this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
238 points (99.2% liked)

politics

29038 readers
1816 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I propose we call it the Luigi Movement, after Luigi Mario the less famous brother of Mario Mario.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lexam@lemmy.world 46 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Something with a sharp downward movement. On an unrelated note. I like French furniture.

Especially when it comes with a little basket attached for collecting cutoffs

[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 28 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I think a movement is putting it lightly.

It's probably worse than most people see on the surface and in pop culture.

I wonder how many people are killed to protect the game they play. Sure we have the wars... But I mean like quiet murders and accidental deaths. Or people trying to start a movement and then getting manipulated and put in jail or psych....or made to be homeless.

I think Americans are way to privileged and naive to understand the raw reality. We are groomed to NOT understand. We are submissive to a culture created by our masters and don't question it. We know it's real now... So i don't understand how people think they can change it by using the systems specifically made to create the problem.

The game players, regardless of nation, utilize the nations as tools. The nations are like a service. The nations people are the product, bought sold and traded for the benefit of the game playing elite. It's like cattle. We are the cattle and work horse, that nation is the farm owner, and the elite own the farmer.

It's not what we were told. It's not going to be fixed using the methods we were taught can fix it. I mean look where we are today... This is what following their lead got us to. The foundation is too rotted to rebuild on.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 days ago

No billionaires, no billionares' power.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago
[–] killea@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Billionaires need to be liquidated.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Sounds like a job for Brunt - FCA

[–] horn_e4_beaver@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think he'd just take a bribe tbh.

that's a given. you have to bribe Brunt just to get him to show up

[–] Curiousfur@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Fiat-Chrystler Automobiles?

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

We need a new social contract that makes accumulating more than a regular lifetime's amount of money unappealing.

We need solutions that are acceptable to all parties even if there are losers. The trick is getting the losers to accept it without coercion.

[–] Uranus_Hz@lemmy.zip 10 points 4 days ago

For decades the Epstein class has been grooming Americans to ridicule the French. Because the last thing they want is for Americans to get inspiration from any historical French solutions.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

There is no need to curb billionaire‘s power if you simply curb billionaires.

[–] DragonAce@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

The biggest hurdle to starting any sort of revolution or meaningful societal change in the US is finding leadership willing to risk having a target on their backs to rally the masses to action. Anyone willing to be the first to step up will be harassed, pursued, abused, and potentially killed.

[–] MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There are plenty of leaders to follow, plenty of groups to join, plenty of events to attend.

This type of information isn't broadcast on the local news. You have to go looking for like-minded people.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 days ago

The revolution will not be televised. It'll also not be on social media.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)
  • Use p2p social networks (you've already started!) and free and open source software
  • Get to know your neighbors
  • Talk to coworkers about pay, benefits, working conditions, and unions
  • Save as much money as you can outside of the American economy
  • Buy a gun, learn to maintain it, and spend time at the range
  • Participate in peaceful protests but be prepared to be attacked by police
[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

You missed "run for local office and replace those cronies in charge"

[–] MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Gee, if only we'd tried that before.

Remember the "1%" protests against the billionaire class?

It didn't matter, because every time people contribute to a 401k or go shopping at a chain box store, they add power to the 1%. People say they want to fight the ultra-rich, but they don't really want to fight. Nobody wants to sacrifice their comfort or security. We know from history how this ends...

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I guess we should do nothing then because a half-assed initiative failed

[–] MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, the initiative failed. They have guns and all the money. We have memes. Game over.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Guess you deserve what you get then

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The most practical forms of direct action benefit its participants individually. Classic example is joining a union, which will give you better compensation at their expense.

Unilateral sacrifices just exhaust you and accomplish little. Become a part of the new economy in which you want to live.

[–] ContriteErudite@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

You are right that worker unions should have the weight of collective bargaining behind them, enough to affect the big changes. However, the US has demonstrated again and again that it will just crush unions if they start to irritate the ownership class a little too much. Like what Reagan did to air traffic controllers, what Scott Walker did to the Wisconsin public employees union, and the 2022 railway worker labor dispute under Biden.

Unions have been defanged by decades of ownership class lobbying and regulatory capture. The executive branch has no qualms about neutralizing and marginalizing union workers who step too far out of line. Something much bigger than labor unions is needed, but I'm afraid the ownership class has us all so exhausted from overwork and the media too wary of our neighbors for that to happen. For the public to build the kind of movement it needs will take both a hugely impactful economic downturn that affects everyone, and as much as I wish it weren't the case, an immensely charismatic figure to pull them together. Whenever someone with an anti-status quo message and the charisma to start pulling people together starts to gain traction, they invariably end up on the business end of the CIA.

It's hard not to feel defeated and deflated, especially when we're all so exhausted.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The percentage of sociopaths involved with defining a society should never be greater than zero.

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

euthanised

More like a haircut.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago

~~through taxation~~

FTFY. ✊🏼

[–] FE80@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is Ralph Nader's 2000 campaign. Congratulations on catching up.

https://youtu.be/GNQb06kKysY

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

I was at the debate protest where they wouldn't allow him in, even with an actual ticket to the debate. And then SCOTUS signaled the bgenning of the end by appointing new world order Georgie boy.

[–] MisterCurtis@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

America needs to curb stomp billionaires.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Send them to fight in Iran. They can stay for as long as it takes for them to pay back their fair share in taxes. Assessed by federal minimum wage, of course.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 days ago

We need a WAR on greed.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 6 points 5 days ago

Luigi Mario is one of the richest video game characters in existence. His networth after inheriting that haunted mansion is enormous. The gems he finds alone are worth hundreds of millions.

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 6 points 5 days ago

Just THINKING of this is TERRORISM!

-Trump's NSPM-7 Memo!

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

No... really?

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Fun fact: guillotine is a ohko but only 30% accuracy

[–] huaxie@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

One of those moves that only hits if your opponent uses it.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago

Movement? Does bolt-action count?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I wish it hadn’t come to that … it ought to be more straightforward to roll back the clock, as MAGAts want to do. Roll back all those tax cuts for the wealthy. Roll back Supreme Court decisions letting them avoid taxes. Roll back letting corporate money dominate politics. Roll back union busting.

Income taxes used to be very progressive, in that wealthy people paid a much higher percentage. However now that ladder stops, the percentage stops rising, and ever more wealth and money accumulation can be defined as “not income”, so the wealthy pay the least in taxes (by percentage).

Rolling back these changes should help narrow the huge gap of income inequality, reduce corporate ownership of our government, and give ordinary people more of a voice

[–] btsax@reddthat.com 2 points 4 days ago

in that wealthy people paid a much higher percentage.

Wealthy people don't have income. Biggest pitfall

[–] HeroicBillyBishop@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

If by movement you mean bullets....you're almost there.

load more comments
view more: next ›