this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
347 points (99.7% liked)

News

37032 readers
2190 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump’s threats to carry out mass bombing of civilian infrastructure in Iran present US military officers with a dilemma: disobey orders or help commit war crimes.

It is an urgent matter for the US chain of command. In an expletive-laden threat, Trump set a Tuesday 8pm Washington time deadline for the Iranian government to open the strait of Hormuz or face “Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day, all wrapped up in one”.

There is little debate among legal experts that such an attack on the life-supporting infrastructure for 93 million Iranians would constitute a war crime.

“Such rhetorical statements – if followed through – would amount to the most serious war crimes – and thus the president’s statements place service members in a profoundly challenging situation,” two former judge advocate general (JAG) officers, Margaret Donovan and Rachel VanLandingham wrote on the website Just Security on Monday.

“As former uniformed military lawyers who advised targeting operations, we know the president’s words run counter to decades of legal training of military personnel and risk placing our warfighters on a path of no return.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 28 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not saying it's easy, but it is simple. Disobey illegal orders.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly. It's not an "urgent matter for the chain of command", it's a settled matter of policy predicated on the unlawful murder of millions.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Agreed. I regret that the consequences for doing the right thing could be very high, but doesn't it just seem like case in so many instances? What a backwards species humans are. No consequences for the guy causing all of the problems but how dare you do the right thing to everyone who rightfully objects.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

No one wants to be excluded from the group, that’s our nature. It means immediate end of career and likely a bunch of hate speech and death threats to the first officer who openly says “no, I refuse that order,” so I can understand why no one has done it….but it’s also the WHOLE FUCKING OATH so I can’t believe no one has done it. More will follow unless we let this purge continue quietly

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago

The orange cancer won't be here forever. You commit war crimes, you will find yourself on a very unpleasant trial.

Grow some fucking spines. You commit these war crimes on the demand of a pedophile rapist felon, then you deserve the same fate. You will be a disgrace, a pariah.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 15 points 11 hours ago

They know the rules, and several elected officials reminded them in video messages that were very controversial.

They are walking into this with their eyes wide open, knowing the entire world is watching. If they accept those orders, and carry them out, they know it will not be forgotten, they will be punished for it eventually. They deserve no mercy if they follow that path.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 36 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

That's not a "dilemma." You don't commit war crimes. You absolutely have the right and the duty to refuse illegal orders

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

I genuinely didn't expect that level of "both sides"-ism from The Guardian.

[–] toad@lemmy.wtf 34 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Ah yes the nazi dilemma.

We solved that one in nuremberg. How is it even a question ffs

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Been a long time since then. It ain't that they forgot, it's that they think it shouldn't be their problem

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Operation Paperclip showed them that there can be exceptions written into literally any rule including mass murder, so of course they all assume they’ll be pardoned.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 9 points 12 hours ago

Pedophile orders you to commit war crimes for which you know you eventually WILL be judged...

Mmmmm, that IS a tough one...

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks you fucking maga idiots. We all told you what was up and you ignored us.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

They also ignored all their teachers.

That's how they became MAGAts.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I bet all those big macho MAGAs are breaking down the doors at the recruiting office, riiiight?

[–] BouteilleBrune@lemmy.world 29 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

aren't they illegal orders?

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

the kind of orders where following them would be committing war crimes

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

See the thing is is that you should be afraid of the consequences when you lose. Following illegal orders = war crimes.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Everyone with a functioning brain-cell knows that Trump is going to throw kegsbreath under the bus to save himself, and I for one can't wait to see his smug slick backed face hung for war crimes.

[–] nile_istic@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

Hanged. Ain't no way this textbook case of overcompensating masculine fragility is hung, lbr.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Saluting the Commander and Thief of the US military for trying to claim the "#1 child killer" title.

Also has Congress rubber stamped this shit?

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Congressional Republicans are literal traitors. They rubberstamp anything Trump does.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Spineless, amoral cowards driven solely by enriching themselves so they can afford dubious plastic surgeries.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Not to bothsides the issue because Republicans are literal death cult pedophiles, but big-D Democrats are also complacent. They're using the war to fundraise but have been awfully quiet otherwise

(Seriously, my entire SMS history looks like this)

Literally all spam

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

You gotta be pretty low on the evolutionary ladder to obey orders from a felon rapist pedophile with dementia.

[–] christian@lemmy.ml 8 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Officers now have to decide whether or not to commit war crimes? Wow, that is a dilemma, I wouldn't want to be forced to make that decision. This article does a really good job humanizing their struggle, you can't help but feel bad for them.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

We've already committed war crimes. Thus is just another day at the office.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I've had people tell me that the soldiers firing missiles or piloting drones don't necessarily know that it's a kindergarten they've been ordered to obliterate, and sure I can see that being the case, but don't they see the reports later? And then go back to work and bomb the next thing they're told to?

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 2 points 11 hours ago

Yea so I don’t care. Ignorance isn’t an excuse for us when we speed. It’s not an excuse to kill kids. Question what the fuck your are doing or take the fucking blame for it. It’s so fucking tiring seeing so many people claim they don’t accept responsibility because they chose to be fucking stupid. That’s worse in my eyes and the world would be better off if we all followed that rule.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 22 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

placing our warfighters on a path of no return

Can we go back to calling them soldiers?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 18 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

They are going to automate weaponry so soldiers never face a moral dilemma and get in the way of the war machine.

[–] saimen@feddit.org 3 points 13 hours ago

More like this with MAGA brainwash

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world 153 points 1 day ago (29 children)

SEEMS LIKE A PRETTY FUCKIN' EASY DECISION.

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 3 points 13 hours ago

Sure. But they already fired or demoted most of the military leadership that wasn't on board with following absolutely any order, legal or otherwise. So now the "dilemma" falls mostly to lower-level officers and enlisted.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago

There are plenty of brainwashed talibangelicals in the military who will happily push the world into global war at trump’s command.

load more comments
view more: next ›