this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
87 points (96.8% liked)

politics

29002 readers
1349 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The president issued a threat to deploy ICE agents in an apparent attempt to force Democrats to approve a new budget for the Department of Homeland Security.

Access options:

  • gift link works for about 90% of people; 10% get a registration-wall. You can work around that by using private browsing mode, reader mode, or an archived copy of the article:
  • archive.today — sometimes modifies archived pagest
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wavebeam@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

I’m white, if there is a middle class I’m in it, a man, and attractive (if I do say so myself, I wish this wasn’t relevant but it definitely is a part of the profiling) so my risk level is about as low as it could be in regards to being targeted by these fuckwits. But I do think if ICE is patrolling my fucking airport that I will tell work I’m not able to travel.

Sure, my one instance of business impact won’t do anything. But hopefully other folks like me will do the same thing. Enough to cause some amount of notice. And hey, if it doesn’t, at least I have a good fucking reason to not travel for work, I hate it.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 21 points 16 hours ago

People in airports may cut across all economic sectors, but it it is still mostly people with money.

So go ahead and flood the airports with ICE, and piss off the rich people and the business people. Let them get the ICE Ape experience first hand.

[–] normalentrance@lemmy.zip 21 points 16 hours ago

Exposing ice agents to more Americans seems like a great opportunity to make them even more hated. Good luck with that.

[–] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 4 points 13 hours ago

Oooh I can't wait to see how the Dems turn this into another win for trump!

[–] Inucune@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago

Airlines already struggling and suddenly a bunch of their pilots get arrested by ICE, delaying flights and upsetting entire chains of flights? On top of the ongoing ATC staffing debacle?

Go ahead, poke that bear.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 12 points 18 hours ago

I see this as only a win. The incompetence will make it backfire, meanwhile it takes ICE thugs off the streets.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 43 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

This could backfire magnificently.

Let the (typically upper-middle class) people in the airport witness and deal with ICE thuggery directly ... just before the budgetary debate. Let them see small children arrested, families being torn apart, threats and violence against innocent and non-threatening people just based on how they look. Let them see fascist thugs marching around saying 'papers, please' to everyone who isn't pasty white. Let all those moderately wealthy people with time on their hands make a stink to their congresspeople about what they saw.

It's going to expose a ton of people to ICE brutality who are normally insulated from this kind of shit. And that's going to shape opinions at a crucial political time.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago

God I can not wait for the conflict between the Tate-worshiping "alpha" and the 63 year old Karen when she starts screaming at him because she can't take her big bottle of shampoo through security.

[–] ytsedude@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

"We could do that, sure... Or, we could pretend to hold out just long enough to waste people's time, give in to Trump like we always do, and then bitch and complain all over the entire Internet and wonder why more and more people hate us."

--Leaders of the Democratic Party, probably

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

Double-digit percentage of them will love it, cheer them on, and yell for ICE to get a minority because the line will become shorter.

Man, I've got travel for work. I don't want to get pistol whipped to prove a point to the other travelers. XD

[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Me and my wife need to fly back to the US this April. We are terrified.

[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 2 points 15 hours ago

We have a serious trip back in October. Who knows what awaits us by then.

[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 19 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

We have friends in America. Was still considering whether or not to visit them there or somewhere else.

This confirms that visiting America is a bad idea.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 14 points 16 hours ago

This is NOT a time to visit America. There is a good chance you'll be turned away at the border, if not outright detained. Maybe meet your friends in a third country.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 29 points 23 hours ago

He should send them to Iran .

Pretty please.

[–] EndOfLine@lemmy.world 29 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Soooo, fewer ICE thugs on the street?

Since I got nowhere to go, I'll be laughing if they make the delays even worse because they're, you know, smooth brained incels who are so incompetent at everything that they feel the need to target children and the sick ... not to mention how they keep shooting themselves.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 10 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I am absolutely not defending the goons who apply for such jobs, lured in by the promise of bossing people around (to put it mildly) and, well, money.

But their training has been shortened to completely irresponsible levels. They actually do not know de-escalation, the legalities of their actions or how to handle a fire-arm. There's a whistleblower who at first didn't want to lawyer for ICE anymore and was then transfered to a training facility. His reports are brutal.

[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 7 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

They're not supposed to know de-escalation.

They're not supposed to know or care what's legal.

Their training is not irresponsible. Working as intended.

They're just evil.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 1 points 19 hours ago

I would guess at least the current bunch hasn't applied for de-escalation, even if they knew what it was. They are there to escalate and feel powerful.

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 8 points 23 hours ago

Unfortunately, the majority of Trump's most hardcore supporters rarely or never leave their state. It is the worst time to create further delays at airports. Hopefully the majority of those affected will blame Trump openly, widely and loudly.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 6 points 23 hours ago

Why is Trump threatening us with a good time?