this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
640 points (98.6% liked)

Privacy

47474 readers
1242 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 80 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why was chat control allowed to be presented again in the first place.

[–] chigga@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)

this is the real thing, this is almost certainly unconstitutional.

greedy corps going against law as usual.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 49 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

No, not really. It's because they retracted the proposal before going to vote, because they knew it wouldnt pass after Germany publicly said they would vote against.

Then they changed some stuff and send it again, which is now rejected as it seems.

Now they need to wait, but they didnt before.

[–] chigga@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

So this war is far from an end huh?

[–] Gumus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 8 hours ago

We have to win every time. They only need to win once.

[–] undeffeined@lemmy.ml 21 points 21 hours ago

They won't stop pushing until they get it

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

April 3, already planned

[–] leagman1@feddit.org 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] guy@piefed.social 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The Commission probably since they're the only entity who can propose law

[–] leagman1@feddit.org 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

How do I respond to this^^

Yes, I think we're all assuming the law came into parliament the regular way. I assumed the "they" are supposed lobbyists who are standing behind and outside the regular entity..

Am I missing something or are you pulling a Nielsen on me? "Coffee?" "Yes, I know."

[–] guy@piefed.social 2 points 22 hours ago

Oh, sorry. Thought you actually didn't knew, my bad!