this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
324 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

82992 readers
2943 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] XLE@piefed.social 97 points 5 days ago (6 children)

These systems are able to navigate complex landscapes on their own, alert authorities about security threats, and can provide around-the-clock video surveillance.

If only there was a cheaper way to provide around-the-clock video surveillance. Alas, we don't have the technology.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 61 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Even if you needed something mobile, it's not like datacenters are exactly complex landscapes.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 64 points 5 days ago (3 children)

They don't need something mobile. They can stick 1000 cameras up for the cost of one of these and have less up keep.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 38 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I was thinking the same thing. For surveillance, can't they just use the iconic Camera on Wall. Or if they want to get really advanced with the surrounding premises: Camera on Pole.

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Camera on pole can't "remove" problems as quickly

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't think these can either, they don't list attack or defensive capabilities on the feature list that I saw, I assume this is just an over glorified video camera that can follow the intruder around.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Maybe not factory. But if Michael Reeves can teach one how to piss beer, I'm sure there's options on the market.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 days ago

You don't need a robot dog to have a gun. If you really wanted to have a wall mounted camera with a gun on it, it would be just as easy.

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

And use AI to actually monitor the thousand cameras. Ask me how I know.

[–] asbestos@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

The AI company I work for recently rolled it out. It works. We are getting alerts when we block the view of a monitored object or an unfamiliar face is in a secure location. Many thousands of cameras are monitored with minimal human oversight.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 days ago

With enough kinetic energy, anything's mobile.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They're getting all these dystopian nightmare ideas from video games and scifi. People have proven you can sneak past these things inside of a cardboard box.

They are BEGGING for some metal gear carnage.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I wonder how many robot duds will be stolen per year? Lots of neat parts in them if you know some electronics.

[–] Chivera@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

The elites don't want you to know this but the robot dogs patrolling data centers are free. You can take them home.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

Someone will be posting about a factory reset button within a year.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

If your datacenter is mobile, you've really fucked up!

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 11 points 5 days ago

You know the video part is training data for autonomous weapons right? Like sure if all you want to do is video surveillance this is overkill, but maybe this is about more than surveillance?

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Data centers and wasting massive amounts of resources. Name a more iconic duo.

[–] mPony@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

billionaires and every crime in the book.

[–] borkborkbork@piefed.social 6 points 5 days ago

oh they'll figure it out real quick when these bots get pwned and become malware vectors against the data centers they're 'protecting'

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I still don't understand them not just making a tribe of loved equals for a bunker. Power rots the mind and soul

It's almost like they need something mobile they can add weaponry to that could chase and hunt down security threats...