this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
232 points (97.9% liked)

196

6032 readers
1324 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] astutemural@midwest.social 57 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Blatantly false. After the Constitution went into effect, a whopping 6% of the population could vote. You had to own a certain amount of property, be male, and not be a Native American or black person. It wasn't a democracy. It was an apartheid oligarchy, and very intentionally set up that way. The founders didn't want the masses of people to vote; several of them were quite afraid of it.

The USA only became a democracy in the 1960s with the Civil Rights Act and its guarantee of universal suffrage. America became a democracy in spite of its origins, not because of it.

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Even then, it's still not a particularly democratic democracy, e.g. disallowing felons from voting means people experiencing problems with the current law have no power to change it. When a citizen's right to vote is conditional, suffrage is not universal.

[–] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago

Disallowing voting on any reason just allows the govt to use it to disenfranchise voters. Systemic biases have ensured that majority of original classes of people ineligible to vote have the largest proportion of disenfranchised voters even today in USA after 60 or 250 years, however you want to count

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Compared to most other countries at the time, it was very democratic.

Yeah the only places that had more democratic means were basically a handful of weird German city states or were gone by the 1700s. The Icelandics arguably were more democratic before being brought under Norway and the Witan of medieval England was similar but both were gone by then.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Benjamin Franklin, in the background, already has four grindr dates lined up for the night

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wouldn't have thought of ol' Benny as gay, considering his taste in women.

[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

No no, he's the bottom.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

More like Ben Franklin is already four rounds in with your mom, after figuring out how to use your time machine all on his own and borrowing it to go pick her up.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

Ben Franklin: "you're telling me these people on the Internet post pictures of their feet... For free?"

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

Good for her!

[–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago

I’d like to think he’s also ripping the penjamin like a chimney

[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wouldn't say it was "fundamentally" founded in democracy when originally only white property owning men could vote.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It was fundamentally founded in the concept of “a king having power over everyone is unfair, but obviously having a ruling class of oligarchs is okay”, and basically has never moved from that point. Just rich white dudes mad at one more powerful rich white dude. They never intended to give up an inch of their own power. They were just salty about the king

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago

And the still provided the role of president with a lot of kingly powers.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Are you trying to imply that the ideas of slave owners from the 18th century are not the gold standard on which society must be based for all eternity going forward?

[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

Jefferson was only a couple years older than me when the Declaration was written. We listened to what some dude in his early 30s thought back then, but nowadays we're too young and lack experience to lead.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

i think he was implying that the founding fathers said we should a2 the government for the health of the people

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To be fair, Trump wasn't corrupted in power, he had already been corrupt for decades. Unless you're using a very broad definition of power, I suppose.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 4 points 1 week ago

He was born with power. Rich parents that owned swaths of land in NYC that gifted a billion dollars worth of assets.

He was corrupted by a lack of love and a surplus of wealth and no repercussions in his life. We really need to stop letting wealthy people get so detached from the human condition. We let people like Ethan Couch argue his wealth doesnt let him understand killing 4 people and then give then probation as if we agree.

Money is power, and its our favorite flavor of corruption.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Why do discussions on the American voting system always insist on a single winner? You don't need Star voting or Preferential voting or instant runoff voting. All of those are trying to elect one candidate from an enormous spectrum of political opinions. Even the best system is going to give poor results.

Instead, try proportional representation: X% of the vote gets you X% of seats. Let them form a coalition with a majority of seats. No shenanigans. No gerrymandering. No vote suppression. No two party system. No negative campaigns.

[–] yellowbadbeast@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, you can't very well proportionally elect a president.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, and therefore the president should have basically no power. Their job should mostly just be going to meetings with other countries on behalf of the government, and other ceremonial stuff.

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Originally, the president did have basically no power. The whole federal government wasn't supposed to do that much, and the executive branch by itself was supposed to do almost nothing compared to today. They didn't even think there would be a standing army. States not being willing to put in strong reforms by themselves led to more executive agencies and executive branch influence over the country. (Which is all controlled by the President, since that made sense for the things that they thought in the 1790s the executive branch would be doing.)

The whole system was made around an idea of who would do what, which has turned out to be completely different after 250 years. It's not really surprising that it isn't working very well.

I don't really know where I'm going with this. To even get a sane and effective Congress, we need voters to be aware of the real world, which seems like the largest hurdle right now. In the past, large and effective reforms have mostly been lead and advertised by the President, although it's possible that with better voting systems and less presidential power parties would be able to cohere behind consistent and strong visions. Conservative think tanks seem to be able to do that currently, but they're very quiet about it and I don't know of a progressive equivalent.

[–] grranibal@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago
[–] froufox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago

i wish Americans had founding mommies instead

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"BL"? I'm sorry, I'm displaying my ignorance, but I'm guessing this does NOT stand for "Black Library"?