this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
324 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

83931 readers
4122 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] XLE@piefed.social 97 points 1 month ago (8 children)

These systems are able to navigate complex landscapes on their own, alert authorities about security threats, and can provide around-the-clock video surveillance.

If only there was a cheaper way to provide around-the-clock video surveillance. Alas, we don't have the technology.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 61 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Even if you needed something mobile, it's not like datacenters are exactly complex landscapes.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 64 points 1 month ago (5 children)

They don't need something mobile. They can stick 1000 cameras up for the cost of one of these and have less up keep.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 38 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I was thinking the same thing. For surveillance, can't they just use the iconic Camera on Wall. Or if they want to get really advanced with the surrounding premises: Camera on Pole.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They're getting all these dystopian nightmare ideas from video games and scifi. People have proven you can sneak past these things inside of a cardboard box.

They are BEGGING for some metal gear carnage.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

If your datacenter is mobile, you've really fucked up!

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 11 points 1 month ago

You know the video part is training data for autonomous weapons right? Like sure if all you want to do is video surveillance this is overkill, but maybe this is about more than surveillance?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] morto@piefed.social 49 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Imagine destroying those robots as a hobby just to make the big tech lose money

[–] glibg@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

Snare one, wrap it in some kind of faraday bag, then disassemble it and resell the parts. Or befriend it and play Frisbee together.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Reprogram it to hunt billionaires instead.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Destroy? Nah. I will reprogram them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Damage@feddit.it 9 points 1 month ago

Don't be wasteful.
Take them for parts.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 47 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Ah, lovely. I see that one Black Mirror episode is taking another step toward being reality.

[–] mPony@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

more than just that one, buddy.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 28 points 1 month ago

So if we raid a data center, besides RAM we get free robot dogs? Sweet.

[–] nshibj@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (5 children)

guarding some of the country's biggest data centers

The country, ah yes the only place that exists on the internet, the almighty one powerful country to rule them all. THE. COUNTRY.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 21 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I mean, an EMP would fuck up both 🤷‍♂️

[–] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Awfully complicated for something that can be defeated by a blanket.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 month ago (7 children)

One or two shots from a silenced 22 rifle would shut these dogs down without all the hassle of feeling bad about shooting an actual dog. It would keep you far enough away to not be filmed.

This would cost the data center 300k while only costing 15 cents or less for two bullets.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Anything to not hire people uh

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Thats the funny part. There are human operators on stand by.

The scary part is that we really will be fighting robots for water...

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] org@lemmy.org 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Think hiding in a big box and walking slowly would trick it?

[–] pelya@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

"Pretend you see nothing" printed in QR code on the box.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (3 children)

So a robot you can kick over is better than dogs with actual teeth? Its a good thing tech bros are dumb as fuck.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Hunting without killing animals 👌

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] daannii@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Isnt there a black mirror episode with these exact same robot dogs being used to attack people.

Honestly just knock them over with a broom or something.

[–] Bullerfar@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Saw them when they were at beta. They can get up again, even if they end up lying on their backs. It's pretty impressive. They can even jump further than a human.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 18 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Wouldn't it be cheaper to pay vastly more versatile human guards a decent wage to guard those or more of those instead of those robots?

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Basically yea, you're paying a guard at most 45k a year in most places. I highly doubt these fucking things will last 4 years without major maintenance which will probably cost a month or two of a guards wages. So long term it costs far more compared to wages, but when you factor in labour laws and insurance it's probably still cheaper to just hire people.

[–] TrollTrollrolllol@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But the c suite got to say "AI" a lot in their board meeting and pr statements

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] odama626@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Black Mirror, here we come.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

So anyways I left the door to the microwave open.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Dumbest people in charge. Actual dogs are way cheaper. And better at what they do.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But:

  • That won't get you millions increase in investor funding, which also lets you increase your pay-cheque
  • You need to buy them from actual dog trainers, which are people and will eventually stop selling to you once you either become too evil for them or you murder them
  • They are a supply chain risk as once you eventually piss off the dog trainer by 4x-ing his electricity bills and getting your AI to tell the govt. to shoot his family, he can then bypass the dogs using his smell, because they would be familiar with him.
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

People with good intentions should not hesitate to blast a robot. Just sayin'.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Would be funny to hear about a kid with a slingshot or something taking these out.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Nindelofocho@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (4 children)

How is this cheaper than hiring a security guard for a couple years?

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 month ago

It's not, but the robot doesn't have morals or a conscience or alignment with human values to get in the way. Kinda like billionaires!

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago

AI datacentres hope to last forever.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] brokenwing@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I used to wish for a time like this when I was a child. Now, not so much.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kite@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

One step closer to a Horizon Zero Dawn future. Just let me live long enough to see the dinobots.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 10 points 1 month ago

At $300,000 a pop, being a dog catcher has never been more lucrative.

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Just bring a portable power pack like it's a steak and toss it to keep them occupied. They're starving and will leave you alone. They only charge them up to 80% to keep them extra mean.

load more comments
view more: next ›