this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2026
230 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29386 readers
1554 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 32 points 4 days ago (2 children)

lobbying should be 100% illegal. corporate donations should be 100% illegal. and donations from foreign nations should be considered as treason and bring the death penalty...

Although the bar is so low, that said rules would basically execute every politician in America.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Absolutely. Lobbyists are criminals.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There's value to be had in industry experts advising governments. Think about your old ass representative regulating the internet without any advice from people who have actually used the internet. The problem is not that the government converses with industry, it's that lobbyists bribe politicians under false pretenses. Outlaw the exchange of money, not ideas.

[–] Today@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

I work in education with the lowest kids, most functioning below 12 months. We had a representative visit one of my schools one day. He had no idea that these kids exist and come to school. These are the people making laws regarding state testing and school funding. Politicians desperately need to be educated!

[–] fonix232@fedia.io -2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Corporations should be able to voice their opinions, support (in the sense of "I think this new regulation is a good/bad idea because [...]", not in the sense of $$$$), and such about legislation.

Corporations should not be allowed to influence those legislations beyond the aforementioned, by providing $$$/favours/kickbacks to politicians.

Just like people, companies can have opinions, but that's it. No further influence.

[–] HermitBee@feddit.uk 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Just like people, companies can have opinions, but that's it. No further influence.

What the fuck is it with people treating companies like people? Companies are not people.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 0 points 3 days ago

Where did I say I treat them like people? I very specifically differentiated them, drawing the only parallel between the two groups, namely that they can have opinions...

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Companies are led by people, and those people can have opinions. After that, fuck right the hell off. You’re delusional if you think company should be able to have opinions.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They don't, the company hires lobbyists. AKA people. To argue for them.

If you take that away, you take away the constitutional right of all citizens to petition their government.

What we need is regulation

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

Corps aren’t people. We can take away their toys while still keeping ours.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io -1 points 3 days ago

The difference is, individuals can have vastly different opinions on a topic than a grouping they're in (even if that grouping happens to be a company).

Companies are essentially that, a formal representation of the interests of a specific group. That does not make their opinion any more important than a singular person's, but the opinion itself should be recognised. Nothing beyond that, just recognised, it doesn't even have to be considered.

And this is literally what I'm saying, let the shareholders loudmouth all they want, limit their ability to influence others to this only - speech. Not money, not favours, not tit for tat, not kickbacks, not bribes, speech. Let them huff hot air all they want, let them exhaust themselves, and see the world go on without giving a fuck about it. Kinda like street preachers. They're annoying but essentially harmless. Limit companies to this level instead of allowing them to ruin our planet.

And as to why let them keep this one thing: it's not because I want to hear their crap. Or that I want to give them human rights. Far from it. I just want to enjoy seeing said shareholders exhaust themselves with the sole method they have to "influence" things. I want to see them spend countless hours, countless cups of coffee, countless tears and sweat drops, on achieving nothing. Like those prank videos where they put shampoo onto people's head as they shower, an endless frustration of trying to rinse it out and it still being fucking foamy. I want to see that but on a corporate level. Because as long as they're busy trying to get more weight behind their voices, they can't go on and scheme against the world that much.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'll disagree, companies are led by shareholder interest, not people. the CEO? replaceable the moment shareholders want, he isn't the leader.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Shareholders are people, you dolt.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

they aren't, they just want number go up, no interest whatsoever about the company. and all their individual opinions are averaged out.

and most of them aren't even people, but institutions, banks, funds...

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Who runs the institutions, banks, and funds? Yes, they are stupid and short-sighted and greedy but ultimately that does not mean they get to hide behind a company. You talk about them having a pretty singular interest and then say it’s all averaged out, but the average between a pool of nearly the exact same opinions isn’t particularly important or nuanced.

Companies do not get opinions. If the people who run them want to share their voice they can vote like everyone else, and if they don’t like democracy they can drown themselves in their pools.

those institutions are human, and have no human interests. they are a super organism. an emergent behavior of our capitalist society. they are literally burning the planet and killing us in the millions.

they get an opinion about things the same way a cancer gets an opinion about treatment.

Just like people, companies can have opinions,

and said statements should be a fart in the wind. better yet, shouldn't exist

[–] whosepoopisonmybuttocks@sh.itjust.works 20 points 4 days ago (3 children)

How do we get more Bernies, AOC's and Mamdani's?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 3 days ago

Vote for them, and tell the DNC and your current reps to support their legislation and ideas.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago

Primary establishment Dems. And even then, as we saw in Illinois this past primary election, consolidate progressives around the same candidate. Vote splitting is the death of the Left in a First Past The Post (FPTP) system.

Once we get Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in more places and eventually everywhere, then we can vote to our heart's content.

Electionalism might not work even then with how late stage capitalism is faring. Organizing and mutual aide are our only future then.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 days ago

Surely by making more purity tests and calling people who support AOC liberals and Zionists

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

It must go.

There is no possibility of fair and equal government as long as it exists.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 8 points 4 days ago

Best they can do is a sternly worded letter.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 7 points 4 days ago

Keep shouting, Bernie. One day, someone in power might even listen.

[–] Jabroni@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

He's right.

The only thing that will save the United States is overturning Citizens United. Everything else is secondary.

If you want representatives who are there as actual public servants, allowing them to accept money from large donors makes them a for-profit entity.

Everything we hear that would "fix" the US can be attributed to Citizens United.

Immigration reform? Guess what - industries thrive on the broken system, and they pay to keep it broken.

You want Congress to take back control of who the US goes to war with? Defense contractors are some of the largest donors in the country. War will remain a racket.

Ranked-choice voting and 3rd party redistricting? The US's two-party system is funded by those large donors and thrives in this system.

You can't fix this without removing the dark money first.

It is the only thing I care about in a politician at this point. I get that being a single issue voter is dumb, but this is so foundational that once it's overturned, we can start getting back to the issues at hand.

[–] furtiveParalysis@jlai.lu 3 points 3 days ago

I want to see more bernie and less trump!

[–] Jaegeras@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago

The DNC is just very ready for this perfectly sane man to drop.

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago

Fuck it, I don't care if he's old. Bernie's Ghost 2028

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Arrest every Israeli backed politician for treason