this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
640 points (98.6% liked)

Privacy

47474 readers
1313 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MoffKalast@lemmy.world 25 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Scroll down and select your country: https://fightchatcontrol.eu/

It's always the ones you most expect.

[–] bampop@lemmy.world -1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

Green = "opposing", red = "supporting".... "chat control extension" whatever that means. So... by supporting it they rejected it? Could this be any more confusing? I have no idea who voted for what

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The "Chat Control" proposal would legalise scanning of all private digital communications, including encrypted messages and photos.

it's explained right there above the vote summary

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

It's not the topic of the vote I'm trying to clarify but rather trying to make sense of that web page showing who is voting for what, and how, if at all that is connected to the European Parliament vote. That website suggests overwhelming support for the proposal at both state and representative level, I'm not sure what to make of that.

[–] MoffKalast@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah it seems to be backwards, they voted for an "Extension of the temporary derogation", which I assume means if do you want to take more time to discuss this problem vote yes, or vote no to enact the newly proposed law now. Which is why the greens are paradoxically for the proposal and the EPP is against. Another layer of shenanigans to confuse people I guess.

https://howtheyvote.eu/votes/189574

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

It could be, although it also seems that "opposing" representatives are usually of the left/green persuasion and the right wing is mostly "supporting", which is not what I'd expect to see in that case. All I can say for sure is that it's very confusing.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

352 against

248 pro

44 undecided

A simple majority will do

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'm talking about a web page linked to by MoffKalast, see comments above

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Well the proposal is to extend the temporary exemption that expires on April 4.
As it is now under this exemption THEY ARE ALREADY doing their dystopian scanning.
Since there is no legal framework to do this they and it's against the current laws they use this exemption until they can force the final law that legalizes it.