this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
76 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14332 readers
586 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net 13 points 8 hours ago
[–] plinky@hexbear.net 11 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

reactor vessel failsafes are usually posted right in the maintenance manual, usually with contact the manufacturer immediately warning

Also catalytic/inhibition of decomposition x provides some very concerning info about dropping the ignition temperature/making stuff unreliable, but of course one only searches such things academically in libraries, with appropriate precautions

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

An interesting aside is that one of the main reasons the space shuttle, and by extension the SLS used for Artemis II, uses solid rocket boosters is as a bit of graft for that Utah AP plant.

[–] someone@hexbear.net 9 points 9 hours ago

There's a lesser-known similar situation with ESA's Ariane's side boosters. They share tech with France's M51 sub-launched ICBMs, they're both made by ArianeGroup.

[–] XxFemboy_Stalin_420_69xX@hexbear.net 42 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

this really has me thinking about that horrible story about a no good worker who burned down an innocent warehouse in ontario, california. soviet-hmm

[–] BattleCossack@hexbear.net 3 points 8 hours ago

Commodocide

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 24 points 12 hours ago
[–] bunnossin@hexbear.net 26 points 12 hours ago
[–] aanes_appreciator@hexbear.net 13 points 12 hours ago

Yeah but what about the bean logistics