this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2026
413 points (95.0% liked)

General Memes & Private Chuckle

915 readers
265 users here now

Welcome to General Memes

Memes for the masses, chuckles for the chosen.

Rule 1: Be Civil, Not CruelWe’re here for laughs, not fights.

  • No harassment, dogpiling, or brigading
  • No bigotry (transphobia, racism, sexism, etc.)
  • Keep it light — argue in the comments, not with insults

Rule 2: No Forbidden FormatsNot every image deserves immortality on the memmlefield. That means:

  • No spam or scams
  • No porn or sexually explicit content
  • No illegal content (seriously, don’t ruin the fun)
  • NSFW memes must be properly tagged

If you see a post that breaks the rules, report it so the mods can take care of it.

Otherwise consider this your call to duty. Get posting or laughing. Up to you

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EtnaAtsume@lemmy.world 75 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If this became more widespread, all it would achieve would be the addition of child fees, not the removal of pet fees.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 11 points 1 month ago

I bet you could take it to court and get all those fees removed, since the precedent has already been set.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 73 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Apartments charging pet fees: 🫸

Apartments charging child fees: 🫸

Landlords being charged with crimes: 👍

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

Landleeches being charged at with the nearest blunt object: :3

[–] restingOface@quokk.au 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They would absolutely charge a "children fee" if they were legally able to.

[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You all understand that the children fee is literally paying for enough space to house children? Do your cats have their own room? ;)

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 1 month ago

My cat has their own apartment. They just let us live there.

[–] Rusty@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

My cats think that my rooms are their.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wolfrasin@lemmy.today 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Excuse me, but the bigger scam is the entire Landlord concept

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

Social housing, which is “owned” by the community as a whole, is the answer. Not only for people who are not yet ready to own, but also for housing in general.

Vienna is a prime model for this, where social housing is frequently much cheaper than ever owning a home. Most families that start out in social housing cling to it their entire life because it is just so much more financially responsible.

[–] DiabolicalBird@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 month ago (5 children)

This sounds like someone that has never seen what cats can do to a property when the owner doesn't take care of them.

Piss drenched carpet and moldy walls are a pain in the ass to fix.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You ever seen what half-arse parented kids will do? All of the above + holes and pest infestations

[–] forkDestroyer@infosec.pub 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If you don't like what the kids can do, wait until you see what the grown-ups can accomplish.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DiabolicalBird@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

I worked retail for many years and I consider children pests as well

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

That's how onr apartment of mine got flooded. Kid 2 floors up was playing with the plumbing

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] charonn0@startrek.website 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fees for children would be illegal discrimination under fair housing laws.

[–] i_love_FFT@jlai.lu 18 points 1 month ago (13 children)

They would charge extra if it was not illegal

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

They would make them dig coal if it was not illegal

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago

This goes for everything...

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] ignirtoq@feddit.online 9 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I vaguely recall reading that such child fees would likely be illegal (in the US)? I think it might also be illegal to exclude families with children from being eligible to rent a given location. Don't quote me on either, though, because I don't have sources on hand.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 6 points 1 month ago

In Brazil is illegal for landlords or apartment buildings to charge or prohibit pets on their units. They are some laws around, like it should be as big as you can charge it on your arms, can't use the common areas unless designated pet areas and can't be loud at night.

[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's provincial here in Canada but I vaguely remember some building having a no child rule and then losing a court case when the strata tried to evict folks who ended up having kids.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I would love to live in that utopia. No children allowed in an entire suburb would be heaven.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

It's not legal to charge pet fees if it's for a service animal so it's probably related to that in some.

For services animals they cannot even enforce size or breed restrictions. I have in laws that used this to get a pit bull for their child with Down Syndrome. It wasn't a fee dodge, the apartment had a blanket no pet policy.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I once toured an apartment that charged pet fees and for dogs REQUIRED A DNA TEST so they could fine you for not picking up poop.

Someone out there is dna testing literal dog shit.

[–] MML@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

No one is actually doing that, they're changing a fee to do nothing until someone complains enough that they'll send out a strongly worded letter hoping the person not picking up their dog poop will admit to it out of fear.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I lived in a complex that required such samples from dogs. They still never did anything about all the shit lying around

[–] krathalan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

Same here. lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I have done a lot of residential work over the years a lot of sales work a lot of things where I've been in a lot of people's houses. Nothing smells worse than a person with cats who even goes a week or two without taking care of their litter box. And that smells sticks in everything. I have pets and I agree that a pet deposit is something needed because damn they do a lot of damage.

[–] usrtrv@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

But isn't that literally what the deposit is for? You don't just assume someone will have excess damage when renting.

And sure, have a higher deposit for pet owners. But why am I paying a monthly cat fee on top of a one time "non-refundable pet deposit".

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Entheogen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Last time I was charged a pet fee, I asked them "So if my wife gets pregnant, do we need to plan to pay extra on the rent?"

The leasing agent looked at me like I was crazy and said "Of course not, that would be ridiculous!"

And then she realized... Like I could literally see it flash across her face. She dropped it.

[–] Kkk2237pl@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Nice, in Poland landlords wants to be sure if you dont have kids, because they wont rent you apartment.

When my gf moved to me, my landlord increased my rent by 20%. Rent only, Im not talking about bills

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

Just landlords gouging every cent.

[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 6 points 1 month ago

Tough one. I've never wanted kids and my God are they so goddamn loud...

But, as more of my friends have kids I feel more and more for parents, it's damned tough to raise kids and finding housing, especially in my city is brutal.

Still, not like a fee helps anyone beyond the landlord.

[–] solidheron@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Don't give them ideas

[–] the_abecedarian@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago

don't spread this pro landlord bs

[–] drolex@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago (23 children)

Children are members of society. They're imperfect, but still. As other members of society, we have a duty to at least tolerate them.

I find it very sad that some people treat them like a different species. You wouldn't hear people say, without being countered, "I don't want to see old people" or "I don't want to have to interact with women". It's fucked up, you don't choose the other members of society.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

All it takes is one untrained dog with separation anxiety to chew through walls and tear trim off of door frames to trigger rules like this.

Or one elderly pet with severe incontinence peeing in the closest carpeted corner instead of the litter box.

With that said, children certainly have a much greater capacity for damage, especially when they get older. Infants? Not so much.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes and what does that fee have to do with it?

Security Deposits are already double rent, and the entire legal system including property insurance still exists.

The $100/month isn't going anywhere except to profit.

load more comments
view more: next ›