this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
70 points (84.3% liked)

politics

29363 readers
2250 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheGoldenV@lemmy.world 85 points 4 days ago (9 children)

A robust primary to find the best possible candidate?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago

Hey, how many other presidential candidates have made it to a general election while never earning a single primary delegate in their entire career?!

She's a once in a generation candidate!

/s

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Best I can do is sheepdogging and pre-blaming you for the failures of the corporate establishement

-BlueMAGA

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago

No no! Let's shove a preselected candidate down everyone's throat and hope they hold their noses. That'll be good enough! Best out of 3!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago

If you lose to Donald Trump, you are literally unelectable.

[–] Steve@communick.news 57 points 4 days ago (41 children)

She's an idiot to think her loss to a convict and rapist was anyone's fault but her own. She'll have even less of a chance against any reasonable candidate.

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 32 points 4 days ago (10 children)

"I bet you won't vote for a woman!"

... Ok... Do you have any policy positions we should know about?

"You wouldn't vote for THAT guy over a woman would you?!"

Please ... We literally just want healthc-

"LOOK, REPUBLICANS THAT DON'T LIKE HIM!"

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (40 replies)
[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 49 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Go home and stay there, you are not wanted, your fight is done.

You lost and you can never be what this world and country needs right now.

Fuck Newsome too.

I don't want centrist Republican playmates, I want progressive left scorched earth justice.

[–] cenariodantesco@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm not American but gimme that AOC baby

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

America will not vote for:

  1. A woman

  2. Any ethnicity

  3. Anyone under 60

[–] Cherries@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Kamala Harris did not lose because of those qualities. She lost because she ran as a diet Republican, going for a marginal victory.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

There was also all of that fraud

Even still, Harris couldn't beat an empty chair

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Kamala and I have one more thing in common: We have the same exact chance of being elected President in 2028.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] EtAl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I know what it requires

Do you? You were happy to fund Bibi's genocide in Gaza, and it lost you the election. You moved to the right, and it lost you the election. You wouldn't distance yourself from Biden, and it lost you the election.

Take the hint.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Frankly, the American voting public cares less about the unjust deaths of untold many foreign folks than the price of eggs 8 months before the vote.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zd9@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago

NO.

GET THE FUCK AWAY FROM NATIONAL POLITICS.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

Given by her parties recent rulings on how to deal with AIPAC, I don't believe anyone in that party knows what it requires.

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Dude read the room

Kamala. Exit the echo chamber. Read the room. We need change, not a return to the status quo that gave us Trump 2.0. Don't be an opportunist.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Its fine, she has zero chance of winning a primary.

load more comments (1 replies)

For the love of god fuck off. Nobody is going to vote for you. This would all but guarantee another republican win even after all of this

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 days ago
[–] Mudman@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago

Everyone should vote for Afroman!

[–] ulkesh@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago

As much as I might like her, she will not win. No one likes hearing this, but there are simply too many racist and misogynist voters for her to ever win. Then add the fact that a convicted felon and likely pedophile won against her already.

It’s time to move on from the typical DNC bullshit and get someone who will vow to prosecute every last corrupt piece of shit in this current administration and vow to impeach and remove all corrupt judges and justices, especially those put there by this administration.

The DNC needs to stop fucking around.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago

In order to win it requires you to fuck off somewhere else.

[–] weaselsrippedmyflesh@piefed.social 19 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I'd say Democrats never learn from their mistakes, but there probably won't even be a 2028 election.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 days ago
[–] core@leminal.space 6 points 3 days ago

The DNC has won in court on the premise that they are a private institution and can nominate whoever they want and put whoever they want on the ballot.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The only people I'm interested in voting for are those currently pushing back against the regime. Beyond a few tweets or comments, she hasn't even tried.

[–] Vupware@lemmy.zip 14 points 4 days ago

She vanished off the face of the earth post-election, only to come back with a book to peddle. Now she wants to run again? Fuck off!!!!

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

It requires not supporting Israel. Have you thought about that?

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Stealing AOC’s thunder.

Tell me liberal Dems aren’t controlled opposition.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 days ago

Lmao. Didn't seem like she really gave a fuck last time. Why bother now?

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

"I know what it requires".

I refer you to Sun Tzu: One may know how to conquer but not be able to do so.

load more comments
view more: next ›