this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
85 points (85.1% liked)

politics

29839 readers
2017 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheGoldenV@lemmy.world 95 points 1 month ago (9 children)

A robust primary to find the best possible candidate?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Hey, how many other presidential candidates have made it to a general election while never earning a single primary delegate in their entire career?!

She's a once in a generation candidate!

/s

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

No no! Let's shove a preselected candidate down everyone's throat and hope they hold their noses. That'll be good enough! Best out of 3!

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Best I can do is sheepdogging and pre-blaming you for the failures of the corporate establishement

-BlueMAGA

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Steve@communick.news 60 points 1 month ago (55 children)

She's an idiot to think her loss to a convict and rapist was anyone's fault but her own. She'll have even less of a chance against any reasonable candidate.

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (13 children)

"I bet you won't vote for a woman!"

... Ok... Do you have any policy positions we should know about?

"You wouldn't vote for THAT guy over a woman would you?!"

Please ... We literally just want healthc-

"LOOK, REPUBLICANS THAT DON'T LIKE HIM!"

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (54 replies)
[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Go home and stay there, you are not wanted, your fight is done.

You lost and you can never be what this world and country needs right now.

Fuck Newsome too.

I don't want centrist Republican playmates, I want progressive left scorched earth justice.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago

If you lose to Donald Trump, you are literally unelectable.

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

NO.

GET THE FUCK AWAY FROM NATIONAL POLITICS.

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Kamala and I have one more thing in common: We have the same exact chance of being elected President in 2028.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] cenariodantesco@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I'm not American but gimme that AOC baby

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] EtAl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I know what it requires

Do you? You were happy to fund Bibi's genocide in Gaza, and it lost you the election. You moved to the right, and it lost you the election. You wouldn't distance yourself from Biden, and it lost you the election.

Take the hint.

load more comments (4 replies)

For the love of god fuck off. Nobody is going to vote for you. This would all but guarantee another republican win even after all of this

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

In order to win it requires you to fuck off somewhere else.

[–] weaselsrippedmyflesh@piefed.social 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I'd say Democrats never learn from their mistakes, but there probably won't even be a 2028 election.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Kamala. Exit the echo chamber. Read the room. We need change, not a return to the status quo that gave us Trump 2.0. Don't be an opportunist.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The only people I'm interested in voting for are those currently pushing back against the regime. Beyond a few tweets or comments, she hasn't even tried.

[–] Vupware@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 month ago

She vanished off the face of the earth post-election, only to come back with a book to peddle. Now she wants to run again? Fuck off!!!!

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Given by her parties recent rulings on how to deal with AIPAC, I don't believe anyone in that party knows what it requires.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"I know what it requires".

I refer you to Sun Tzu: One may know how to conquer but not be able to do so.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Dude read the room

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Its fine, she has zero chance of winning a primary.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

It requires not supporting Israel. Have you thought about that?

[–] ulkesh@piefed.social 10 points 1 month ago

As much as I might like her, she will not win. No one likes hearing this, but there are simply too many racist and misogynist voters for her to ever win. Then add the fact that a convicted felon and likely pedophile won against her already.

It’s time to move on from the typical DNC bullshit and get someone who will vow to prosecute every last corrupt piece of shit in this current administration and vow to impeach and remove all corrupt judges and justices, especially those put there by this administration.

The DNC needs to stop fucking around.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago
[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago

Lmao. Didn't seem like she really gave a fuck last time. Why bother now?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago
load more comments
view more: next ›