 13 points 6 months ago

With John Stewart as VP. He said he doesn't want to be president but VP? Let's fuckin goooo

[-] CoffeeAddict@kbin.social 12 points 6 months ago

If it weren't real life I'd like to see that go down lmao.

It would also be hilarious to see Trump's reaction to being taken down by the Swifties.

[-] jayemar@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago

If only she she were a year older

[-] lapommedeterre@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

I guess she'd be of age by inauguration?

[-] jayemar@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

Oh you're right, I was doing the math for election day, not inauguration day

[-] the_q@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago
[-] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 months ago

Fetterman from the top rope.

[-] dhtseany@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago

Obama: The Return of Hope?

[-] Pronell@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Suddenly out of the shadows leaps Malia, dragonglass dagger in hand.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 8 points 6 months ago

One of the last things we need is another political empire built on nepotism and one's surname.

[-] Pronell@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Yes. It was just a joke.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 3 points 6 months ago

And she offers up the whispered scream, "Am I that somebody?"

[-] Kalothar@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

Oh and who is thi— ooh my god it’s the Undertaker

[-] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

22nd Amendment says "nope!"

[-] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Oh, now we care about the law!

[-] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

How about Michelle then? Name recognition and more experience than Big Cheeto had when he took the job.

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 15 points 6 months ago

A six year old child should be able to defeat Trump. At least in all forms of debate and intelligence tests.

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 6 months ago

But could a six year old remember, "Person, Woman, Man, Camera, TV"?

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

Yes. And also be able to spell those things.

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 12 points 6 months ago

Bernie Sanders: "So you're saying there's a chance?"

[-] Deadeyegai@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

And he probably would have won too if the DNC didn't give him the absolute shaft because it was "Hillary's Time". Now we still see ourselves in the stupidity timelime

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 9 points 6 months ago

If he isn't I'd imagine it's a short list of other contenders that have the electoral width Biden can hypothetically pull from

[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Jeff Merkley, progressive 3-term senator who takes common sense positions even when controversial, e.g. calling for a ceasefire in Gaza weeks ago

[-] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 months ago

The problem with someone like Dean is that time and time again, the average American has shown themselves to be embarrassingly uninformed when it comes to politics, and so the incumbent president has a huge advantage just by having their name be recognizable and their butt already in the chair.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
165 points (95.6% liked)

politics

18050 readers
2656 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS