this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
575 points (98.6% liked)

Privacy

47474 readers
1293 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lb_o@lemmy.world 16 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

BY ONE FUCKING VOTE!

https://howtheyvote.eu/votes/189574

Vote out every single fucker who is trying to limit our freedoms!

[–] chigga@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

i don't understand, was EPP for or against the extension ? Cause my understanding was that they asked to have a second vote even if the first one already rejected the extension.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Thats actually insane in itself that it got that close. Next time they will succeed. :/

People are so stupid to support this. They dont seem to understand that its never about protecting anyone and its always about building dystopia.

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.ml 26 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Why do we have to keep fighting our own government for our rights? Why can't our government just represent us?

[–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 hours ago

Because unfortunately our rights are opposed to the will of capital and they serve capital first and foremost

[–] Cantaloupe@lemmy.fedioasis.cc 13 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Governments don't represent the common people anymore.

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 hours ago

We should topple the EU then tbh

[–] anugeshtu@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

To put it in Douglas Adams words: Because the politicians are lizards ;)

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Why can't they vote on a ban to do any chat control bills? Stop this nonsense from happening again.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

If you have money you can ask the lobbyists.

[–] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

I imagine they're thinking, "Well we will see what the new vote next month has to say about that!"

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 20 points 15 hours ago

We should go to war against corpocracy, until all corporations are bankrupt.

EVERY. DAMN. ONE.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 69 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Why was chat control allowed to be presented again in the first place.

[–] chigga@lemmy.world 39 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

this is the real thing, this is almost certainly unconstitutional.

greedy corps going against law as usual.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 44 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

No, not really. It's because they retracted the proposal before going to vote, because they knew it wouldnt pass after Germany publicly said they would vote against.

Then they changed some stuff and send it again, which is now rejected as it seems.

Now they need to wait, but they didnt before.

[–] chigga@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

So this war is far from an end huh?

[–] Gumus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago

We have to win every time. They only need to win once.

[–] undeffeined@lemmy.ml 18 points 16 hours ago

They won't stop pushing until they get it

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

April 3, already planned

[–] leagman1@feddit.org 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] guy@piefed.social 3 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

The Commission probably since they're the only entity who can propose law

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] iamtherealwalrus@lemmy.world 23 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Where can I see who voted for and against? I want to know if I need to change who I vote for next EU election.

[–] MoffKalast@lemmy.world 21 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (5 children)

Scroll down and select your country: https://fightchatcontrol.eu/

It's always the ones you most expect.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] chigga@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

I think that Patrick posted it. basically the ones against where the conservatives, both left and right where against (even if there were some people inside those parities who voted to continue the scanning)

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

What?
I see conservatives+ extreme right pro. Also some fake left

Against greens -real left.

(Not absolute since they vote individually)

But by faction:

pro: EPP,ECR, ID/Patriots

Against: EFA, The Left, Renew Europe, S&D(divided)

Undecided: S&D, Renew Europe

[–] WaxRhetorical@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

For those of us out of the loop, who is Patrick?

[–] kapulsa@feddit.org 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Probably Patrick Breyer, who often posts about privacy issues in the EU parliament.

https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/

[–] WaxRhetorical@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago
[–] dingleberrylover@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Definitely not a Krusty Krab

[–] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 16 hours ago

i think they mean patrick breyer from the german pirate party

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 14 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

they will keep trying in the most sneaky ways until they are deposed. they only need to succeed once.

[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 38 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Can it just fuck off for good this time?

[–] chigga@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago
[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 8 points 18 hours ago

it's indicative of the system we're in. our oligarchs have enough money to pay people to push for this in perpetuity while the rest of us are forced to give up some degree of our lives to fight it off on a field of battles that's tilted towards money; they will win eventually unless the system itself is changed.

[–] ceigid@feddit.org 32 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Will they just revote again then until it passes?

[–] chigga@lemmy.world 10 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

hopefully no. but we are still in danger

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

This is indeed the plan. Only 1 time is enough to get this through the system. But it requires 500 times saying no first.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 14 points 18 hours ago

Let’s celebrate this victory… even though it’s concerning that it is a recurring topic :-/

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago

Congratulations!

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

They'll just change a few things and try again. I feel like we've been hearing about chat control on and off for about 5 years now and I can't imagine it'll go away soon.

[–] HuntressHimbo@lemmy.zip 6 points 18 hours ago

Saw this then scrolled more to see the EU going after porn sites for age verification. 😞

[–] Kazel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] lb_o@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Dude, we're protesting now until all those fuckers who voted in favor of chat control are voted out of parliament. We have names!

[–] iByteABit@lemmy.ml 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Good, but pretty meaningless overall while they still allow lobbying to take place.

They pretend to care that lobbying means corruption from corporate interests, but doing anything meaningful to stop lobbying entirely and punish anyone still doing it would be "authoritarian communism" now, wouldn't it?

load more comments
view more: next ›